| Literature DB >> 25532834 |
Pushkar Kanhere1, Zhong Chen2.
Abstract
Perovskite-based photocatalysts are of significant interest in the field of photocatalysis. To date, several perovskite material systems have been developed and their applications in visible light photocatalysis studied. This article provides a review of the visible light (λ > 400 nm) active perovskite-based photocatalyst systems. The materials systems are classified by the B site cations and their crystal structure, optical properties, electronic structure, and photocatalytic performance are reviewed in detail. Titanates, tantalates, niobates, vanadates, and ferrites form important photocatalysts which show promise in visible light-driven photoreactions. Along with simple perovskite (ABO3) structures, development of double/complex perovskites that are active under visible light is also reviewed. Various strategies employed for enhancing the photocatalytic performance have been discussed, emphasizing the specific advantages and challenges offered by perovskite-based photocatalysts. This review provides a broad overview of the perovskite photocatalysts, summarizing the current state of the work and offering useful insights for their future development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25532834 PMCID: PMC6271878 DOI: 10.3390/molecules191219995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Crystal structure of simple Perovskite, (a) BaTiO3 and (b) double perovskite Na2Ta2O6 (red: oxygen, green and purple: A site cation, grey and blue: BO6 octahedra).
Figure 2Energy levels of some of the important photocatalytic reactions with respect to NHE at pH = 0 [28].
Figure 3Band diagram and schematics of water splitting reaction over a photocatalyst surface [30].
Figure 4Band diagram and schematics of degradation of organic compounds over a photocatalyst surface [12,33].
Figure 5Schematics of CO2 photoreduction reaction over a photocatalyst surface [34].
Figure 6Overview of elements forming perovskite titanates useful for visible light photocatalysis.
Figure 7(a) Schematic microstructure and (b) band diagram of Z scheme photocatalysis using Rh-doped SrTiO3 [45].
Figure 8Band edge potentials (vs. NHE; pH = 0) of MTiO3 system [56].
Compilation of promising photocatalytic systems for hydrogen or oxygen evolution under visible light.
| Material System | Irradiation (nm) | Photocatalytic Performance | Experimental Details | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% Rh doped SrTiO3 (0.5% Pt) | 420–800 | H2 at 48.1 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 20% methanol, 50 mg in 50 mL of solution | [ |
| Rh: SrTiO3: BiVO4 | >420 | Z scheme Water splitting. H2 at 128, O2 at 61 µmol·h−1 | 4.2% Efficiency, 50 mg 120 mL (FeCl3 shuttle) | [ |
| Cr-Sb co-doped SrTiO3, (0.3% Pt) | >420 | H2 at 78, O2 at 0.9 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agents | in aqueous methanol and AgNO3 solution | [ |
| MCo1/3Nb2/3O3 (0.2% Pt) | >420 | H2 at 1.4 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 500 mg catalyst in 50 mL methanol, 220 mL water, | [ |
| Sr1-xNbO3(1% Pt) | >420 | H2 at 44.8 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 0.025M oxalic acid, 0.1g catalyst in 200 mL, | [ |
| AgNbO3-SrTiO3 | >420 | O2 at 162 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 0.5 g catalyst in 275 mL AgNO3 solution, | [ |
| LaFeO3 (Pt co-catalyst) | 400–700 | H2 at 3315 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | H2 = 3315, µmol·h−1,1 mg in 20 mL of ethanol | [ |
| CaTi1_xCuxO3 (x = 0.02), NiOx co-catalyst | >400 | H2 at 22.7 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 100 mg catalyst in 420 mL methanol solution | [ |
| PrFeO3, (Pt co-catalyst) | 200W Tungsten source | H2 at 2847 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 1 mg in 20 mL ethanol solution | [ |
| Bi doped NaTaO3 | >400 | H2 at 59.48 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 100 mg catalyst in 210 mL of methanol solution | [ |
| GdCrO3—Gd2Ti2O7 composite | >420 | H2 at 246.3 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 4.1% apparent quantum efficiency, methanol solution | [ |
| CoTiO3 | >420 | O2 at 64.6 µmol·h−1 with sacrificial agent | 100 mg in 100 mL 0.04M AgNO3 and La2O3 solution, 420 nm | [ |
Figure 9Estimated band gaps and band edge potentials of doped and co-doped NaTaO3 systems: DFT study to design novel photocatalyst [85]
Figure 10Schematics of changes to band diagram upon polarization of Gd doped BiFeO3 due to ferroelectricity [106].
Compilation of promising photocatalytic systems for organic compounds degradation under visible light.
| Materials System | Band Gap (eV) | Photocatalytic Tests Reported | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ga doped BiFeO3 | 2.18–2.50 | Enhanced degradation of rhodamine B compared to pristine BiFeO3 | [ |
| LaFeO3 | 2.10 | Nanospheres show higher rates of rhodamine B degradation than nanocubes and nanorods | [ |
| YFeO3 | 2.43 | Rhodamine B degradation rate higher than P25 (>400 nm) | [ |
| NaBiO3 | 2.60 | Bleaching rate of Methylene Blue higher than N doped TiO2. (>400 nm) | [ |
| AgSbO3 | 2.58 | Eddicient degradation of Rh B. MB, 4-chlorophenol (>420 nm) | [ |
| AgBiO3 | 2.50 | Inhibition of
| [ |