Literature DB >> 25528098

Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm.

Veronica Whitford1, Debra Titone1.   

Abstract

Eye movement measures demonstrate differences in first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) paragraph-level reading as a function of individual differences in current L2 exposure among bilinguals (Whitford & Titone, 2012). Specifically, as current L2 exposure increases, the ease of L2 word processing increases, but the ease of L1 word processing decreases. Here, we investigate whether current L2 exposure also relates to more general aspects of reading performance, including global eye movement measures and how bilinguals use parafoveal information to the right of fixation during L1 and L2 sentence-level reading, through use of a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm (McConkie & Rayner, 1975). We found that bilinguals with high versus low current L2 exposure exhibited increased L2 reading fluency (faster reading rates, shorter forward fixation durations), but decreased L1 reading fluency (slower reading rates, longer forward fixation durations). We also found that bilinguals with high versus low current L2 exposure were more affected by reductions in window size during L2 reading (indicative of a larger L2 perceptual span), but were less affected by reductions in window size during L1 reading (indicative of a smaller L1 perceptual span). Taken together, these findings suggest that individual differences in current L2 exposure among bilinguals also modulate more general aspects of reading behavior, including global measures of reading difficulty and the allocation of visual attention into the parafovea during both L1 and L2 sentence-level reading. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25528098     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  The effect of linguistic background on rapid number naming: implications for native versus non-native English speakers on sideline-focused concussion assessments.

Authors:  John-Ross Rizzo; Todd E Hudson; Prin X Amorapanth; Weiwei Dai; Joel Birkemeier; Rosa Pasculli; Kyle Conti; Charles Feinberg; Jan Verstraete; Katie Dempsey; Ivan Selesnick; Laura J Balcer; Steven L Galetta; Janet C Rucker
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Positive Psychology Broadens Readers' Attentional Scope During L2 Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.

Authors:  Chi Yui Leung; Hitoshi Mikami; Lisa Yoshikawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

3.  The impact of uninformative parafoveal masks on L1 and late L2 speakers.

Authors:  Leigh B Fernandez; Christoph Scheepers; Shanley E M Allen
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 0.957

4.  The Quest for Signals in Noise: Leveraging Experiential Variation to Identify Bilingual Phenotypes.

Authors:  Anne L Beatty-Martínez; Debra A Titone
Journal:  Languages (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Engaging proactive control: Influences of diverse language experiences using insights from machine learning.

Authors:  Jason W Gullifer; Debra Titone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-10-01

6.  The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study.

Authors:  Diego de León Rodríguez; Karin A Buetler; Noëmi Eggenberger; Marina Laganaro; Thomas Nyffeler; Jean-Marie Annoni; René M Müri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-06

7.  Cross-linguistic differences in parafoveal semantic and orthographic processing.

Authors:  Leigh B Fernandez; Christoph Scheepers; Shanley E M Allen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.