Su-Kyoung Lee1, Sang-Yeol Lee2, Jae-Min Jung1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae College, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Science, Kyungsung University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The present study aimed to determine the changes in the muscle activities of the gluteus medius, latissimus dorsi, and gluteus maximus at different gait speeds, to collect basic data for the study of the gluteus medius. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 18 young and healthy male adults whose mean age, height, and weight were 26.4 years, 173.37 cm, and 72.5 kg, respectively. Electromyograpy was used to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of each muscle three times and the values averaged. Then, the subjects walked on a treadmill at gait speeds of 1.5 m/s, 2.5 m/s, and 3.5 m/s and the muscle activity of each muscle was measured. [Results] The gluteus medius showed no significant difference in muscle activity among the different gait speeds. [Conclusion] For selectively strengthening the gluteus medius, to establish the external stability of the pelvis during walking, weight loading or sloped treadmills are effective interventions. However, different gait speeds exert no significant effect on the selective strengthening of the gluteus medius.
[Purpose] The present study aimed to determine the changes in the muscle activities of the gluteus medius, latissimus dorsi, and gluteus maximus at different gait speeds, to collect basic data for the study of the gluteus medius. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects were 18 young and healthy male adults whose mean age, height, and weight were 26.4 years, 173.37 cm, and 72.5 kg, respectively. Electromyograpy was used to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of each muscle three times and the values averaged. Then, the subjects walked on a treadmill at gait speeds of 1.5 m/s, 2.5 m/s, and 3.5 m/s and the muscle activity of each muscle was measured. [Results] The gluteus medius showed no significant difference in muscle activity among the different gait speeds. [Conclusion] For selectively strengthening the gluteus medius, to establish the external stability of the pelvis during walking, weight loading or sloped treadmills are effective interventions. However, different gait speeds exert no significant effect on the selective strengthening of the gluteus medius.
The symmetry of gait refers to the shift and support of body weight on both sides of the
lower extremities, and it requires external stability of the hip joint. External stability
is the ability to control the center of mass of body weight while moving the body1). During the stance phase of gait, the
posture of the hip joints is stabilized and the gluteus medius, which is the hip abductor
muscle in the hip joint, plays an important role in independent gait and balance
recovery2). Muscle weakness and
malfunction of the gluteus medius is related to various musculoskeletal disorders, including
low back pain3, 4), while height differences in the hip joint can be found in persons
with radiating pain around the low back and hip joints, which is accompanied by muscle
weakness in the gluteus medius5). Vleeming
et al.6) suggested that a posterior oblique
sling links the hamstring, gluteus maximus, thoracolumbar fascia, and contralateral
latissimus dorsi, in sequence. Lee et al.7)
studied the changes in muscle activity of the gluteus medius in the stance phase as vertical
load was applied to the lower extremities in the swing phase. They found that muscle
activity increased when 0.5 kg of vertical load was applied to the lower extremities in the
swing phase compared to normal gait, whereas counterintuitively the muscle activity
decreased when 1 kg of vertical load was applied, comparied to the 0.5 kg load. In addition,
they noted that among loads of 0, 1 and 2% of body weight, the most appropriate weight for
strengthening the gluteus medius was a vertical load of 1% of body weight8). Furthermore, Jung et al.9) measured the muscle activity in the gluteus
medius during walking on a treadmill set at angles of 0°, 5°, and 10°, and they showed that
the muscle activity was the highest at when the treadmill angle was 5°. These previous
studies discussed muscle activity of the gluteus medius in relation to vertical loads and
treadmill angles, which are intervention conditions whose outcomes are thought to be
affected by gait speed. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the changes in the
muscle activities of the gluteus medius, latissimus dorsi, and gluteus maximus at different
gait speeds, to collect basic data for the study of the gluteus medius.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
The subjects of this study were 18 young and healthy male adults whose mean age, height,
and weight were 26.4 years, 173.37 cm, and 72.5 kg, respectively. The subjects had no
history of functional impairment in their musculoskeletal or nervous systems and they had no
difficulty with normal gait. This study complied with the ethical principles of the
Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects fully understood the experimental method before the
experiment started and they participated in the experiment voluntarily. In addition, none of
the processes in this study were harmful to the human body and all the subjects read and
signed a written consent form. Electromyography (EMG) was used to measure the maximum
voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). The MVIC activities of the gluteus medius,
latissimus dorsi, and gluteus maximus were measured three times and then averaged. Then, the
subjects walked on a treadmill at gait speeds of 1.5 m/s, 2.5 m/s, and 3.5 m/s while the
muscle activities of each muscle were measured. A MP36 (BIOPAC System Inc., USA) was
employed to collect EMG data of the latissimus dorsi, the gluteus medius, and the gluteus
maximus. While subjects walked at the three different gait speeds, the EMG signals were
collected for 20 seconds out of 30 seconds, the first and last five seconds being discarded.
