| Literature DB >> 25540119 |
Gemma Humm1, Saqib Noor, Philippa Bridgeman, Michael David, Deepa Bose.
Abstract
Surgical debridement and prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy are an established management strategy for infection after tibial fractures. Local antibiotic delivery via cement beads has shown improved outcome but requires further surgery for extraction of beads. OSTEOSET(®)-T is a resorbable bone void filler composed of calcium sulphate and 4 % tobramycin that is packed easily into bone defects. This is a review of the outcomes of 21 patients treated with OSTEOSET(®)-T for osteomyelitis of the tibia. This is a retrospective case note and clinical review. In all cases, the strategy was debridement, with removal of any implants, with excision back to bleeding bone. OSTEOSET(®)-T pellets were packed into any contained defects or the intra-medullary canal with further bony stabilisation (n = 9) and soft tissue reconstruction (n = 7) undertaken as required. Intravenous vancomycin and meropenem were administered after sampling with substitution to targeted antibiotic therapy for between 6 weeks and 6 months. The average follow-up was 15 months. Union rate after tibial reconstruction was 100 %. Wound complications were encountered in 52 %: a wound discharge in the early post-operative period was noted in seven patients (33 %) independent of site of pellet placement. In the 14 cases without a wound leak, five developed wound complications (p = 0.06, Fisher's exact test) either from delayed wound-healing or pin-site infections. One patient developed a transient acute kidney injury and one refractory osteomyelitis. OSTEOSET(®)-T is an effective adjunct in the treatment of chronic tibial osteomyelitis following trauma based on the low incidence of relapse of infection within the period of follow-up in this study, but significant wound complications and one transient nephrotoxic event were also recorded.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25540119 PMCID: PMC4278971 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-014-0206-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Fig. 1Cases of non-union and the presence of metal work
Causative organisms involved
| Organism | Cases | % |
|---|---|---|
| Polymicrobial | 4 | 19 |
| Coagulase-negative | 4 | 19 |
|
| 4 | 19 |
| Negative cultures | 3 | 14 |
| Other organisms | 6 | 29 |
| | 2 | |
| | 1 | |
| | 1 | |
| Mixed anaerobes | 1 | |
| | 1 |
Fig. 2Impact of site of placement of OSTEOSET®-T placement and the presence of a post-operative wound leak (p = 1.0, Fisher’s exact test)
Fig. 3Impact of wound leakage on healing (p = 0.06, Fisher’s exact test)
Fig. 4Pre-operative plain radiograph of the right distal tibal in a 57 year old male with chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis distal tibia
Fig. 5MRI appearances of chronic osteomyelitis of the right distal tibia
Fig. 6Intra-operative use of OSTEOSET®-T
Fig. 7Post-operative plain radiograph of right distal tibia packed with OSTEOSET®-T
Fig. 8Plain radiograph of the right distal tibia following second stage bone grafting