| Literature DB >> 25530615 |
Dan Wu1, Lin Huang2, Max S Jiang3, Huabei Jiang4.
Abstract
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) and thermoacoustic imaging (TAI) are two emerging biomedical imaging techniques that both utilize ultrasonic signals as an information carrier. Unique advantages of PAI and TAI are their abilities to provide high resolution functional information such as hemoglobin and blood oxygenation and tissue dielectric properties relevant to physiology and pathology. These two methods, however, may have a limited detection depth and lack of endogenous contrast. An exogenous contrast agent is often needed to effectively resolve these problems. Such agents are able to greatly enhance the imaging contrast and potentially break through the imaging depth limit. Furthermore, a receptor-targeted contrast agent could trace the molecular and cellular biological processes in tissues. Thus, photoacoustic and thermoacoustic molecular imaging can be outstanding tools for early diagnosis, precise lesion localization, and molecular typing of various diseases. The agents also could be used for therapy in conjugation with drugs or in photothermal therapy, where it functions as an enhancer for the integration of diagnosis and therapy. In this article, we present a detailed review about various exogenous contrast agents for photoacoustic and thermoacoustic molecular imaging. In addition, challenges and future directions of photoacoustic and thermoacoustic molecular imaging in the field of translational medicine are also discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25530615 PMCID: PMC4284784 DOI: 10.3390/ijms151223616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Contrast agents for photoacoustic imaging.
| Photoacoustic Contrast Agent | Type | Absorption Peak (nm) | Size (nm) | Modification Application | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indocyanine-green | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 810 | <2 | CarbonNanotube, PEG, PEBBLEs | PAT, in tissue phantoms and | [ |
| Methylene blue | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 650–700 | <2 | PAT, in tissue phantoms | [ | |
| Alexa Fluor 750 | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 750 | <2 | Multispectral PAI, | [ | |
| IRDye800CW | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 750–800 | <2 | NPR-1 | PAS, | [ |
| IRDye800-c(KRGDf) | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 750–790 | <2 | Integral proteinαvβ3 | PAS, | [ |
| Evans Blue | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 550 | <2 | PAT, | [ | |
| PPCy-C8 | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 754–789 | <2 | Perfluorocarbon | [ | |
| Cypate-C18 | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 754–790 | <2 | Perfluorocarbon | [ | |
| Caspase-9 Probe | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 640 | <2 | PAI, | [ | |
| MMPSence™ 680 | NIR Fluorescent Dye | 620, 680 | <2 | PAI, in tissue phantoms | [ | |
| BHQ3 | Quencher | 672 | <2 | PAI, | [ | |
| QXL680 | Quencher | 680 | <2 | PAI, | [ | |
| Au Nanospheres | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 520–550 | 20–80 | PEG | PAT, | [ |
| Au Nanoshells | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 700–1100 | 50–500 | PEG | PAT, | [ |
| Au Nanorods | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 550–1550 | a few to hundreds of | HER2, EGFR | PAI, | [ |
| Au Nanocages | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle/Theranostic Contrast Agent | 820 | 25 | PAT, | [ | |
| Au Nanoclusters | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 500–550 | 100 | PAI, | [ | |
| Au Nanostars | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 767 | 120 | PAT, | [ | |
| Au Nanobeacons | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 520 | 150 | αvβ3 | PAT, | [ |
| Ag Nanoplates | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle | 550–1080 | 25–218 | a-EGFR, PEG | PAI, | [ |
| Ag Nanosystems | Plasmonic Noble Metal Nanoparticle/Theranostic Contrast Agent | 400–500 | 180–520 | PAI, | [ | |
| Quantum dots | Nanoparticles Based On Other Principles | 400–750 | <10 | PAT, | [ | |
| Nanodiamond | Nanoparticles Based On Other Principles | 820 | 68.7 | PAI, | [ | |
| Polypyrrole Nanoparticles | Nanoparticles Based On Other Principles | 700–900 | 46 | PAI, | [ | |
| Copper Sulfide | Nanoparticles Based On Other Principles | 900 | 11 ± 3 | PAI, | [ | |
| Graphene Nanosheets | Nanoparticles Based On Other Principles | 200–900 | 10 | PAI, | [ | |
| Iron Oxide-gold Core-shell | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 660–900 | 1–5 | Triple-modality MRI-PAI-mmPA | [ | |
| Gd2O3 | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 100 | DEG, gelatin | [ | ||
| Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNT) | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 785 | 5–8 | Protamine, PEG | [ | |
| Dye-loaded Perfluorocarbon-based Nanoparticles | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 750–800 | 220 ± 11 | cypate-C18, PPCy-C8,PEG2000, phosphatidylethanolamine | [ | |
| AuMBs | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 760 | 100–1000 | HAS | Dual-modality PAI-UI | [ |
| Triggered Nanodroplets | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 750–800 | 300 | Perfluorocarbon | In tissue phantoms and | [ |
| Cobalt Nanowontons | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 700 | 30–90 | Dual-modality MRI-PAT | [ | |
| Nanoroses | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 700–850 | 30 | PAI, | [ | |
| MPRs | Theranostic/Multimodality Contrast Agent | 532 | 120 | maleimide-DOTA-Gd | [ | |
| Goldsilica Core shell Nanorods | Theranostic Contrast Agent | 780 | 10.3 ± 1.1 | PEG | PAI, | [ |
| Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) | Theranostic Contrast Agent | 500–780 | 80–150 | PAI, | [ |
Figure 1PAT images of tumor at 5 min (a) and 5 h (b) following tail vein injection of gold nanoparticles; (c) and (d) are the subtraction PAT images of tumor following tail vein injection of gold nanoparticles demonstrating increased accumulation of nanoparticles in tumor at 5 h. The color scale (right) represents optical absorption of tissue (arbitrary units); (e) is gross picture of tumor in mouse and (f) is the fusion image of gross photo and subtraction PAT image, 5 h following tail vein injection. (Reprinted from reference [22]. Copyright with permissionfrom © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd.).
