Martin J Abrahamson1. 1. Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA martin.abrahamson@joslin.harvard.edu.
Abstract
Since their introduction to clinical practice in the 1950s, sulfonylureas have been widely prescribed for use in patients with type 2 diabetes. Of all the other medications currently available for clinical use, only metformin has been used more frequently. However, several new drug classes have emerged that are reported to have equal glucose-lowering efficacy and greater safety when added to treatment of patients in whom metformin monotherapy is no longer sufficient. Moreover, current arguments also suggest that the alternative drugs may be superior to sulfonylureas with regard to the risk of cardiovascular complications. Thus, while there is universal agreement that metformin should remain the first-line pharmacologic therapy for those in whom lifestyle modification is insufficient to control hyperglycemia, there is no consensus as to which drug should be added to metformin. Therefore, given the current controversy, we provide a Point-Counterpoint on this issue. In the point narrative presented below, Dr. Abrahamson provides his argument suggesting that avoiding use of sulfonylureas as a class of medication as an add-on to metformin is not appropriate as there are many patients whose glycemic control would improve with use of these drugs with minimal risk of adverse events. In the following counterpoint narrative, Dr. Genuth suggests there is no longer a need for sulfonylureas to remain a first-line addition to metformin for those patients whose clinical characteristics are appropriate and whose health insurance and/or financial resources make an alternative drug affordable.
Since their introduction to clinical practice in the 1950s, sulfonylureas have been widely prescribed for use in patients with type 2 diabetes. Of all the other medications currently available for clinical use, only metformin has been used more frequently. However, several new drug classes have emerged that are reported to have equal glucose-lowering efficacy and greater safety when added to treatment of patients in whom metformin monotherapy is no longer sufficient. Moreover, current arguments also suggest that the alternative drugs may be superior to sulfonylureas with regard to the risk of cardiovascular complications. Thus, while there is universal agreement that metformin should remain the first-line pharmacologic therapy for those in whom lifestyle modification is insufficient to control hyperglycemia, there is no consensus as to which drug should be added to metformin. Therefore, given the current controversy, we provide a Point-Counterpoint on this issue. In the point narrative presented below, Dr. Abrahamson provides his argument suggesting that avoiding use of sulfonylureas as a class of medication as an add-on to metformin is not appropriate as there are many patients whose glycemic control would improve with use of these drugs with minimal risk of adverse events. In the following counterpoint narrative, Dr. Genuth suggests there is no longer a need for sulfonylureas to remain a first-line addition to metformin for those patients whose clinical characteristics are appropriate and whose health insurance and/or financial resources make an alternative drug affordable.
Authors: Jea Young Min; Marie R Griffin; Adriana M Hung; Carlos G Grijalva; Robert A Greevy; Xulei Liu; Tom Elasy; Christianne L Roumie Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William T Cefalu; Andrew J M Boulton; Andrew J M Boulton; Robert G Moses; Derek LeRoith; Eddie L Greene; Frank B Hu; George Bakris; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Julio Rosenstock; Katie Weinger; Lawrence Blonde; Mary de Groot; Matthew C Riddle; Robert Henry; Sherita Hill Golden; Stephen Rich; Lyn Reynolds Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sanjay Kalra; Silver Bahendeka; Rakesh Sahay; Sujoy Ghosh; Fariduddin Md; Abbas Orabi; Kaushik Ramaiya; Sameer Al Shammari; Dina Shrestha; Khalid Shaikh; Sachitha Abhayaratna; Pradeep K Shrestha; Aravinthan Mahalingam; Mazen Askheta; Aly Ahmed A Rahim; Fatimah Eliana; Hari K Shrestha; Sandeep Chaudhary; Nancy Ngugi; Jean Claude Mbanya; Than Than Aye; Tint Swe Latt; Zhanay A Akanov; Abbas Raza Syed; Nikhil Tandon; A G Unnikrishnan; S V Madhu; Ali Jawa; Subhankar Chowdhury; Sarita Bajaj; Ashok Kumar Das Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018 Jan-Feb
Authors: T V Devarajan; S Venkataraman; Narayanan Kandasamy; Abraham Oomman; Hari Kishan Boorugu; S K P Karuppiah; Dushyant Balat Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017 Sep-Oct
Authors: Brian Godman; Debashis Basu; Yogan Pillay; Julius C Mwita; Godfrey Mutashambara Rwegerera; Bene D Anand Paramadhas; Celda Tiroyakgosi; Patrick Mbah Okwen; Loveline Lum Niba; Justice Nonvignon; Israel Sefah; Margaret Oluka; Anastasia N Guantai; Dan Kibuule; Francis Kalemeera; Mwangana Mubita; Joseph Fadare; Olayinka O Ogunleye; Larry A Distiller; Enos M Rampamba; Jeffrey Wing; Debjani Mueller; Abubakr Alfadl; Adefolarin A Amu; Zinhle Matsebula; Aubrey Kalungia; Trust Zaranyika; Nyasha Masuka; Janney Wale; Ruaraidh Hill; Amanj Kurdi; Angela Timoney; Stephen Campbell; Johanna C Meyer Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 5.810