Literature DB >> 25541567

COVARIANCE ASSISTED SCREENING AND ESTIMATION.

By Tracy Ke1, Jiashun Jin1, Jianqing Fan1.   

Abstract

Consider a linear model Y = X β + z, where X = Xn,p and z ~ N(0, In ). The vector β is unknown and it is of interest to separate its nonzero coordinates from the zero ones (i.e., variable selection). Motivated by examples in long-memory time series (Fan and Yao, 2003) and the change-point problem (Bhattacharya, 1994), we are primarily interested in the case where the Gram matrix G = X'X is non-sparse but sparsifiable by a finite order linear filter. We focus on the regime where signals are both rare and weak so that successful variable selection is very challenging but is still possible. We approach this problem by a new procedure called the Covariance Assisted Screening and Estimation (CASE). CASE first uses a linear filtering to reduce the original setting to a new regression model where the corresponding Gram (covariance) matrix is sparse. The new covariance matrix induces a sparse graph, which guides us to conduct multivariate screening without visiting all the submodels. By interacting with the signal sparsity, the graph enables us to decompose the original problem into many separated small-size subproblems (if only we know where they are!). Linear filtering also induces a so-called problem of information leakage, which can be overcome by the newly introduced patching technique. Together, these give rise to CASE, which is a two-stage Screen and Clean (Fan and Song, 2010; Wasserman and Roeder, 2009) procedure, where we first identify candidates of these submodels by patching and screening, and then re-examine each candidate to remove false positives. For any procedure β̂ for variable selection, we measure the performance by the minimax Hamming distance between the sign vectors of β̂ and β. We show that in a broad class of situations where the Gram matrix is non-sparse but sparsifiable, CASE achieves the optimal rate of convergence. The results are successfully applied to long-memory time series and the change-point model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymptotic minimaxity; Graph of Least Favorables (GOLF); Graph of Strong Dependence (GOSD); Hamming distance; Rare and Weak signal model; multivariate screening; phase diagram; sparsity; variable selection

Year:  2014        PMID: 25541567      PMCID: PMC4274608          DOI: 10.1214/14-AOS1243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stat        ISSN: 0090-5364            Impact factor:   4.028


  10 in total

1.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Variance estimation using refitted cross-validation in ultrahigh dimensional regression.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Shaojun Guo; Ning Hao
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using the fused lasso.

Authors:  Robert Tibshirani; Pei Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Higher criticism thresholding: Optimal feature selection when useful features are rare and weak.

Authors:  David Donoho; Jiashun Jin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Detecting simultaneous changepoints in multiple sequences.

Authors:  Nancy R Zhang; David O Siegmund; Hanlee Ji; Jun Z Li
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  STRONG ORACLE OPTIMALITY OF FOLDED CONCAVE PENALIZED ESTIMATION.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Lingzhou Xue; Hui Zou
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  HIGH DIMENSIONAL VARIABLE SELECTION.

Authors:  Larry Wasserman; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.028

9.  THE SCREENING AND RANKING ALGORITHM TO DETECT DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS.

Authors:  Yue S Niu; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Multiclass linear discriminant analysis with ultrahigh-dimensional features.

Authors:  Yanming Li; Hyokyoung G Hong; Yi Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Covariate Information Number for Feature Screening in Ultrahigh-Dimensional Supervised Problems.

Authors:  Debmalya Nandy; Francesca Chiaromonte; Runze Li
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.369

3.  Partition-based ultrahigh-dimensional variable screening.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Hyokyoung G Hong; Y I Li
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.445

4.  Bayesian block-diagonal variable selection and model averaging.

Authors:  O Papaspiliopoulos; D Rossell
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.445

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.