Da-Eun Jeong1, Su-Kyoung Lee2, Kyoung Kim3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Daegu University, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae College, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activity of the gluteus medius according to treadmill inclination during gait with a vertical load on a treadmill. [Methods] Sixteen healthy subjects were recruited for this study. The subjects walked on a treadmill at inclination angles of 0, 5, and 10 degrees. [Results] Muscle activity of the gluteus medius increased at 5° compared to 0° treadmill inclination, though the difference was not significant. On the other hand, gluteus medius muscle activity significantly decreased in treadmill walking at an inclination of 10° compared to 5°. [Conclusion] Selective strengthening exercises using a 5° treadmill angle could be useful for patients experiencing gluteus medius weakness.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle activity of the gluteus medius according to treadmill inclination during gait with a vertical load on a treadmill. [Methods] Sixteen healthy subjects were recruited for this study. The subjects walked on a treadmill at inclination angles of 0, 5, and 10 degrees. [Results] Muscle activity of the gluteus medius increased at 5° compared to 0° treadmill inclination, though the difference was not significant. On the other hand, gluteus medius muscle activity significantly decreased in treadmill walking at an inclination of 10° compared to 5°. [Conclusion] Selective strengthening exercises using a 5° treadmill angle could be useful for patients experiencing gluteus medius weakness.
For smooth rhythmical alternating shifts, the muscle strength of the lower extremities is
essential, and the improvement of the strength of these muscles is very effective at
improving balance, speed, and distance during walking1). In particular, among the muscles of the lower extremities, the hip
abductor plays an important role in maintaining the balance of the lower extremities in
standing positions, in taking a step forward, and in adjusting strides. During single-leg
stance in the gait cycle, since the entire weight of the lower extremity is supported by
only one foot, the activities of the gluteus medius and the gluteus minimus, which are
active in the single-leg stance phase, are very important2). Patients with weakened gluteus medius cannot support their weight
during the mid-stance phase, and, they tilt the pelvis toward the other side of their body.
As a result, the pelvis on the other side of the body lowers, showing a Trendelenburg sign.
Additionally, Fredericson et al.3) reported
that hip joint adduction and internal rotation might increase due to weakness of the gluteus
medius, resulting in iliotibial band syndrome. Therefore, selective exercises for the
gluteus medius, which plays a primary role in hip joint stability, are necessary for
rehabilitation of the musculoskeletal system of the waist and lower extremities. Moreover,
controlling the unnecessary movements that occur during the exercises is recognized as being
important during exercise therapy. For instance, the use of a pelvic compression belt during
hip abduction in a side-lying position is a good method for preventing compensatory actions,
including the reduction of the activation of the quadratus lumborum while activating the
gluteus medius4). Lee5) also reported that walking on flat land with a vertical load
equal to 1% of the body weight was effective for selective activation of the gluteus medius.
Although various methods for selective reinforcement of the muscle strength of the gluteus
medius have been studied recently, no study has been conducted regarding the angles of
walking surface inclination. Walking on inclined planes not only occurs commonly in daily
living, but it can also be a means of vertical migration that can replace stairs6). Additionally, it requires more balance
ability and postural control ability compared to walking on flat land7). Therefore, diverse angles of inclination were used in this
study, and the effect of inclination on the degree of activation of the gluteus medius
during walking with a load of 1% of body weight was studied.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study was conducted with 16 healthy young female subjects who had no functional
disorders of their musculoskeletal system or nervous system, and could walk normally. The
subjects voluntarily participated in the experiment after being given an explanation of the
experimental method. All processes used in this study were harmless to the human body, and
all subjects read and signed a written consent form. The subjects’ mean age was 20.4 years,
their mean height was 163.37 cm, and their mean weight was 55.8 kg.The experiment began after having the subjects had walked freely on treadmill for five
minutes so that their usual gait patterns could be observed. The speed was set to 2 km/h,
which is a normal person’s average walking speed. To determine the activity of the left
gluteus medius, the degree of contraction of the gluteus medius during single support by the
left foot was measured using electromyography. To eliminate order effects, the angles of
inclination of the treadmill were randomly provided, and sufficient rests was provided
between sets to minimize fatigue. In this study, a vertical load corresponding to 1% of body
weight, which was measured with an electronic scale, was placed bilaterally 3 cm above the
upper part of the lateral malleous. Muscle activity of the gluteus medius was measured by
MP36 (Biopac System Inc., USA). Treadmills (PRECOR c964i, USA) with inclinations that could
be automatically adjusted were used. The data collected in this study were analyzed using
SPSS version 19.0 for Windows. Repeated one-way ANOVA was used to compare the degrees of
contraction of the gluteus medius between different angles of inclination. The Bonferroni
correction was used as the post hoc test to examine differences between the groups. The
significance level was chosen as 0.05
RESULTS
During walking on a treadmill, the muscle activity values of the gluteus medius at 0° and
5° were 777.28±449.53 and 864.68±503.90. Therefore, the muscle activity of the gluteus
medius increased at the angle of inclination of 5°. However, the difference was not
significant. The value of contraction at 10° was 662.30±444.00 a significant decrease from
5° (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between 0° and 10°
(p<0.05; Table 1).