Figure 2In vivo noninvasive photoacoustic imaging of sentinel lymph nodes in rat (λ = 767 nm). (a–g) Scale bar is 5 mm. Aliquots of 150 mL of nanobeacons were injected intradermally in all cases. GNB-M: (a) control PA image; (b) 5 min post-injection image of GNB-M (5 mM); GNB-L: (c) control PA image; (d) lymph node is not visible in a 60 min post-injection image of GNB-L (680 nM); GNB-S: (e) sagittal maximum amplitude projection (MAP) pre-injection control image; bright parts represent optical absorption from blood vessels, marked with red arrows; (f) PA image (MAP) acquired 5 min after GNB-S injection (10 nM); SLNs are clearly visible, marked with green arrows; lymphatic vessel is also visible, marked with blue arrows; (g) 20 min post-injection PA image. (Reprinted from reference [37]. Copyright with permission from © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.).
Figure 3Multifunctional nanosystem platform capable of providing imaging contrast, drug delivery, and image-guided therapy. (Reprinted from reference [39]. Copyright with permission from © 2010 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers).
Figure 4Photoacoustic (PA) signal of GO and ME-LOGr nanosheets of different concentrations, illuminated with 700 (a) and 800 (b) nm laser. The color coded vertical bar represents the strength of the photoacoustic signal generated. GO nanosheets were obtained via control-A experiment where nitronium ions and KMnO4 both act as an oxidant. (Reprinted from reference [44]. Copyright with permission from © 2013 American Chemical Society).
Figure 5PAT-MRI images of tumor (a) before and (b) after injection of Gd2O3-DEG-gelatin. (Reprinted from reference [46]. Copyright with permission from © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).
Figure 6Triple-modality detection of brain tumors in living mice with MPRs. (a) Two-dimensional axial MRI, photoacoustic and Raman images. The post-injection images of all three modalities showed clear tumor visualization (dashed boxes outline the imaged area); (b) A three dimensional (3D) rendering of magnetic resonance images with the tumor segmented (red; top), an overlay of the three-dimensional photoacoustic images (green) over the MRI (middle) and an overlay of MRI, the segmented tumor and the photoacoustic images (bottom) showing good colocalization of the photoacoustic signal with the tumor. (Reprinted from reference [52]. Copyright with permission from © 2012, Rights Managed by Nature Publishing Group).
Figure 7Intra-operative Photoacoustic imaging. A mouse bearing a glioblastoma tumor (primary human xenograft) was injected with MPRs (150 µL, 16 nM). After 24 h, the brain was perfused with PBS, excised, and embedded in an agarose gel. Coronal photoacoustic images were acquired before (left image) and after (right image) partial tumor resection. An absence of photoacoustic signal in the resected portion of the tumor was observed, while residual photoacoustic signal (arrow-head) was observed in the area of the non-resected tumor. Note that the increased grayscale ultrasound signal to the right of the resected cavity is likely due the surgical manipulation, an effect that is commonly observed during surgery. Photoacoustic images (color scale from 0 to max) were overlaid on conventional ultrasound images (gray), which outline the gross anatomy of the mouse brain. (Reprinted from reference [52]. Copyright with permission from © 2012, Rights Managed by Nature Publishing Group).
Contrast agents for thermoacoustic imaging.
| Thermoacoustic Contrast Agent | Type | Excitation Source Frequency (GHz) | Size(nm) | Modification Application | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbonyl Iron | Magnetic nanoparticles | 1.2 | 2000 | TAI, in tissue phantoms | [ | |
| Dextran-coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles | Magnetic nanoparticles | 6 | 30–50 | Dextran | TAI, in tissue phantoms | [ |
| NMG2[Gd(DTPA)] | Paramagnetic ionic compound | 6 | TAI, | [ | ||
| Fe3O4/Polyaniline (PANI) | Superparamagnetic nanoparticles | 6 | 30–50 | Folic Acid (FA) | [ | |
| Fe3O4 /Au Nanoparticles | Fe3O4 core/Au shell Nanoparticles | 6 | 30–50 | FITC-labeled integrinαvβ3mAb | Triple-modality MRI-TAI-PAI | [ |
| Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes(SWNT) | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 3 | Diameter: 1.2–2.2; length: 500–1000 | [ | ||
| Microbubbles | Multimodality Contrast Agent | 3 | 18,000 | UI, and | [ |
Figure 8Thermoacoustic CT of tumor bearing mouse before injection of NMG2[Gd(DTPA)] (a) and after in situ injection of NMG2[Gd(DTPA)] (b). (Reprinted from reference [4]. Copyright with permission from © 2012 American Institute of Physics).
Figure 9In vivo thermoacoustic imaging of tumors with contrast agent bearing in mouse. (a,d) TAT images of control sample injected with PBS; (b,e) TAT images of tumor injected with Fe3O4/PANI and Fe3O4/PANI-FA, respectively; (c,f) Photographs of tumor’s area on the mouse back. (Reprinted from reference [65]. Copyright with permission from © 2010 Am. Assoc. Phys. Med.).