Literature DB >> 25537617

[Spinal anesthesia in high-volume, low-concentration technique for Caesarean sections : Retrospective analysis].

J Jokinen1, V Adametz, M Kredel, R M Muellenbach, A Hönig, A Wöckel, J Dietl, N Roewer, P Kranke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays Caesarean sections are mainly undertaken using spinal anesthesia; therefore, it is important to minimize potential side effects and risks associated with this technique. Currently, many studies have been conducted to optimize the dose of local anesthetics to avoid hypotension, which often occurs during spinal anesthesia. AIM: In a retrospective study design the high-volume, low-concentration technique with up to 12 ml isobaric bupivacain 0.1% (1 mg/ml) and sufentanil (1 µg/ml), which has been used at the University Hospital Würzburg for many years was analyzed with respect to reliability and side effects. The use of this technique so far is unique among university hospitals in Germany.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 1424 anesthesia protocols from 2001 to 2007 a total of 1368 were analyzed. Demographic data and parameters, such as location of puncture, dose and extent of anesthesia, hemodynamic stability and additional medication were recorded. A decrease of systolic blood pressure of more than 20% of the initial value was defined as hypotension.
RESULTS: The median volume used for spinal anesthesia was 9 ml, containing 9 mg bupivacaine and 9 µg sufentanil. The rate of hypotension was 48.8 %. No significant differences in hypotension between lower and higher volumes were detectable. In 0.84% (n=12) of the cases the procedure had to be changed to general anesthesia and additional analgesia was administered in 3 cases (0.22%).
CONCLUSION: The high-volume, low-concentration technique is an effective approach for spinal anesthesia with a small number of cases needing general anesthesia or additional analgesics. The rate of hypotension was moderate compared to other studies; however, because of the retrospective and non-randomized study design the dependence of this rate on dose and given volume should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537617     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-014-2408-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  22 in total

1.  Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  B Ben-David; G Miller; R Gavriel; A Gurevitch
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Limiting the dose of local anaesthetic for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia--has the limbo bar been set too low?

Authors:  M W M Rucklidge; M J Paech
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics.

Authors:  Marc Van de Velde; Dominique Van Schoubroeck; Jacques Jani; An Teunkens; Carlo Missant; J Deprest
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension.

Authors:  Eva Roofthooft; Marc Van de Velde
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.706

5.  Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section.

Authors:  G Dahlgren; C Hultstrand; J Jakobsson; M Norman; E W Eriksson; H Martin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  W H L Teoh; E Thomas; H M Tan
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 2.603

Review 7.  Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Arzola; P M Wieczorek
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Serene Leo; Ban Leong Sng; Yvonne Lim; Alex T H Sia
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion.

Authors:  Eldrid Langesaeter; Leiv Arne Rosseland; Audun Stubhaug
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery.

Authors:  Gregory L Bryson; Robert Macneil; Leo M Jeyaraj; Ola P Rosaeg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  2 in total

1.  Large Dose Bupivacaine 0.5% versus Small Dose in Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Hassan Mohamed Ali; Ahmed Abdelaziz Ismail
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2019-12-16

2.  The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight®) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section-A Retrospective Validation Study.

Authors:  Philipp Helmer; Daniel Helf; Michael Sammeth; Bernd Winkler; Sebastian Hottenrott; Patrick Meybohm; Peter Kranke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.