Literature DB >> 24361968

Post-transplant outcomes of patients with and without hepatitis C virus infection according to donor age and gender matching.

Michał Grąt1, Oskar Kornasiewicz1, Zbigniew Lewandowski2, Joanna Ligocka1, Karolina Grąt1, Karolina Maria Wronka1, Krzysztof Zieniewicz1, Marek Krawczyk1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of donor age and donor-recipient gender matching on liver transplantation outcomes, focusing on differences between patients with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 622 liver transplantation recipients. HCV (n=164) and non-HCV (n=458) patients were subdivided by donor age (≤ 30, 31-50, and >50 years) and donor-recipient gender configurations. Five-year patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were set as outcome measures.
RESULTS: Five-year PS was 83.1% for HCV-positive and 81.6% for HCV-negative patients (p=0.614), with the corresponding GS rates of 81.2% and 79.3% (p=0.538), respectively. In HCV patients, transplantations from donors older than 50 years were associated with lower PS (p=0.035) and GS (p=0.006) than those from donors aged 31-50 years. This difference was not observed among non-HCV recipients (PS, p=0.994; GS, p=0.878). Regarding donor-recipient gender configurations, outcomes were similar in HCV (PS, p=0.751; GS, p=0.592) and non-HCV patients (PS, p=0.217; GS, p=0.249), except for a tendency toward lower PS for male-to-female transplantations than female-to-female transplantations in non-HCV patients (p=0.064). Outcomes of HCV patients were superior to those of non-HCV patients after transplantation from donors aged 31-50 years (PS, p=0.080; GS, p=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding the transplantation of grafts from donors aged over 50 years to patients with HCV infection might improve the general outcomes of liver transplantation programs. There is no specific rationale for gender matching with respect to HCV status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24361968     DOI: 10.12659/AOT.889537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  6 in total

1.  Long-term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Recipients.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Christine Durand; Rhiannon D Reed; Paul A MacLennan; Shikha Mehta; Allan Massie; Anoma Nellore; Derek DuBay; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Outcomes among older adult liver transplantation recipients in the model of end stage liver disease (MELD) era.

Authors:  Maricar F Malinis; Shu Chen; Heather G Allore; Vincent J Quagliarello
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 3.  Female gender in the setting of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kryssia Isabel Rodríguez-Castro; Eleonora De Martin; Martina Gambato; Silvia Lazzaro; Erica Villa; Patrizia Burra
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 4.  Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.

Authors:  Michael L Schilsky; Maryam Moini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Influence of donor-recipient sex mismatch on long-term survival of pancreatic grafts.

Authors:  Zhiwei Li; Shengmin Mei; Jie Xiang; Jie Zhou; Qijun Zhang; Sheng Yan; Lin Zhou; Zhenhua Hu; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Resting and Exercise Energy Metabolism After Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Ajay Singhvi; H Steven Sadowsky; Ayelet Cohen; Alysen Demzik; Lisa VanWagner; Mary Rinella; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.