| Literature DB >> 25528582 |
Youquan Li1,2, Ze Chen3,4, Zhijie Liu5,6, Junlong Liu7,8, Jifei Yang9,10, Qian Li11, Yaqiong Li12, Qiaoyun Ren13,14, Qingli Niu15,16, Guiquan Guan17,18, Jianxun Luo19,20, Hong Yin21,22.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Theileria and Anaplasma are especially important emerging tick-borne pathogens of animals and humans. Molecular surveys and identification of the infectious agents in Mongolian gazelle, Procapra gutturosa are not only crucial for the species' preservation, but also provide valuable information on parasite and bacterial epidemiology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25528582 PMCID: PMC4279875 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0614-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1(A) and (B) in the blood smears from Mongolian gazelle.
Sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used in this study
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 16S rRNA | EC9 | TACCTTGTTACGACTT | 1462 | Kawahara et al., 2006 [ |
| EC12A | TGATCCTGGCTCAGAACGAACG | ||||
|
| 16S rRNA | AB1f | CTCGTAGCTTGCTATGAGAAC | 551 | Kawahara et al., 2006 [ |
| AB1r | TCTCCCGGACTCCAGTCTG | ||||
|
| 16S rRNA | SSAP2f | GCTGAATGTGGGGATAATTTAT | 641 | Kawahara et al., 2006 [ |
| SSAP2r | ATGGCTGCTTCCTTTCGGTTA | ||||
|
| msp4 | Amargmsp4 F | CTGAAGGGGGAGTAATGGG | 344 | Torina et al., 2012 [ |
| Amargmsp4 R | GGTAATAGCTGCCAGAGATTCC | ||||
|
| msp4 | Aovismsp4 F | TGAAGGGAGCGGGGTCATGGG | 347 | Torina et al., 2012 [ |
| Aovismsp4 R | GAGTAATTGCAGCCAGGGACTCT | ||||
| Hemoparasite | 18S rRNA | Primer A | AACCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT | 1750 | Medlin et al., 1988 [ |
| Primer B | GATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCACCTAC | ||||
|
| 18S rRNA | 989 | AGTTTCTGACCTATCAG | 1100 | Allosop et al., 1993 [ |
| 990 | TTGCCTTAAACTTCCTTG | ||||
|
| 18S rRNA | Tl310 | GGTAGGGTATTGGCCTACTGA | 340 | Yin et al., 2008 [ |
| Tl680 | TCATCCGGATAATACAAGT | ||||
|
| 18S rRNA | Babesia F | TGTCTTGAATACTT(C/G)AGCATGGAA | 950 | Ramos et al., 2010 [ |
| Babesia R | CGACTTCTCCTTTAAGTGATAAC | ||||
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of and based on 18S rDNA sequences.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of and based on 16S rDNA sequences.
Prevalence of and in and ticks in China
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 92 | 87.0% (80/92) | 13.0% (12/92) | 97.8% (90/92) | 78.3% (72/92) | 65.2% (60/92) | 52.2% (48/92) |
|
| 120 | / | / | 80.0% (96/120) | 66.7% (80/120) | 76.7% (92/120) | 0% |
|
| 102 | / | / | 88.2% (90/102) | 35.3% (36/102) | 88.2% (90/102) | 58.8% (60/102) |