For each EMG measurement, the subjects performed gait on the treadmill for one minute under
the same conditions and measurements were taken during the last 30 seconds of gait. The
subjects walked barefoot and they removed all the outer clothing they were wearing on the
upper portion of their body, retaining only their undershirts. The electrodes were placed
horizontally in the direction of the muscle fibers at 4 cm below the inferior angle of the
scapula in the middle area between the outermost end of the trunk and the vertebrae for the
latissimus dorsi. The electrodes were placed horizontally in the direction of the muscle
fibers at one third the distance between the greater trochanter of the femur and the second
sacrum for the gluteus maximus, and for the gluteus medius the electrodes were placed
horizontally in the direction of the muscle fibers at one third the distance between the
iliac crest and the greater trochanter. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the
pelvic muscle activities during gait. As a post hoc test, the least significant difference
test was used. For the data analysis, SPSS software version 18.0 was used. The significance
level was chosen as 0.05.
RESULTS
A comparison of the results of the pelvic muscle activities at the under various gait
speeds found that the latissimus dorsi showed a significant increase in muscle activity when
performing a faster than normal gait, while the gluteus medius showed no significant
difference in muscle activities among the different gait speeds. The gluteus maximus showed
increases in muscle activity when performing gait at speeds faster than the normal gait
speed (1.5 m/s) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparison of the muscle activities at the different gait speeds (unit:
%MVIC)
1.5 m/s
2.5 m/s
3.5 m/s
GMed
11.57±3.50
10.88±3.56
9.86±3.14
LD*
2.74±1.16
3.18±1.34
4.25±1.77†‡
GMax*
10.38±2.54
11.47±2.42
12.53±2.42¥
*p<0.05, Mean±SD. GMed: gluteus medius, LD: latissimus dorsi, GMax: gluteus
maximus. †significant difference between 1.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
‡significant difference between 2.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
¥significant difference between 1.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
*p<0.05, Mean±SD. GMed: gluteus medius, LD: latissimus dorsi, GMax: gluteus
maximus. †significant difference between 1.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
‡significant difference between 2.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
¥significant difference between 1.5 m/s and 3.5 m/s (p<0.05).
DISCUSSION
A social and functional gait, such as crossing the road safely, requires a speed of 1.1–1.5
m/s on average10). This study aimed to
determine changes in muscle activity of the gluteus medius at gait speeds faster than a
normal gait speed. Although a number of studies have been conducted to determine changes in
the muscle activity of the gluteus medius across different intervention methods used to
strengthen the gluteus medius, few studies have been conducted on the changes in muscle
activity of the gluteus medius with gait speed. The gluteus medius is a muscle that prevents
the pelvis from descending on the opposite side to the leg in the swing phase during
walking. In previous studies, this muscle was selectively strengthened by applying weight to
the legs or changing the angle of treadmills. However, those studies did not investigate
changes in gait speed. Our present study’s results show that gait speed has no effect on the
selective strengthening of the gluteus medius. The study conducted by Sin et al.11) also noted that no change in the muscle
activity of the gluteus medius was found between gait speeds changes of 3.5 and 5.5 m/s. In
particular, while performing gait with weight loading on the arm, changes in the muscle
activities of the latissimus dorsi and the gluteus maximus, which are the principal muscles
of the Posterior Oblique Sling Theory proposed by Bermark12), were found to be significant, but no change in the muscle activity
of the gluteus medius was found. In summary, at faster gait speeds, greater increases in the
muscle activities of the latissimus dorsi and the gluteus maximus are seen, whereas no
correlation has been found between gait speed and the muscle activity of the gluteus medius.
In this study, we measured the muscle activity of the gluteus medius, at a normal gait
speed, and at gait speeds faster than that normally used in ordinary daily living.
Therefore, intervention methods that aim to selectively strengthen the gluteus medius in
order to establish external provide stability of the pelvis during walking, using weight
loading or sloped treadmills are an effective intervention methods, but changing the gait
speed has no significant effect on the selective strengthening of the gluteus medius.
Authors: A Vleeming; A L Pool-Goudzwaard; R Stoeckart; J P van Wingerden; C J Snijders Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1995-04-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Carlos De la Fuente; Alejandro Neira; Gustavo Torres; Rony Silvestre; Matias Roby; Roberto Yañez; Sofia Herrera; Virgina Martabit; Isabel McKay; Felipe P Carpes Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Magdalena Ogłuszka; Agnieszka Szostak; Marinus F W Te Pas; Ewa Poławska; Paweł Urbański; Tadeusz Blicharski; Chandra S Pareek; Edyta Juszczuk-Kubiak; Jenelle R Dunkelberger; Jarosław O Horbańczuk; Mariusz Pierzchała Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 5.523