| Literature DB >> 25539724 |
Amy R Ellison1, Tate Tunstall2, Graziella V DiRenzo2, Myra C Hughey3, Eria A Rebollar4, Lisa K Belden3, Reid N Harris4, Roberto Ibáñez5, Karen R Lips2, Kelly R Zamudio6.
Abstract
The amphibian-killing chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is one of the most generalist pathogens known, capable of infecting hundreds of species globally and causing widespread population declines and extinctions. However, some host species are seemingly unaffected by Bd, tolerating or clearing infections without clinical signs of disease. Variation in host immune responses is commonly evoked for these resistant or tolerant species, yet to date, we have no direct comparison of amphibian species responses to infection at the level of gene expression. In this study, we challenged four Central American frog species that vary in Bd susceptibility, with a sympatric virulent strain of the pathogen. We compared skin and spleen orthologous gene expression using differential expression tests and coexpression gene network analyses. We found that resistant species have reduced skin inflammatory responses and increased expression of genes involved in skin integrity. In contrast, only highly susceptible species exhibited suppression of splenic T-cell genes. We conclude that resistance to chytridiomycosis may be related to a species' ability to escape the immunosuppressive activity of the fungus. Moreover, our results indicate that within-species differences in splenic proteolytic enzyme gene expression may contribute to intraspecific variation in survival. This first comparison of amphibian functional immunogenomic architecture in response to Bd provides insights into key genetic mechanisms underlying variation in disease outcomes among amphibian species.Entities:
Keywords: Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis; amphibian immunity; comparative transcriptomics; immunogenomics; immunosuppression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25539724 PMCID: PMC4316636 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
Summary of Treatment Group Sizes, De Novo Transcriptome Assembly Statistics, and Numbers of Differentially Expressed Genes
| Species | Average Bd load (SE) | Average reads per sampled | Assembly N50 | No. of annotated genes | No. of DEe orthologousf genes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin | Spleen | |||||||||
| 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 6,819,500 (2,431,929) | 25.9 × 106 | 1,596 | 12,056 | 3,849 | 2,291 | |
| 3 | 9 (6) | 3 (2) | 2 | 3,353 (1,412) | 22.9 × 106 | 1,289 | 13,409 | 901 | 452 | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 102,998 (57,652) | 20.3 × 106 | 1,704 | 12,409 | 1,413 | 2,660 | |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 27 (23) | 27.4 × 106 | 1,230 | 12,929 | 6 | 182 | |
aBd load of 1 or more zoospore genomical equivalents (GE) at death or end of experiment. Numbers in parentheses indicate N of spleen due to sample removal due to low quality RNA.
bBd load of 1 or more zoospore GE during experiment but was no longer infected at the end of the experiment. Numbers in parentheses indicate N of spleen due to sample removal due to low quality RNA.
cExhibited clinical signs of cytridiomycosis, lost righting reflex, and euthanized prior to the end of the experiment.
dAfter read quality control filtering and trimming.
eDifferential expression in control versus infected comparison, ≤0.05 FDR corrected P value.
fDefined by reciprocal best hits among all species pairs (total 8,732 genes).
FVenn diagrams of differentially expressed genes in spleen and skin tissues between control and infected frogs. GO term enrichment of groups is summarized in table 2. Photos courtesy of Brian Gratwicke. (A) Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes in spleen and skin tissues between control and infected frogs. GO term enrichment of groups is summarized in table 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of all orthologous gene expression data in (B) skin and (C) spleen.
Summary of Significant Biological Process GO Term Enrichment in Species-Specific and Shared Differentially Expressed Genes
| Group | No. of Genes | No. of Enriched GO Terms | Selected Biological Process GO Term Enrichment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spleen up | |||
| Azet | 882 | 122 | Response to wounding, inflammatory response, apoptosis |
| Agly | 78 | 3 | Activation of phospholipase C activity |
| Cfit | 1,484 | 64 | Mitosis, transcription, regulation of apoptosis |
| Acal | 44 | 1 | Immune response |
| Azet-Agly | 214 | 5 | Cell adhesion, immune response, regulation of cell proliferation |
| Agly-Cfit | 23 | 10 | Cell cycle process, mitosis |
| Spleen down | |||
| Azet | 674 | 5 | Transcription, protein complex assembly |
| Cfit | 670 | 91 | Apoptosis, leukocyte activation, inflammatory response, cell adhesion |
| Azet-Cfit | 193 | 29 | Leukocyte differentiation, T-cell activation, metal ion homeostasis |
| Skin up | |||
| Azet | 1,235 | 57 | Apoptosis, endocytosis, positive regulation of I-κB/NF-κB cascade |
| Cfit | 346 | 3 | Mitotic cell cycle |
| Azet-Agly | 251 | 15 | Response to wounding, inflammatory response, regulation of apoptosis |
| Azet-Cfit | 277 | 18 | Inflammatory response, T-cell activation, apoptosis |
| Azet-Agly-Cfit | 259 | 51 | Inflammatory response, immunoglobulin immunity, complement activation |
| Skin down | |||
| Azet | 1,421 | 58 | Mitosis, cell adhesion, positive regulation of apoptosis |
| Cfit | 288 | 4 | Transcription |
| Azet-Agly | 193 | 5 | Skeletal system development, regionalization |
| Azet-Cfit | 145 | 1 | Epithelium development |
Note.—Azet = Atelopus zeteki; Agly = Atelopus glyphus; Cfit = Craugastor fitzingeri; Acal = Agalychnis callidryas. Full lists of GO terms are provided in supplementary materials.
Summary of Gene Coexpression modules defined by WGCNA
| Module | No. of Genes | Bd Load Correlation | Hub Gene FCa | Top Enrichmentb | Top 5 Hub Genesc | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preservationd | Hub Gene FCa | Preservationd | Hub gene FCa | Preservationd | Hub gene FCa | |||||||
| Skin | ||||||||||||
| SK1 | 947 | 0.88 | 9.00 × 10−4 | +0.08 | Cell adhesion | 13 ( | −0.26 | 6 ( | −0.58 | 9 ( | −0.48 | |
| Spleen | ||||||||||||
| SP1 | 1,234 | −0.72 | 0.02 | −0.20 | Immune response | 2 ( | −0.05 | 2 ( | +0.31 | 3 ( | +0.41 | |
| SP2 | 154 | −0.77 | 0.009 | −0.22 | Immune response | 7 (−2.38) | −0.34 | 6 (−1.20) | +0.38 | 4 ( | +0.81 | |
| SP3 | 145 | 0.84 | 0.002 | +1.00 | Regulation of T-cell activation | 3 (0.00) | −1.01 | 1 ( | −0.42 | 1 ( | −0.50 | |
Note.—Full lists of enriched GO terms are provided in supplementary materials. Significant values in italics.
aMedian log2 fold change of module hub genes (based on top 150 node connections).
bMost significantly enriched GO biological process term.
cFive most interconnected genes.
dMedian ranked preservation (Z summary preservation; ≥2 = weak to moderate preservation, ≥10 = high preservation).
FNetwork view of Agalychnis callidryas SP3 spleen module (T-cell activation) hub genes. Nodes are labeled with official gene symbols when available. Edge line width represents connection strength (weight); thicker lines denote stronger connections. Node size is proportional to number connections. Node color represents the log2 fold change between control and infected frogs (clockwise from top left; A. callidryas, Atelopus glyphus, Atelopus zeteki, Craugastor fitingeri). Node borders represent differential gene expression results. Black = nonsignificant (after FDR correction); red = decreased expression in the infected; green = increased expression in the infected. Photos courtesy of Brian Gratwicke.