Literature DB >> 25535665

Comparison among the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, and oral glucose tolerance test for assessment of insulin sensitivity in healthy Standardbreds.

Shannon E Pratt-Phillips1, Ray J Geor, L Jill McCutcheon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in horses, estimates of insulin sensitivity obtained from minimal model analysis (MMA) of a frequently sampled IV glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT) with estimates from the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (EHC) and to evaluate the validity of surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity derived from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). ANIMALS: 18 mature Standardbreds (mean ± SD body weight, 428.9 ± 35.9 kg; mean ± SD body condition score, 4.4 ± 1.0 [on a scale of 1 to 9]). PROCEDURES: All horses underwent at least 2 of the 3 procedures (EHC [n = 15], insulin-modified FSIGTT [18], and OGTT [18]) within a 10-day time frame to evaluate insulin sensitivity.
RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity variables derived from the EHC and FSIGTT were strongly correlated (r = 0.88). When standardized to the same units of measure, these measures were still strongly correlated (r = 0.86) but were not equivalent. Area under the curve, peak insulin concentration, insulin concentration at 120 minutes, and 2 calculated indices from glucose and insulin data from the OGTT were significantly correlated with the EHC- and FSIGTT-derived estimates of insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In healthy Standardbreds with moderate body condition score, insulin sensitivities from the EHC and FSIGTT were strongly correlated but not equivalent. Estimates derived from an OGTT also may be useful to estimate insulin sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25535665     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.76.1.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  A modified oral sugar test for evaluation of insulin and glucose dynamics in horses.

Authors:  Sanna Lindåse; Katarina Nostell; Johan Bröjer
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Evaluation of Four Diagnostic Tests for Insulin Dysregulation in Adult Light-Breed Horses.

Authors:  L K Dunbar; K A Mielnicki; K A Dembek; R E Toribio; T A Burns
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Relationship Between β-cell Response and Insulin Sensitivity in Horses based on the Oral Sugar Test and the Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp.

Authors:  S Lindåse; K Nostell; J Söder; J Bröjer
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Andy E Durham; Nicholas Frank; Cathy M McGowan; Nicola J Menzies-Gow; Ellen Roelfsema; Ingrid Vervuert; Karsten Feige; Kerstin Fey
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Investigating the Relationship Between Cardiac Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Horses: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Natasha J Williams; Martin Furr; Cristobal Navas de Solis; Allison Campolo; Michael Davis; Véronique A Lacombe
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.