Amanda Fallin1, Torsten B Neilands2, Jeffrey W Jordan3, Juliette S Hong4, Pamela M Ling5. 1. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. 2. Center for AIDS Prevention Studies. 3. Rescue Social Change Group, San Diego, California. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco. 5. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco. Electronic address: pling@medicine.ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 25% of young adult Oklahomans smoked cigarettes in 2012. Tobacco marketing campaigns target young adults in social environments like bars/nightclubs. Social Branding interventions are designed to compete directly with this marketing. PURPOSE: To evaluate an intervention to reduce smoking among young adult "Partiers" in Oklahoma. The Partier peer crowd was described as follows: attendance at large nightclubs, fashion consciousness, valuing physical attractiveness, and achieving social status by exuding an image of confidence and financial success. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional study with three time points. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Randomized time location survey samples of young adult Partier bar and club patrons in Oklahoma City (Time 1 [2010], n=1,383; Time 2 [2011], n=1,292; and Time 3 [2012], n=1,198). Data were analyzed in 2013. INTERVENTION: The "HAVOC" Social Branding intervention was designed to associate a smoke-free lifestyle with Partiers' values, and included events at popular clubs, brand ambassador peer leaders who transmit the anti-tobacco message, social media, and tailored anti-tobacco messaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily and nondaily smoking rates, and binge drinking rates (secondary). RESULTS: Overall, smoking rates did not change (44.1% at Time 1, 45.0% at Time 2, and 47.4% at Time 3; p=0.17), but there was a significant interaction between intervention duration and brand recall. Partiers reporting intervention recall had lower odds of daily smoking (OR=0.30 [0.10, 0.95]) and no difference in nondaily smoking, whereas Partiers who did not recall the intervention had increased odds of smoking (daily AOR=1.74 [1.04, 2.89]; nondaily AOR=1.97 [1.35, 2.87]). Among non-Partiers, those who recalled HAVOC reported no difference in smoking, and those who did not recall HAVOC reported significantly increased odds of smoking (daily AOR=1.53 [1.02, 2.31]; nondaily AOR=1.72 [1.26, 2.36]). Binge drinking rates were significantly lower (AOR=0.73 [0.59, 0.89]) overall. CONCLUSIONS: HAVOC has the potential to affect smoking behavior among Oklahoma Partiers without increasing binge drinking.
BACKGROUND: More than 25% of young adult Oklahomans smoked cigarettes in 2012. Tobacco marketing campaigns target young adults in social environments like bars/nightclubs. Social Branding interventions are designed to compete directly with this marketing. PURPOSE: To evaluate an intervention to reduce smoking among young adult "Partiers" in Oklahoma. The Partier peer crowd was described as follows: attendance at large nightclubs, fashion consciousness, valuing physical attractiveness, and achieving social status by exuding an image of confidence and financial success. DESIGN: Repeated cross-sectional study with three time points. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Randomized time location survey samples of young adult Partier bar and club patrons in Oklahoma City (Time 1 [2010], n=1,383; Time 2 [2011], n=1,292; and Time 3 [2012], n=1,198). Data were analyzed in 2013. INTERVENTION: The "HAVOC" Social Branding intervention was designed to associate a smoke-free lifestyle with Partiers' values, and included events at popular clubs, brand ambassador peer leaders who transmit the anti-tobacco message, social media, and tailored anti-tobacco messaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily and nondaily smoking rates, and binge drinking rates (secondary). RESULTS: Overall, smoking rates did not change (44.1% at Time 1, 45.0% at Time 2, and 47.4% at Time 3; p=0.17), but there was a significant interaction between intervention duration and brand recall. Partiers reporting intervention recall had lower odds of daily smoking (OR=0.30 [0.10, 0.95]) and no difference in nondaily smoking, whereas Partiers who did not recall the intervention had increased odds of smoking (daily AOR=1.74 [1.04, 2.89]; nondaily AOR=1.97 [1.35, 2.87]). Among non-Partiers, those who recalled HAVOC reported no difference in smoking, and those who did not recall HAVOC reported significantly increased odds of smoking (daily AOR=1.53 [1.02, 2.31]; nondaily AOR=1.72 [1.26, 2.36]). Binge drinking rates were significantly lower (AOR=0.73 [0.59, 0.89]) overall. CONCLUSIONS: HAVOC has the potential to affect smoking behavior among Oklahoma Partiers without increasing binge drinking.
Authors: Juliana L Fuqua; Peggy E Gallaher; Jennifer B Unger; Dennis R Trinidad; Steve Sussman; Enrique Ortega; C Anderson Johnson Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: J A Kelly; D A Murphy; K J Sikkema; T L McAuliffe; R A Roffman; L J Solomon; R A Winett; S C Kalichman Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pamela M Ling; Youn Ok Lee; Juliette Hong; Torsten B Neilands; Jeffrey W Jordan; Stanton A Glantz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Meghan B Moran; Matthew W Walker; Tesfa N Alexander; Jeffrey W Jordan; Dana E Wagner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sara Kalkhoran; Nadra E Lisha; Torsten B Neilands; Jeffrey W Jordan; Pamela M Ling Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Kristin V Carson; Faisal Ameer; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Khin Hnin; Joseph Em van Agteren; Fatemeh Sayehmiri; Malcolm P Brinn; Adrian J Esterman; Anne B Chang; Brian J Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-02