Literature DB >> 25535457

Influence of preoperative velar closing ratio and lateral wall movement on outcomes of Furlow palatoplasty for velopharyngeal incompetence.

Arshad R Muzaffar1, Gale Rice1, Bradley Hubbard1, Elizabeth Killion1.   

Abstract

Currently, there is no consensus regarding how to determine the optimal surgical procedure for a patient with velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) post-primary palate repair. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of preoperative velar closing ratio (VCR) and lateral wall movement (LWM) on nasal emission and hypernasality after Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty. A retrospective analysis involving patients with VPI post-primary palatoplasty whose VPI was treated with double-opposing Z-plasty by a single surgeon was performed. Ten consecutive patients with VPI postpalatoplasty were reviewed. Videonasendoscopy, videofluoroscopy and perceptual speech examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. VCR improved from an mean of 0.5 preoperatively (range 0.1 to 0.95) to 0.9 postoperatively (range 0.55 to 1.0). Postoperative mean LWM was 0.5 (range 0.3 to 0.9), unchanged from preoperative ratings. A trend toward an inverse relationship between preoperative VCR and improvement in hypernasality and resolution of nasal emission was observed. No relationship was noted between the degree of preoperative LWM and mean improvement in hypernasality. However, patients with worse preoperative LWM experienced better resolution of nasal emission postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty; Lateral wall movement; Velar closing ratio; Velopharyngeal insufficiency

Year:  2014        PMID: 25535457      PMCID: PMC4271748          DOI: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  6 in total

1.  Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group.

Authors:  K J Golding-Kushner; R V Argamaso; R T Cotton; L M Grames; G Henningsson; D L Jones; M P Karnell; P G Klaiman; M L Lewin; J L Marsh
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1990-10

2.  Furlow palatoplasty for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a prospective study of 148 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Jonathan A Perkins; Charlotte W Lewis; Joseph S Gruss; Linda E Eblen; Kathleen C Y Sie
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Correction of secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients with the Furlow palatoplasty.

Authors:  P K Chen; J T Wu; Y R Chen; M S Noordhoff
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Frequency of pharyngoplasty after primary repair of cleft palate.

Authors:  Sean Bicknell; Leland R McFadden; John B Curran
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Management of the black hole in velopharyngeal incompetence: combined use of a Furlow palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: a 29-year assessment of one surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Stephen R Sullivan; Eileen M Marrinan; Richard A LaBrie; Gary F Rogers; John B Mulliken
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.046

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.