| Literature DB >> 25528446 |
Elisabeth Zapatero-Solana1,2,3,4, Jose Luis García-Giménez5,6,7, Sara Guerrero-Aspizua8,9,10,11, Marta García12,13,14,15, Agustí Toll16, Eulalia Baselga17, Maria Durán-Moreno18, Jelena Markovic19,20,21, Jose Manuel García-Verdugo22, Claudio J Conti23,24, Cristina Has25, Fernando Larcher26,27,28,29, Federico V Pallardó30,31,32, Marcela Del Rio33,34,35,36.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Kindler Syndrome (KS) is an autosomal recessive skin disorder characterized by skin blistering, photosensitivity, premature aging, and propensity to skin cancer. In spite of the knowledge underlying cause of this disease involving mutations of FERMT1 (fermitin family member 1), and efforts to characterize genotype-phenotype correlations, the clinical variability of this genodermatosis is still poorly understood. In addition, several pathognomonic features of KS, not related to skin fragility such as aging, inflammation and cancer predisposition have been strongly associated with oxidative stress. Alterations of the cellular redox status have not been previously studied in KS. Here we explored the role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of this rare cutaneous disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25528446 PMCID: PMC4302591 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-014-0211-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Figure 1Oxidative stress profile in Kindler Syndrome Keratinocytes. (a-c) GSSG/GSH ratio as redox profile coefficient was measured by fluorimetry in keratinocytes from patients SK1 (a), SK2 (b), and SK3 (c) and their matched controls. (d-f) GCLC and GCLM gene expression was analyzed by qPCR using GAPDH as reference gene in SK1 (d), SK2 (e), and SK3 (f) and their matched controls, using the method 2-ΔΔCt. (g-i) Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured by HPLC-UV in SK1 (g), SK2 (h), and SK3 (i) and their matched controls. Results represent the means and SD from two independent experiments in triplicate samples. *p < 0.05: statistically significant difference from control value, after t-student test.
Figure 2Redox biosensor experiments. (a and b) Retroviruses encoding either Grx1-roGFP2 (a) or mito-Grx1-roGFP2 (b) cDNAs were used to infect KS patients and control keratinocytes. The Ratio 405/488 nm was calculated in basal state and when H2O2 solution was added to the cells (12.5uM). KS patients present higher ratios than controls even at a basal state (without H2O2 solution), indicating a higher oxidized state in both cytoplasmic and mitochondria compartments. Average values of each experimental group are shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: statistically significant difference from control value, after t-student test.
Figure 3Mitochondrial ultrastructure in KS. Keratinocytes from skin biopsies and cultured keratinocytes from control and KS patients were studied by electron microscopy (EM). (a) Panoramic view of the basal stratum from SK3 patient. (b) Detail of a keratinocyte (squared region in a). (c) Mitochondria from patient SK3 (squared in b). (d) Mitochondria from a control sample. (e,f) EM photomicrographs of mitochondria from control (e) and from patient SK1 (f) cultured keratinocytes. Scale bars: 10 μm (a), 2 μm (b), 200 nm (c, d, e, f). Images shown are representative of each experimental group.
Figure 4Mitochondria distribution and function in KS keratinocytes. (a and b) Mito Tracker Red staining. Note the smeared mitochondria staining in KS keratinocytes (b) as compared to the control cells (a). (c and d) JC-1 staining. Note mitochondrial depolarization in KS keratinocytes as indicated by the decrease in the red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. (e) Quantification of JC-1 staining. Membrane potential reduction was statistically significant (*p < 0.05) after t-student test. Scale bars = 10 μm.