Literature DB >> 25536464

Temporal properties of material categorization and material rating: visual vs non-visual material features.

Takehiro Nagai1, Toshiki Matsushima2, Kowa Koida3, Yusuke Tani2, Michiteru Kitazaki2, Shigeki Nakauchi2.   

Abstract

Humans can visually recognize material categories of objects, such as glass, stone, and plastic, easily. However, little is known about the kinds of surface quality features that contribute to such material class recognition. In this paper, we examine the relationship between perceptual surface features and material category discrimination performance for pictures of materials, focusing on temporal aspects, including reaction time and effects of stimulus duration. The stimuli were pictures of objects with an identical shape but made of different materials that could be categorized into seven classes (glass, plastic, metal, stone, wood, leather, and fabric). In a pre-experiment, observers rated the pictures on nine surface features, including visual (e.g., glossiness and transparency) and non-visual features (e.g., heaviness and warmness), on a 7-point scale. In the main experiments, observers judged whether two simultaneously presented pictures were classified as the same or different material category. Reaction times and effects of stimulus duration were measured. The results showed that visual feature ratings were correlated with material discrimination performance for short reaction times or short stimulus durations, while non-visual feature ratings were correlated only with performance for long reaction times or long stimulus durations. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying visual and non-visual feature processing may differ in terms of processing time, although the cause is unclear. Visual surface features may mainly contribute to material recognition in daily life, while non-visual features may contribute only weakly, if at all.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Material category; Material perception; Psychophysics; Surface feature

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25536464     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

Review 1.  On the Questionable Appeal of Glossy/Shiny Food Packaging.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  Dynamic Visual Cues for Differentiating Mirror and Glass.

Authors:  Hideki Tamura; Hiroshi Higashi; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The joint role of geometry and illumination on material recognition.

Authors:  Manuel Lagunas; Ana Serrano; Diego Gutierrez; Belen Masia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Quantification of Visual Texture and Presentation of Intermediate Visual Texture by Spatial Mixing.

Authors:  Yuta Yoshimizu; Hiroki Yasuga; Eiji Iwase
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.