| Literature DB >> 25534956 |
Simon W Young1, Henry D Clarke1, Stephen E Graves2, Yen-Liang Liu3, Richard N de Steiger2.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) systems permit a degree of femoro-tibial component size mismatch. The effect of mismatched components on revision rates has not been evaluated in a large study. We reviewed 21,906 fixed-bearing PFC Sigma primary TKAs using the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, dividing patients into three groups: no femoro-tibial size mismatch, tibial component size > femoral component size, and femoral component > tibial component. Revision rates were higher when the femoral size was greater than the tibia, compared to both equal size (HR = 1.20 (1.00, 1.45), P = 0.047) and to tibial size greater than femoral (HR = 1.60 (1.08, 2.37), P = 0.019). Potential mechanisms to explain these findings include edge loading of polyethylene and increased tibial component stresses.Entities:
Keywords: component size; registry; revision rates; size mismatch; total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25534956 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757