| Literature DB >> 25528753 |
Jonathan T Johnson1, Joshua K Adkins1, Lynne K Rieske2.
Abstract
In the eastern United States, eastern hemlock Tusga canadensis (L.) Carriere forests are threatened by the invasive hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae, a pest that is causing widespread hemlock mortality. Eastern hemlock is an essential component of forested communities. Adelgid-induced hemlock mortality is causing a shift in forest composition and structure, altering ecosystem function and thereby influencing the arthropod community. Using pitfall traps at three sites, we monitored ground-dwelling arthropods at 30-d intervals in hemlock-dominated and deciduous-dominated forests in central Appalachia over 2 yr. Here, we focus on the ant community (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) collected in the summer months. Ants form a ubiquitous and integral component of the invertebrate community, functioning at various trophic levels as predators, herbivores, and omnivores, and fulfilling important roles in forest ecosystems. We found no difference in overall ant abundance between hemlock-dominated and deciduous-dominated forests but did detect significant differences in the genera Prenolepis between forest types (P < 0.01) and Aphaenogaster across study locations (P = 0.02). Three genera were unique to deciduous forests; one was unique to hemlock forests. Not surprisingly, total formicids and several genera demonstrated temporal differences in abundance, with greater numbers captured in July than in August. As hemlock woolly adelgid-induced mortality of eastern hemlock becomes more pervasive, changes in forest composition and structure are imminent, accompanied by shifts in hemlock associates.Entities:
Keywords: Arthropod; Tsuga canadensis; diversity; hemlock; hemlock woolly adelgid
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25528753 PMCID: PMC5634051 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Formicidae abundance in pitfall traps ( N = 54) monitored in eastern hemlock and deciduous dominated riparian zones of central Appalachia over two summers
| Subfamily | Genus |
Overstory vegetation
| Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemlock | Deciduous | |||
| Formicinae |
| 157 | 37 | 194 |
|
| 0 | 63 | 63 | |
|
| 27 | 2 | 29 | |
|
| 17 | 12 | 29 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Subtotal | 203 | 116 | 319 | |
| Myrmecinae |
| 270 | 233 | 503 |
|
| 14 | 4 | 18 | |
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 285 | 237 | 522 | |
| Ponerinae |
| 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Subtotal | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Dolichoderinae |
| 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Subtotal | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Total Formicidae | 488 | 357 | 845 | |
Abundance and diversity (mean [SE] per trap, N = 54) of ant genera sampled in pitfall traps from the forest floor of eastern hemlock and deciduous dominated forests over summer months in eastern Kentucky
|
Overstory vegetation
|
Month
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemlock | Deciduous | July | August | |
|
| 2.5 (0.6)a | 2.2 (0.5)a | 3.4 (0.7)a | 1.3 (0.4)b |
|
| 1.5 (0.8)a | 0.3 (0.1)a | 1.7 (0.8)a | 0.1 (0.0)b |
|
| 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.6 (0.3)b | 0.5 (0.2)a | 0.1 (0.1)a |
|
| 0.2 (0.1)a | 0.1 (0.1)a | 0.3 (0.1)a | 0.0 (0.0)b |
|
| 0.3 (0.3)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.3 (0.3)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
|
| 0.1 (0.1)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.2 (0.1)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
|
| 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
|
| 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
|
| 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
|
| 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a | 0.0 (0.0)a |
| Total Formicidae | 4.5 (1.3)a | 3.3 (0.7)a | 6.4 (1.4)a | 1.5 (0.4)b |
| Shannon Index | 0.4 (0.1)a | 0.6 (0.1)a | 0.6 (0.1)a | 0.4 (0.1)a |
| Simpson Index | 0.2 (0.0)a | 0.4 (0.0)a | 0.6 (0.0)a | 0.5 (0.1)a |
| Evenness | 0.5 (0.1)a | 0.6 (0.1)a | 0.4 (0.0)a | 0.3 (0.1)a |
| Generic richness | 0.4 (0.1)a | 0.5 (0.1)a | 0.7 (0.1)a | 0.2 (0.1)b |
Means within rows followed by the same letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).
Fig. 1.Occurrence of numerically dominant ants from July and August pitfall trap collections (N = 54) from hemlock dominated versus deciduous dominated riparian areas of central Appalachia. The abundance of a) Aphaenogaster spp. and b) Camponotus spp. did not differ among study locations or dominant riparian canopy vegetation.
Fig. 2.Occurrence of Prenolepis imparis in hemlock dominated versus deciduous dominated riparian areas of central Appalachia. N = 54, F 1,48 = 7.41, P < 0.01, different letters indicate significant differences.
Fig. 3.Abundance of Aphaenogaster ants in riparian areas of three study sites in southeastern Kentucky. KYR: Kentucky Ridge State Forest; RF: Robinson Forest; RRG: Red River Gorge. N = 54; F 2,48 = 5.81, P < 0.01, different letters indicate significant differences.