Literature DB >> 22642689

Why are there more arboreal ant species in primary than in secondary tropical forests?

Petr Klimes1, Cliffson Idigel, Maling Rimandai, Tom M Fayle, Milan Janda, George D Weiblen, Vojtech Novotny.   

Abstract

1. Species diversity of arboreal arthropods tends to increase during rainforest succession so that primary forest communities comprise more species than those from secondary vegetation, but it is not well understood why. Primary forests differ from secondary forests in a wide array of factors whose relative impacts on arthropod diversity have not yet been quantified. 2. We assessed the effects of succession-related determinants on a keystone ecological group, arboreal ants, by conducting a complete census of 1332 ant nests from all trees with diameter at breast height ≥ 5 cm occurring within two (unreplicated) 0·32-ha plots, one in primary and one in secondary lowland forest in New Guinea. Specifically, we used a novel rarefaction-based approach to match number, size distribution and taxonomic structure of trees in primary forest communities to those in secondary forest and compared the resulting numbers of ant species. 3. In total, we recorded 80 nesting ant species from 389 trees in primary forest but only 42 species from 295 trees in secondary forest. The two habitats did not differ in the mean number of ant species per tree or in the relationship between ant diversity and tree size. However, the between-tree similarity of ant communities was higher in secondary forest than in primary forest, as was the between-tree nest site similarity, suggesting that secondary trees were more uniform in providing nesting microhabitats. 4. Using our rarefaction method, the difference in ant species richness between two forest types was partitioned according to the effects of higher tree density (22·6%), larger tree size (15·5%) and higher taxonomic diversity of trees (14·3%) in primary than in secondary forest. The remaining difference (47·6%) was because of higher beta diversity of ant communities between primary forest trees. In contrast, difference in nest density was explained solely by difference in tree density. 5. Our study shows that reduction in plant taxonomic diversity in secondary forests is not the main driver of the reduction in canopy ant species richness. We suggest that the majority of arboreal species losses in secondary tropical forests are attributable to simpler vegetation structure, combined with lower turnover of nesting microhabitats between trees.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642689     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02002.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  15 in total

1.  Biogeochemistry and forest composition shape nesting patterns of a dominant canopy ant.

Authors:  Jelena Bujan; S Joseph Wright; Michael Kaspari
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ecosystem engineering in the arboreal realm: heterogeneity of wood-boring beetle cavities and their use by cavity-nesting ants.

Authors:  Galen V Priest; Flávio Camarota; Scott Powell; Heraldo L Vasconcelos; Robert J Marquis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Spatiotemporal Patterns of Ant Metacommunity in a Montane Forest Archipelago.

Authors:  Humberto Soares Caldeira Brant; Pedro Giovâni da Silva; Flávio Siqueira de Castro; Lucas Neves Perillo; Frederico de Siqueira Neves
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Ants of Ambon Island - diversity survey and checklist.

Authors:  Fransina Latumahina; Michaela Borovanska; Nugroho Susetya Putra; Milan Janda
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Disentangling the diversity of arboreal ant communities in tropical forest trees.

Authors:  Petr Klimes; Pavel Fibich; Cliffson Idigel; Maling Rimandai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Co-occurrence patterns in a diverse arboreal ant community are explained more by competition than habitat requirements.

Authors:  Flávio Camarota; Scott Powell; Adriano S Melo; Galen Priest; Robert J Marquis; Heraldo L Vasconcelos
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Effect of tropical forest disturbance on the competitive interactions within a diverse ant community.

Authors:  Ross E J Gray; Robert M Ewers; Michael J W Boyle; Arthur Y C Chung; Richard J Gill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Canopy vegetation influences ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities in headwater stream riparian zones of central Appalachia.

Authors:  Jonathan T Johnson; Joshua K Adkins; Lynne K Rieske
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Past Human Disturbance Effects upon Biodiversity are Greatest in the Canopy; A Case Study on Rainforest Butterflies.

Authors:  Andrew Whitworth; Jaime Villacampa; Alice Brown; Ruthmery Pillco Huarcaya; Roger Downie; Ross MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ants Response to Human-Induced Disturbance in a Rain Tropical Forest.

Authors:  B Walter; A Graclik; P Tryjanowski; O Wasielewski
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 1.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.