Literature DB >> 25540733

Female gender in the setting of liver transplantation.

Kryssia Isabel Rodríguez-Castro1, Eleonora De Martin1, Martina Gambato1, Silvia Lazzaro1, Erica Villa1, Patrizia Burra1.   

Abstract

The evolution of liver diseases to end-stage liver disease or to acute hepatic failure, the evaluation process for liver transplantation, the organ allocation decision-making, as well as the post-transplant outcomes are different between female and male genders. Women's access to liver transplantation is hampered by the use of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, in which creatinine values exert a systematic bias against women due to their lower values even in the presence of variable degrees of renal dysfunction. Furthermore, even when correcting MELD score for gender-appropriate creatinine determination, a quantifiable uneven access to transplant prevails, demonstrating that other factors are also involved. While some of the differences can be explained from the epidemiological point of view, hormonal status plays an important role. Moreover, the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal stages imply profound differences in a woman's physiology, including not only the passage from the fertile age to the non-fertile stage, but also the loss of estrogens and their potentially protective role in delaying liver fibrosis progression, amongst others. With menopause, the tendency to gain weight may contribute to the development of or worsening of pre-existing metabolic syndrome. As an increasing number of patients are transplanted for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and as the average age at transplant increases, clinicians must be prepared for the management of this particular condition, especially in post-menopausal women, who are at particular risk of developing metabolic complications after menopause.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Creatinine; Estrogens; Female gender; Gender donor-recipient match; Liver transplantation; Model for end-stage liver disease score

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540733      PMCID: PMC4274594          DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Transplant        ISSN: 2220-3230


  158 in total

Review 1.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Early menopause is associated with lack of response to antiviral therapy in women with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Erica Villa; Aimilia Karampatou; Calogero Cammà; Alfredo Di Leo; Monica Luongo; Anna Ferrari; Salvatore Petta; Luisa Losi; Gloria Taliani; Paolo Trande; Barbara Lei; Amalia Graziosi; Veronica Bernabucci; Rosina Critelli; Paola Pazienza; Maria Rendina; Alessandro Antonelli; Antonio Francavilla
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Sexual dysfunction in chronic liver disease: is liver transplantation an effective cure?

Authors:  Patrizia Burra; Giacomo Germani; Annalisa Masier; Eleonora De Martin; Martina Gambato; Andrea Salonia; Patrizio Bo; Alessandro Vitale; Umberto Cillo; Francesco Paolo Russo; Marco Senzolo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Pregnancy outcomes among female recipients after liver transplantation: further experience.

Authors:  Z Jabiry-Zieniewicz; M Szpotanska-Sikorska; B Pietrzak; B Kociszewska-Najman; B Foroncewicz; K Mucha; K Zieniewicz; M Krawczyk; M Wielgos
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 5.  Fibrosis progression and the pros and cons of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a review.

Authors:  E De Martin; M Senzolo; M Gambato; G Germani; A Vitale; F R Russo; P Burra
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Hepatitis E virus infection in pregnancy in Ethiopia.

Authors:  E Tsega; K Krawczynski; B G Hansson; E Nordenfelt
Journal:  Ethiop Med J       Date:  1993-07

7.  Post-transplant outcomes of patients with and without hepatitis C virus infection according to donor age and gender matching.

Authors:  Michał Grąt; Oskar Kornasiewicz; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Joanna Ligocka; Karolina Grąt; Karolina Maria Wronka; Krzysztof Zieniewicz; Marek Krawczyk
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 1.530

8.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Vijayan Balan; Jose L Hernandez; Ann M Harper; Erick B Edwards; Hector Rodriguez-Luna; Thomas Byrne; Hugo E Vargas; David Mulligan; Jorge Rakela; Russell H Wiesner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Factors influencing long-term quality of life and depression in German liver transplant recipients: a single-centre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alexandra Zahn; Lisa Seubert; Jana Jünger; Dieter Schellberg; Karl Heinz Weiss; Peter Schemmer; Wolfgang Stremmel; Peter Sauer; Daniel Nils Gotthardt
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 1.530

10.  New Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Database.

Authors:  Anitha D Yadav; Yu-Hui Chang; Bashar A Aqel; Thomas J Byrne; Harini A Chakkera; David D Douglas; David C Mulligan; Jorge Rakela; Hugo E Vargas; Elizabeth J Carey
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2013-09-24
View more
  7 in total

1.  Comprehensive risk assessment for early neurologic complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Si-Yuan Wu; Teng-Wei Chen; An-Chieh Feng; Hsiu-Lung Fan; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Kuo-Piao Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Race and Gender Disparity in the Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Cancer: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Registry.

Authors:  Michael Darden; Geoffrey Parker; Dominique Monlezun; Edward Anderson; Joseph F Buell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Disparities in Waitlist and Posttransplantation Outcomes in Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients Aged 18 to 24 Years: Analysis of the UNOS Database.

Authors:  Noelle H Ebel; Evelyn K Hsu; Kristin Berry; Simon P Horslen; George N Ioannou
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Women receive more inpatient resections and ablations for hepatocellular carcinoma than men.

Authors:  Lindsay Sobotka; Alice Hinton; Lanla Conteh
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM): A Novel Visual Instrument to Quantify Suffering in Liver Cirrhosis Patients and Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Iyad Kabar; Anna Hüsing-Kabar; Miriam Maschmeier; Carolin Völler; Marina Dümke; Hartmut H Schmidt; Hauke Heinzow
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.530

6.  Sex disparities in waitlisting and liver transplant for acute liver failure.

Authors:  Lauren D Nephew; Zahra Zia; Marwan Ghabril; Eric Orman; Craig Lammert; Chandrashekhar Kubal; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-11-01

7.  Correcting the sex disparity in MELD-Na.

Authors:  Nicholas L Wood; Douglas VanDerwerken; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.369

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.