| Literature DB >> 25532842 |
Julia Cassani1, Ana María Dorantes-Barrón2, Lilian Mayagoitia Novales3, Guadalupe Alva Real4, Rosa Estrada-Reyes5.
Abstract
We evaluated the antidepressant-like effect of kaempferitrin (Km) isolated from the plant Justicia spicigera (Asteraceae), which is used in traditional medicine for relieving emotional disorders, such as "la tristeza" (sadness or dysthymia) and "el humor" (mood changes). The actions of Km were evaluated in a forced swimming test (FST) and a suspension tail test (TST) in mice. We explored the involvement of the serotonergic system and the hypothalamic-hypophysis-adrenal axis (HPA) in the antidepressant-like effect of Km. To evaluate nonspecific effects of Km on general activity, the open field test (OFT) was performed. Km at 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg induced an antidepressant-like effect. Sub-effective dose of Km (1 mg/kg) produced a synergistic effect with imipramine (6.25 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) but not with desipramine (3.12 mg/kg). Pretreatment with p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (PCPA), a serotonin synthesis inhibitor, N-{2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexecarboxamide (WAY-100635), a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, and 8OH-DPAT, a selective 5-HT1A agonist, but not pindolol (10 mg/kg) blocked the anti- immobility effect induced by Km. Taken together, these results indicate that the antidepressant-like effect of Km is related to the serotonergic system, principally 5-HT1A. This effect was not related to changes in locomotor activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25532842 PMCID: PMC6271707 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191221442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure and key COSY and HMBC correlations observed for kaempferitrin.
Figure 2Effects kaempferitrin (Km), fluoxetine (FLX) desipramine (DMI), and imipramine (IMI) on the tail suspension test.
Figure 3Antidepressant-like effects Km, FLX, DMI, and IMI on the Forced Swimming Test.
Effects of Km, FLX, DMI, and IMI on open field test activity.
| Treatment (mg/kg) | Ambulatory Activity (Count Number/5 min) | Rearing Number/5 min |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 31.7 ± 3.24 | 17.6 ± 1.46 |
| Km1 | 35.0 ± 3.31 | 13.0 ± 3.40 |
| Km5 | 29.0 ± 3.48 | 20.5 ± 3.90 |
| Km10 | 32.1 ± 3.64 | 13.8 ±3.23 |
| Km20 | 44.7 ± 0.2.29 * | 17.7 ± 2.80 |
| H = 10.72, df = 4, | H = 3.18, df = 4, | |
| Control | 41. 12 ±1.32 | 25.25 ± 3.63 |
| FLX10 | 37.00 ± 2.17 | 21.75 ± 3.37 |
| FLX 15 | 45.37 ± 3.13 | 28.12 ± 0.81 |
| H = 5.39, df = 2, | H = 3.56, df = 2, | |
| Control DMI 3.12 DMI 6.25 | 37.7 ± 3.24 35.50 ± 5.58 40.5 ± 6.33 | 29.3 ± 5.73 26.53 ± 3.82 26.8 ± 4.20 |
| DMI 12.5 | 47.8 ± 3.92 | 28.0 ± 3.53 |
| DMI25 | 40.1 ± 4.76 | 18.7 ± 5.26 |
| H = 6.08, df = 4, | H = 4.97, df = 4, | |
| Control | 38.8 ± 1.29 | 25.2 ± 3.63 |
| IMI 6.25 | 44.5 ± 6.04 | 36.5 ± 4.67 |
| 12.5 | 30.2 ± 4.43 | 27.5 ± 2.77 |
| 25 | 41.12 ± 6.18 | 34.5 ±7.72 |
| H = 3.508, df = 3, | H = 7.38, df = 3, |
Effects of treatment with single doses oral route of kaempferitrin (Km) at a 1, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg and fluoxetine (FLX; 10 and 15 mg/kg; i.p.), desimipramine (DMI; 3.12, 6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg, i.p.), and imipramine (IMI 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/kg) in the Forced Swimming Test (FST) in mice. All results are expressed as the average ± SEM of 8 to 12 animals. Comparisons were made using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance based on rank, followed by the Mann-Whitney-U-test: * p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of the combination of Km and IMI, DMI, and FLX on the FST.
Effect of PCPA, pindolol, WAY100635 and 8OH-DPAT on the immobility time of Km in FST of mice.
| Treatment 1 (mg/kg) |
| Treatment 2 (mg/kg) | Immobility Time (sec) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Vehicle | vehicle | 57.93 ± 2.02 | |
| Pcpa (100) |
| 50.36 ± 4.52 | |
| Pcpa (100) | Km(10) | 51.26 ± 6.24 | |
|
| |||
| Vehicle | vehicle | 57.93 ± 2.02 | |
| Pindolol (10) | Vehicle | 59.86 ± 7.83 ### | |
| Vehicle | Km (10) | ||
| Km (10) | Pindolol (10) | ||
|
| |||
| Vehicle | vehicle | 52.93 ± 2.02 | |
| Way100635 (0.03) | vehicle | 58.03 ± 5.49 | |
| Vehicle | Km (10) | ||
| Way(0.03) | Km(10) | 54.24 ± 6.85 | |
|
| |||
| Vehicle | vehicle | 58.13 ± 2.31 | |
| Vehicle | Km (1) | 60.07 ± 3.82 | |
| vehicle | 60.85 ± 3.85 ### | ||
| vehicle | 30.78 ± 3.48 *** | ||
| Km (1) | 34.91 ± 3.48 ***, ### | ||
Effects of joint administration of Km and PCPA (100 mg/kg daily, during the 4 days previous to the test; i.p. route), Km (oral route) plus pindolol (i.p.; 10 mg/kg) 30 min before the FST, WAY 100635 at 0.03 mg/kg (s.c.via), 30 min before Km (10 mg/kg) administration and 60 min before the FST. of Km and 8OH-DPAT, were joint administered 30 min before the start of the FST; All results are expressed as the means ± standard error (n = 8–14). Comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance based on rank, followed by the Mann-Whitney-U-test: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 when compared with control group and ### p < 0.001 when compared with drug alone: PCPA (100) vs. [PCPA (100) plus Km (10)]: T = 80.0, n = 8–11, p = 0.967; Pindolol (10) vs. [Pindolol (10) plus Km (10)]: T = 124.0, n = 8, and n = 11, p ≤ 0.001; WAY100635 vs. [WAY100635 plus Km (10)]: T = 69.0, n = 8, p = 0.958; 8OH-DPAT (0.05) vs. [8OH-DPAT (0.05) plus Km (1)]: T = 98.0, n = 8–12, p ≤ 0.001.
Corticosterone serum levels of mice treated with vehicle, Km (10 and 20 mg/kg), and IMI.
| Treatment (mg/kg) | Corticosterone Levels (nmol/L) |
|---|---|
| Naïve | 495.42 ± 58.98 |
| Saline solution | 891.42 ± 141.13 *** |
| Km 10 | 1000.52 ± 38.42 *** |
| Km 20 | 1271.51 ± 200.91 *** |
| IMI 25 | 925.25 ± 128.59*** |
| F(4,24) = 4.96, |
Effect of the exposure to the pre-test session of the FST in naive (no treatment), vehicle-treated mice, Km (10 and 20 mg/kg; oral route) and IMI (25 mg/kg; i.p. via) treated mice on serum corticosterone levels 24 h after the pre-test. All results are expressed as the average ± S.E.M., of independent groups of eight animals Treatments vs. naive group: *** p ≤ 0.05.