Literature DB >> 25540761

Surgical results of the slipped medial rectus muscle after hang back recession surgery.

Yasar Duranoglu1, Hatice Deniz Ilhan1, Meryem Guler Alis2.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the surgical results of a slipped medial rectus muscle (MRM) after hang back recession surgery for esotropia.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients who underwent re-exploration for diagnosed slipped muscle after hang back recession surgery were included in this retrospective study. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging was performed to identify the location of the slipped muscle. Ocular motility was evaluated with assessment with prism and cover test in gaze at cardinal positions. The operations were performed by the same consultant. Intraoperative forced duction test was performed under general anesthesia. The empty sheath of the slipped MRM was resected and the muscle was advanced to the original insertion site in all patients.
RESULTS: The average age of 21 patients who had consecutive exotropia with a slipped MRM at the time of presentation was 17.4±5.4y (5-50y). The average duration between the first operation and the diagnosis of the slipped muscle was 25mo (12 to 36mo). The mean follow up after the corrective surgery was 28mo. The mean preoperative adduction limitation in the field of action of the slipped muscle was -2.26 (ranging from -1 to -4). All patients had full adduction postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of the slipped muscle should be confirmed during the strabismus surgery. The slipped muscle may be caused due to insufficient suture and excessive rubbing of the eye. When divergent strabismus is observed after the recession of the MRM, a slipped muscle should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  empty sheath; esotropia; hang back recession; re-exploration; slipped muscle

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540761      PMCID: PMC4270972          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

Review 1.  Slipped and lost extraocular muscles.

Authors:  T D Lenart; S R Lambert
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Slipped, severed, torn and lost extraocular muscles.

Authors:  Carole G Cherfan; Elias I Traboulsi
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 3.  Complications of strabismus surgery.

Authors:  John W Simon
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  Traumatic avulsion of extraocular muscles: case reports.

Authors:  Nilza Minguini; Karin Suzete Ikeda; Keila Monteiro de Carvalho
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.872

5.  The role of slipped and lost muscles in overcorrections in strabismus.

Authors:  H S Metz
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1976

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the medial rectus muscle of patients with consecutive exotropia after medial rectus muscle recession.

Authors:  Takashi Negishi; Akiko Hikoya; Haruo Isoda; Yoko Tsuchiya; Mayu Sawada; Yoshihiro Hotta; Miho Sato
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The oculocardiac reflex as a surgical aid in identifying a slipped or 'lost' extraocular muscle.

Authors:  L Apt; S J Isenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Adjustment of the surgical nomogram for surgery on slipped extraocular muscles.

Authors:  Rani T Sebastian; Ian B Marsh
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Diagnosis and management of the surgical complication of postoperative "slipped" medial rectus muscle: a new "tendon step test" and outcome/results in 11 cases.

Authors:  Judith Raz; Joelle Bernheim; Eran Pras; Chamutal Saar; Ehud I Assia
Journal:  Binocul Vis Strabismus Q       Date:  2002

10.  The etiology, treatment and prevention of the "slipped muscle".

Authors:  J N Bloom; M M Parks
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Comparison of hang-back recession and conventional recession for correction of exotropia].

Authors:  S Schönfeld; S Heede; D J Salchow
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.