Literature DB >> 19843797

A randomized comparison of low doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Serene Leo1, Ban Leong Sng, Yvonne Lim, Alex T H Sia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the block characteristics of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 7, 8, or 9 mg administered during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery and to elucidate the dose that produces adequate sensory blockade for surgery while minimizing the incidence of hypotension, high neuroblockade, and the need for intraoperative epidural supplementation.
METHODS: Sixty women presenting for elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to one of the 3 groups. Group 7 received intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 7 mg, Group 8 received 8 mg, and Group 9 received 9 mg. Women in all 3 groups received intrathecal morphine 100 microg and IV hydroxyethyl starch 15 mL/kg at the time of initiation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Surgery began when a sensory level of T4 was achieved. Patients were monitored for block characteristics and side effects by a blinded observer. Our primary outcome was the maximum cephalad sensory block height.
RESULTS: There was a difference in the maximum extent of cephalad sensory block among groups (Group 7: median T2 [interquartile range T2-T3]; Group 8: median T2 [T1-T2]; Group 9: median T1 [C8-T2]; P = 0.02). However, the time taken to reach T4 was similar in all 3 groups. The incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors was different among groups (30% in Group 7, 55% in Group 8, and 70% in Group 9; P = 0.04). No patient had inadequate anesthesia. Neonatal outcomes were similar in all 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: The lowest dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine (7 mg) provided equally rapid onset and effective anesthesia for cesarean delivery while reducing the incidence of hypotension compared with 8 and 9 mg. However, because of its shorter duration of anesthesia, it may be feasible only when the block can be reinforced using a functional epidural catheter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843797     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72d35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  15 in total

1.  Influence of lateral decubitus positioning after combined use of hyperbaric and hypobaric ropivacaine on hemodynamic characteristics in spinal anesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Zhe-Feng Quan; Hai-Li He; Ming Tian; Ping Chi; Xin Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  [Spinal anesthesia in high-volume, low-concentration technique for Caesarean sections : Retrospective analysis].

Authors:  J Jokinen; V Adametz; M Kredel; R M Muellenbach; A Hönig; A Wöckel; J Dietl; N Roewer; P Kranke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Ilkben Gunusen; Semra Karaman; Asuman Sargin; Vicdan Firat
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Alicia T Dennis; Allan M Cyna; Matthew G Richardson; Matthew R Bright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 5.  Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Laurent Lonjaret; Olivier Lairez; Vincent Minville; Thomas Geeraerts
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2014-09-12

6.  ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural in severely preeclamptic patients.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Wen-Ping Xu; Xiao-Min Zhang; Yin-Fa Zhang; Li-Zhong Wang; Xin-Zhong Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

Authors:  H Virgin; E Oddby; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

8.  How Low Can We Go? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Bupivacaine 5 mg and Bupivacaine 7.5 mg for Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery in Indonesian Population.

Authors:  Susilo Chandra; Alfan Mahdi Nugroho; Henry Agus; Astrid Pratidina Susilo
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-04-27

9.  The effects of spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section on uterine and umbilical arterial pulsatility indexes in normotensive and chronic hypertensive pregnant women: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Luís Guedes-Martins; Helena Graça; Joaquim P Saraiva; Luísa Guedes; Rita Gaio; Ana S Cerdeira; Filipe Macedo; Henrique Almeida
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  The Dose-response of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Co-administered with Sufentanil for Cesarean Delivery under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Scarred Uterus.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Wen-Ping Xu; Yin-Fa Zhang; Lin Liu; Xia Liu; Li-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.