| Literature DB >> 25531759 |
Daniella Bezerra Duarte1, Lucas Alexandre Vanderlei2, Raianne Kívia de Azevêdo Bispo2, Maria Eliete Pinheiro2, Geraldo Bezerra da Silva3, Alice Maria Costa Martins4, Gdayllon Cavalcante Meneses4, Elizabeth De Francesco Daher5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal involvement in Schistosoma mansoni infection is not well studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the occurrence of renal abnormalities in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS), especially renal tubular disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25531759 PMCID: PMC4274079 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population.
| Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis ( | Controls ( |
| |
| Age, years (Mean ± SD) | 42.2±9.2 | 34.8±15.2 | 0.09 |
| Male, % | 50 | 53 | 1.0 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 114±18 | 122±9 | 0.21 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 73±10 | 79±5 | 0.07 |
| Time of disease, years | 15.5±11.5 | --- | --- |
| Splenomegaly, % | 100 | --- | --- |
| Prior splenectomy, % | 70 | --- | --- |
| Periportal fibrosis, % | 95 | --- | --- |
| Esophageal varices, % | 95 | --- | --- |
| Previous upper gastrointestinal bleeding, % | 55 | --- | --- |
| Intestinal disorders, % | 30 | --- | --- |
| Hepatomegaly, % | 20 | --- | --- |
| Positive stool examination for | 75 | --- | --- |
| Positive liver biopsy, % | 25 | --- | --- |
Data are shown as mean ± SD or percentages. Significant P <0.05 vs. control by Student' t and Fisher's exact tests.
General laboratory parameters of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis patients and controls.
| Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis ( | Controls ( |
| |
| Hemoglobin, | 13.9±1.4 | 14.1±1.3 | 0.80 |
| Hematocrit, | 42.4±4.2 | 42.4±4.5 | 1.0 |
| Leukocytes,/ | 6,098±2,760 | 6,446±479 | 0.60 |
| Platelets,/ | 195,520±107,290 | 270,660±34,092 | 0.01 |
| PNa,
| 139±3.0 | 138±3.9 | 0.15 |
| PK, | 4.4±0.4 | 4.3± 0.4 | 0.41 |
| PCa, | 9.7±0.6 | 9.2±0.3 | 0.05 |
| PP, | 3.2±0.5 | 3.6±0.6 | 0.15 |
| PCl, | 103±3.2 | 107±7.6 | 0.43 |
| PMg, | 1.9±0.2 | 1.9±0.2 | 0.52 |
| C3, | 88±28 | --- | --- |
| C4, | 19±9 | --- | --- |
| AST, | 41±13 | --- | --- |
| ALT, | 37±12 | --- | --- |
| Alkaline phosphatase, | 120±86 | --- | --- |
| GGT, | 104±82 | --- | --- |
| Total bilirubin, | 0.94±0.46 | --- | --- |
| Direct bilirubin, | 0.23±0.25 | --- | --- |
| Indirect bilirubin, | 0.71±0.25 | --- | --- |
| Total protein, | 8.1±0.4 | --- | --- |
| Albumin, | 4.3±0.4 | --- | --- |
| Globulin, | 3.8±0.55 | --- | --- |
| INR | 1.28±0.18 | --- | --- |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant P<0.05 vs control by Student t test. PNa+, plasma sodium; PK+, plasma potassium; PCa2+, plasma calcium; PP, plasma phosphorus; PCl-, plasma chloride; PMg2+, plasma magnesium AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase; INR, international normalized ratio.
Comparison of urinary concentration and acidification tests in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis patients and controls.
| Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis ( | Controls ( |
| |
|
| 588±112 | 764±165 | 0.001 |
|
| 2.0±0.4 | 2.6±0.5 | <0.001 |
| Arterial pH T0 | 7.36±0.04 | 7.37±0.04 | 0.39 |
| Arterial pH T4 | 7.34±0.03 | 7.35±0.03 | 0.18 |
| HCO3- T0, mEq/L | 24±1.3 | 27± 3.8 | 0.005 |
| HCO3- T4, mEq/L | 23±1.6 | 24±2.9 | 0.03 |
|
| 6.2±0.6 | 5.6±0.4 | 0.002 |
|
| 5.4±0.6 | 5.0±0.3 | 0.02 |
| Urinary concentration deficit | 17 (85%) | 5 (29.4%) | 0.001 |
| Urinary acidification deficit | 9 (45%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0.03 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant P <0.05 vs control by Student t test. U osm, urinary osmolality after DDAVP; U/Posm, urinary to plasma osmolality ratio; HCO3-, serum bicarbonate; UpH, urinary pH.
Comparison of renal function in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis patients and controls.
| Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis ( | Controls ( |
| |
| PUr, mg/dL | 23±7.7 | 26±8.0 | 0.38 |
| PCr, mg/dL | 0.6±0.1 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.0001 |
| GFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 130±38 | 103±16 | 0.01 |
| Microalbuminuria, mg/day | 35.8±83.6 | 5.5±5.3 | 0.12 |
| Proteinuria, mg/day | 139±148 | 95±61 | 0.26 |
| Urinary MCP-1, pg/mg-Cr | 122±134 | 40±28 | 0.01 |
| FENa+, % | 0.69±0.3 | 0.62±0.1 | 0.40 |
| FEMg++, % | 2.96±1.8 | 1.81±1.0 | 0.14 |
| FEK+, % | 0.55±0.2 | 0.52±0.2 | 0.82 |
| TTKG | 3.3±1.7 | 3.0±1.2 | 0.62 |
| TcH2O, L/day | 0.72±0.5 | 1.1±0.3 | 0.04 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant P <0.05 vs. control by Student t test. PCr, plasma creatinine; PUr, plasma urea; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; MCP-1, Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 FENa+, fractional excretion of sodium; FEMg++, fractional excretion of magnesium; FEK+, fractional excretion of potassium; TTKG, transtubular potassium transport; TcH2O, reabsorption of free water solute.
Figure 1Correlation between urinary MCP-1 and albuminuria in schistosomiasis patients.
Figure 2Correlation between urinary MCP-1 and proteinuria in schistosomiasis patients.