Table 1.
Comparison of gluteus medius muscle activity with inclination (unit:
%RVC)
0°
5°
10°
GM*
777.28±449.53
864.68±503.90
662.30±444.00†
*p<0.05, Mean±SD, GM: gluteus medius, VL: vertical load, †significant
difference between 5° and 10° (p<0.05)
*p<0.05, Mean±SD, GM: gluteus medius, VL: vertical load, †significant
difference between 5° and 10° (p<0.05)
DISCUSSION
In normal gait, the gluteus medius shows its maximum contractile force during mid-stance,
in the single-leg stance phase. In the single-leg stance phase, the gluteus medius contracts
efferently to restrict or decelerate the descent of the pelvis toward the swing phase
side8). Selective reinforce training of
the gluteus medius is helpful for improving the stability of the lower extremities and the
trunk while minimizing compensatory actions4). Additionally, it can reduce the action of the quadratus lumborum,
due to the weakening of the gluteus medius to prevent lateral tilting of the pelvis9). This study used various angles of
inclination with 1% body weight to examine the effects of inclination on the degree of
activation of the gluteus medius, to determine if the angle of inclination could be usefully
used for selective activation of the gluteus medius. The activity of the gluteus medius was
higher at 5° than at 0° inclination, but the difference was not significant. However, the
activity at 10° was significantly lower that of 5° inclination (p<0.05). Therefore,
although the gluteus medius is activated more when the angle of inclination is increased,
than when walking on flat land, the application of excessively large angles of inclination
decreases rather than increases the activation of the gluteus medius. This might occur
because the angle of inclination has been increased excessively, inducing compensatory
actions in other parts of the body, rather than activatig the gluteus medius. The movements
that appear when an agonist that moves a certain joint is weak, in which the agonist is
replaced by a congener, or the agonist is over-activated, are called compensation movements,
and these movements need to controlled for accuracy of movement10). A previous study indicated that when the last swing phase
is connected to the initial stance phase during walking on an ascending slope, the flexion
of the hip joint and the knee joint increases11). Walking on a slope requires more force to control the movements of
the lower extremities when the slope of the ground increases. For example, a study conducted
by Han12) reported that while ascending
stairs or slopes, the muscle activities of the medial gastrocnemius and the tibialis
anterior increased. Additionally, in an analysis of the muscle activity of the trunk muscles
and the quadriceps, Kim13) reported that
the muscle activity of the quadriceps increased as the angle of inclination increased. The
gluteus medius muscle regulated the pelvis of subjects at loads corresponding to 1% of their
weight. However, when the load on the lower extremity during the swing phase was increased
to 2% of the subject’s weight, in addition to the gluteus medius muscle regulating the
pelvis, the external oblique abdominal muscle and the internal oblique abdominal muscle
acted together to stabilize the trunk and to raise the lower extremities14). The fact that the activity of the gluteus
medius increased at 5° inclination compared to 0°, in the present study, means that
appropriate angles are effective for selective activation of the gluteus medius. Therefore,
for patients with weakened gluteus medius, engaging in gait training at angles of
inclination of approximately 5° with 1% body weight should be helpful for selectively
reinforcing the gluteus medius while simultnaeously preventing compensation movements.
Additionally, an inclination angle of 5° is more appropriate than no inclination or
excessively large angles.
Authors: M Fredericson; C L Cookingham; A M Chaudhari; B C Dowdell; N Oestreicher; S A Sahrmann Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 3.638