PURPOSE: To investigate the morphologic characteristics of the medial rectus muscle in patients with consecutive exotropia. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Eleven eyes of 10 patients with consecutive exotropia were studied. Thirteen eyes of 13 age-matched normal subjects were studied as controls. METHODS: All of the patients underwent an advancement of a previously operated medial rectus muscle. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the insertion of the medial rectus muscle: Normally recessed stretched scar, and slipped muscle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comparison was made of the clinical findings, intraoperative findings, and distance from the limbus to the medial rectus muscle measured on magnetic resonance images among the groups. RESULTS: The medial rectus of 4 eyes of 3 patients had normally recessed insertions and 7 eyes had abnormal insertions (3 stretched scars, 4 slipped muscles). The clinical findings were not different among the 3 groups. The magnetic resonance images showed that the medial rectus muscle was located closest to the limbus in the control subjects and most distant in the patients with a slipped muscle (P<0.005). The clinical findings in the patients with a stretched scar and with normally recessed were indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance images of the medial rectus muscles of the control subjects and operated groups are significantly different morphologically. A slipped medial rectus muscle has characteristic magnetic resonance findings that are distinguishable from the muscle with normally recessed and stretched scar.
PURPOSE: To investigate the morphologic characteristics of the medial rectus muscle in patients with consecutive exotropia. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Eleven eyes of 10 patients with consecutive exotropia were studied. Thirteen eyes of 13 age-matched normal subjects were studied as controls. METHODS: All of the patients underwent an advancement of a previously operated medial rectus muscle. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the insertion of the medial rectus muscle: Normally recessed stretched scar, and slipped muscle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comparison was made of the clinical findings, intraoperative findings, and distance from the limbus to the medial rectus muscle measured on magnetic resonance images among the groups. RESULTS: The medial rectus of 4 eyes of 3 patients had normally recessed insertions and 7 eyes had abnormal insertions (3 stretched scars, 4 slipped muscles). The clinical findings were not different among the 3 groups. The magnetic resonance images showed that the medial rectus muscle was located closest to the limbus in the control subjects and most distant in the patients with a slipped muscle (P<0.005). The clinical findings in the patients with a stretched scar and with normally recessed were indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance images of the medial rectus muscles of the control subjects and operated groups are significantly different morphologically. A slipped medial rectus muscle has characteristic magnetic resonance findings that are distinguishable from the muscle with normally recessed and stretched scar.