Literature DB >> 25538176

Three-year follow-up of advanced melanoma patients who received ipilimumab plus fotemustine in the Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT)-M1 phase II study.

A M Di Giacomo1, P A Ascierto2, P Queirolo3, L Pilla4, R Ridolfi5, M Santinami6, A Testori7, E Simeone2, M Guidoboni5, A Maurichi6, L Orgiano3, G Spadola7, M Del Vecchio8, R Danielli1, L Calabrò1, D Annesi1, D Giannarelli9, C Maccalli10, E Fonsatti1, G Parmiani4, M Maio11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the NIBIT-M1 study, we reported a promising activity of ipilimumab combined with fotemustine in metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with or without brain metastases. To corroborate these initial findings, we now investigated the long-term efficacy of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis captured the 3-year outcome of MM patients who received ipilimumab combined with fotemustine as first- or second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS), 3-year survival rates, immune-related (ir) progression-free survival (irPFS), brain PFS, and ir duration of response (irDOR) for the entire population and for patients with brain metastases were assessed. Clinical results were correlated with circulating CD3(+)CD4(+)ICOS(+)CD45RO(+) or CD45RA(+) T cells, neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratios, and tumorBRAF-V600 mutational status.
RESULTS: Eighty-six MM patients, including 20 with asymptomatic brain metastases that had been pre-treated with radiotherapy in 7 subjects, were enrolled in the study. With a median follow-up of 39.9 months, median OS and 3-year survival rates were 12.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1-18.7 months] and 28.5% for the whole study population, and 12.7 months (95% CI 2.7-22.7 months) and 27.8% for patients with brain metastases, respectively. Long-term ir adverse events consisting of G1 rush and pruritus occurred in 21% of patients. The absolute increase from baseline to week 12 in 'memory' but not in 'naïve' T cells identified patients with a better survival (P = 0.002). The N/L ratio correlated with a significantly better survival at early time points. BRAF status did not correlate with clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term analysis of the NIBIT-M1 trial continues to demonstrate efficacy of ipilimumab combined with fotemustine in MM patients. Fotemustine does not seem to impair the immunologic activity of ipilimumab. EUDRACT NUMBER: 2010-019356-50. CINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01654692.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTLA-4; fotemustine; immunotherapy; ipilimumab; metastatic melanoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25538176     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  50 in total

Review 1.  Are immune checkpoint blockade monoclonal antibodies active against CNS metastases from NSCLC?-current evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Grainne M O'Kane; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

2.  Immunological markers and clinical outcome of advanced melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab plus fotemustine in the NIBIT-M1 study.

Authors:  Cristina Maccalli; Diana Giannarelli; Filippo Capocefalo; Lorenzo Pilla; Ester Fonsatti; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Giorgio Parmiani; Michele Maio
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Tumor-Localized Secretion of Soluble PD1 Enhances Oncolytic Virotherapy.

Authors:  Mee Y Bartee; Katherine M Dunlap; Eric Bartee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Cure in Advanced Renal Cell Cancer: Is It an Achievable Goal?

Authors:  Dhanusha Sabanathan; John J Park; Manuel Marquez; Louise Francisco; Natalie Byrne; Howard Gurney
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 5.  Trial watch: Immune checkpoint blockers for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Claire Vanpouille-Box; Claire Lhuillier; Lucillia Bezu; Fernando Aranda; Takahiro Yamazaki; Oliver Kepp; Jitka Fucikova; Radek Spisek; Sandra Demaria; Silvia C Formenti; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  Cancer Immunotherapy Getting Brainy: Visualizing the Distinctive CNS Metastatic Niche to Illuminate Therapeutic Resistance.

Authors:  Mark Owyong; Niloufar Hosseini-Nassab; Gizem Efe; Alexander Honkala; Renske J E van den Bijgaart; Vicki Plaks; Bryan Ronain Smith
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 7.  Current chemotherapeutic regimens for brain metastases treatment.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Nam; Barbara J O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 8.  Leptomeningeal Metastases.

Authors:  Jerome J Graber; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-01-23

9.  Real-world analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, survival rates, and prognostic factors in patients with melanoma brain metastases in China.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Bin Lian; Lu Si; ZhiHong Chi; XiNan Sheng; Xuan Wang; LiLi Mao; BiXia Tang; SiMing Li; XieQiao Yan; Xue Bai; Li Zhou; ChuanLiang Cui; Jun Guo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  [Melanoma brain metastases : Treatment options].

Authors:  R Rauschenberg; G Tabatabai; E G C Troost; M Garzarolli; S Beissert; F Meier
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.