Literature DB >> 25534240

Transalveolar sinus floor elevation using osteotomes without grafting in severely atrophic maxilla: a 5-year prospective study.

Ying-Xin Gu1, Jun-Yu Shi1, Long-Fei Zhuang1, Shu-Jiao Qian1, Jia-Ji Mo1, Hong-Chang Lai1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical success of dental implants placed in severely atrophic maxilla (residual bone height ≤4 mm) using transalveolar sinus floor elevation (TSFE) without grafting. Furthermore, the implant stability during the healing period was also evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty five generally healthy patients with 37 Straumann(®) Standard Plus SLA implants were included in the study. After a modified Summers TSFE without grafting was performed, the smooth collar was embedded 0.5-1 mm beneath the cortical bone level. Follow-ups were conducted at 12, 36, and 60 months after crown placement. Implant survival rate, resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: At 5-year follow-up, 35 implants fulfilled the survival criteria, representing a 5-year cumulative survival rate of 94.6% at implant level and 92% at subject level. The mean value of implant stability quotient (ISQ) ranged from 67.8 to 72.8, and the lowest values were reached at 4 weeks. No significant difference was found with the passage of time in modified plaque index (P = 0.92), pocket probing depth (P = 0.34), and modified bleeding index (P = 0.4). The average residual bone height was 2.81 mm (SD: 0.74 mm) in this study. The average crestal bone loss (CBL) significantly increased from 0.83 mm at 1-year examination to 1.47 mm at 3-year examination (P < 0.001). The average CBL remained stable at years 3 and 5 (1.47 vs. 1.54 mm, P = 0.083).
CONCLUSION: According to the current evidence, it is feasible to place cylindrical implants in severely atrophic maxilla. High survival rate could be achieved following TSFE without grafting at least within 5-year follow-up.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implants; survival rates; transalveolar sinus floor elevation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25534240     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  11 in total

1.  [Retrospective study on transcrestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implantation of short implants].

Authors:  Jiang-Qin Huang; Chang-Qi Hu; Xun Xia; Shui-Gen Guo; Jin-Mei Gong; Hong-Wu Wei
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Novel Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation Technique.

Authors:  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Zeinab Zamani; Reza Amid
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 3.  The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Zhe-Zhen Lin; Yan-Qing Jiao; Zhang-Yan Ye; Ge-Ge Wang; Xi Ding
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  Transalveolar sinus floor lift without bone grafting in atrophic maxilla: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingdong Yan; Ruimin Liu; Shuting Bai; Min Wang; Haibin Xia; Jiang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Clinical evaluation of modified transalveolar sinus floor elevation and osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xu Zhao; Wei Gao; Feng Liu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Andrés-García; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Pedro Bullón; Javier Fernández-Farhall; Alberto Gómez-Menchero; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Influence of anatomical factors related to maxillary sinus on outcomes of transcrestal sinus floor elevation.

Authors:  Xiaofei Zheng; Lirong Huang; Si Huang; Anchun Mo; Juanfang Zhu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.080

8.  Clinical Outcome of Dental Implants after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with and without Bone Grafting: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Authors:  Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Pier Paolo Poli; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Carlo Maiorana; Davide Farronato; Silvio Taschieri
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Shi; Ying-Xin Gu; Shi-Chong Qiao; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Outcomes of implants placed after osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of single-arm studies.

Authors:  Mingfu Ye; Wenjun Liu; Shaolong Cheng; Lihui Yan
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.