| Literature DB >> 22715954 |
Rodrigo A Oliveira1, Cláudio G Lima, Rosa Ms Mota, Alice Mc Martins, Talita R Sanches, Antônio C Seguro, Lúcia C Andrade, Geraldo B Silva Junior, Alexandre B Libório, Elizabeth F Daher.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal evaluation studies are rare in American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL). The aim of this study is to investigate whether specific treatment reverts ACL-associated renal dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22715954 PMCID: PMC3444398 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Clinical and demographic data of patients with ACL compared with healthy subjects
| 35.6 ± 12 | 32.3 ± 11.7 | 0.442 | |
| Male | 19 (51.4%) | 6 (60%) | 0.73 |
| Female | 18 (48.6%) | 4 (40%) | |
| 28.5 ± 20.6 | - | - | |
| 22/37 | - | - | |
| 1 | 27 (72.9%) | - | - |
| 2 to 4 | 7 (18.9%) | - | - |
| >4 | 3 (8.1%) | ||
| 122 ±10 | 117 ± 9.5 | 0.221 | |
| 80 ± 4.7 | 75 ± 8.5 | 0.079 | |
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation or %. Student t test.
Laboratory data of 37 patients with ACL before and after specific treatment
| 42.6 ± 4.1 | 40.5 ± 4.2 | 0.0052 | |
| 13.9 ± 1.2 | 13.3 ± 1.5 | 0.019 | |
| 6.359 ± 1918 | 6.035 ± 1513 | 0.269 | |
| 275.351 ± 66.259 | 292.702 ± 60.570 | 0.074 | |
| 7.35 ± 0.1 | 7.35 ± 0.1 | 0.634 | |
| 80 ± 15 | 80 ± 17 | 0.915 | |
| 143 ± 48 | 148 ± 62 | 0.666 | |
| 0.5 ± 0.27 | 0.6 ± 0.23 | 0.810 | |
| 93 ± 33 | 107 ± 52 | 0.08 | |
| 4 ± 0.6 | 4 ± 0.6 | 0.696 | |
| 3.3 ± 0.86 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 0.135 | |
| 34 ± 15 | 46 ± 36 | 0.034 | |
| 28 ± 19 | 42 ± 33 | 0.023 | |
| 30 ± 21 | 26 ± 18 | 0.198 |
Significant P < 0.05. AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation or %. T test and Wilcoxon test.
Glomerular and tubular function of 37 patients with ACL before and after specific treatment
| 0.81 ± 0.16 | 0.81 ± 0.15 | 0.85 ± 0.18 | |
| 109.6 ± 31.5 | 108.4 ± 28.5 | 116.4 ± 22.7 | |
| 2.19 ± 0.73 | 1.95 ± 0.73 | 3.47 ± 0.33 | |
| 5.45 ± 0.64 | 5.19 ± 0.60* | 4.82 ± 0.20 # | |
| 618 ± 202 | 552 ± 210 | 965 ± 81 # | |
| 1.15 ± 0.74 | 1.35 ± 1.51** | 0.73 ± 0.39 | |
| 10 ± 6.6 | 10.1 ± 7.6 | 7.50 ± 2.8# | |
| 1.07 ± 0.72 | 1.32 ± 1.01 | 0.62 ± 0.34# | |
| 10.9 ± 9.98 | 10.9 ± 15.7 | 9.10 ± 6.4 | |
| 1.81 ± 1.70 | 1.90 ± 1.44 | 0.90 ± 0.40# | |
| 23.6 ± 26*** | 14.6 ± 18.9 | 6.12 ± 4.06 |
* Pre vs. Post-glucantime, p = 0.0066; # control vs. Pre and post-glucantime, p < 0.05; **Post-glucantime vs. control, p = 0.048; ***pre vs. post-glucantime, p = 0.025. DATA: MEAN ± SD. Student t test, Mann–Whitney.
Pcrea – SerumCreatinine.
CrCl – Creatinine clearance.
U/Posm – Urinary and serum osmolarity ratio.
UpH em T4 – Urinary pH in T4.
Uosm T4 – Urinary osmolality in T4.
FE: fraction excretion.
Prevalence of renal dysfunction in 37 patients with ACL before and after specific treatment
| - | - | - | |
| 11 (30%) | 12 (32%) | 1.000 | |
| 12 (39%) | 3 (10%) | 0.004 | |
| 21 (62%) | 24 (71%) | 0.508 | |
| 26 (77%) | 30 (88%) | 0.344 | |
| 15 (40%) | 6 (16%) | 0.012 | |
| 5 (14%) | 4 (11%) | 1.000 | |
| 12 (32%) | 11(30%) | 1.000 | |
| 2 (5%) | 2 ( 5%) | 1.000 | |
| 17 (46%) | 10 (27%) | 0.143 | |
| 1 (2.7%) | 1 (2.7%) | 1.000 |
Pcrea – plasma creatinine; CrCl – creatinine clearance; U/Posm – urine and plasma osmolarity ratio; UpH T4 – urine pH in T4 (4 hours after CaCl2 administration); Uosm T4 – urine osmolariry in T4 (4 hours after DDAVP administration); EFNa – Sodium excretion fraction; EFK – Potassium excretion fraction; EFCa – Calcium excretion fraction; EFMg – Magnesium excretion fraction. Data expressed as percentage (%).