Literature DB >> 25537349

Moving beyond attendance: lessons learned from assessing engagement in afterschool contexts.

Jennifer A Fredricks1, Amy M Bohnert, Kimberly Burdette.   

Abstract

Youth engagement is the least researched, but potentially most important, aspect of participation in afterschool programs. The level of youth engagement can vary across programs, across youth within a program, and within individual youth over time. Engagement is important for both recruiting and retaining participants, and has been associated with more positive academic outcomes over time. This chapter integrates perspectives from practitioners, researchers, and the school engagement literature. Reasons why engagement is an important dimension of afterschool programming, different methods for assessing engagement, key features of engaging afterschool programs, and implications for practice are also outlined.
© 2014 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25537349     DOI: 10.1002/yd.20112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Dir Youth Dev        ISSN: 1533-8916


  6 in total

1.  After-School Program for urban youth: Evaluation of a health careers course in New York City high schools.

Authors:  Lynne Holden; Wallace Berger; Rebecca Zingarelli; Elliot Siegel
Journal:  Inf Serv Use       Date:  2015

2.  The Role of Youth Trainee-Trainer Alliance and Involvement in School-Based Prevention: A Moderated-Mediation Model of Student Gatekeeper Suicide Prevention Training.

Authors:  Christine M Wienke Totura; Christa D Labouliere; Kim Gryglewicz; Marc S Karver
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2019-03

Review 3.  Promoting Nurturing Environments in Afterschool Settings.

Authors:  Emilie Phillips Smith; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Promoting Afterschool Quality and Positive Youth Development: Cluster Randomized Trial of the Pax Good Behavior Game.

Authors:  Emilie Phillips Smith; D Wayne Osgood; Yoonkyung Oh; Linda C Caldwell
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-02

5.  Engagement in video and audio narratives: contrasting self-report and physiological measures.

Authors:  Daniel C Richardson; Nicole K Griffin; Lara Zaki; Auburn Stephenson; Jiachen Yan; Thomas Curry; Richard Noble; John Hogan; Jeremy I Skipper; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Kirkpatrick Model Process Evaluation of Reactions and Learning from My Strengths Training for Life™.

Authors:  Mary L Quinton; Grace Tidmarsh; Benjamin J Parry; Jennifer Cumming
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.