Marina Taloyan1,2, Constanze Leineweber3, Martin Hyde4, Hugo Westerlund5. 1. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. marina.taloyan@sll.se. 2. Center for Family Medicine, Academic Primary Healthcare Centers, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 12, 141 83, Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden. marina.taloyan@sll.se. 3. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. constanze.leineweber@su.se. 4. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. martin.hyde@su.se. 5. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. hugo.westerlund@su.se.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Self-rated health (SRH) is a well-established measure within social epidemiology. However, most studies on SRH tend to be amongst the general population, where SRH has been found to be lower in women than in men. Few studies have specifically investigated patterns of SRH just within an employed population. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate whether there are gender differences in reporting suboptimal SRH in an employed Swedish population and (2) study whether these differences could be explained by socio-economic, work-, health- and/or lifestyle-related factors. METHODS: This study is cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2008 wave of Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health, a nationally representative cohort of the Swedish working population. This study includes the responses of 9,756 employed individuals. Logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, income and working hours (full vs. part time), men had significantly higher odds of suboptimal SRH than women OR 1.38 (95 % CI 1.22-1.55). With stepwise inclusion of health factors such as long-standing disease, sleep quality and fatigue, the OR for men increased to 1.65 (95 % CI 1.44-1.89). Gender differences in reporting suboptimal SRH were attenuated to 1.29 (95 % CI 1.11-1.51) with the inclusion of lifestyle factors. However, they remained significant after inclusion of all explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to findings in general population studies, our results show that men in employment have higher odds of suboptimal SRH than their female counterparts. As SRH is an important indicator of health with a strong association with mortality, an excess risk of suboptimal SRH amongst employed men shows that more attention should be paid to men's health in the workplace.
PURPOSE: Self-rated health (SRH) is a well-established measure within social epidemiology. However, most studies on SRH tend to be amongst the general population, where SRH has been found to be lower in women than in men. Few studies have specifically investigated patterns of SRH just within an employed population. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate whether there are gender differences in reporting suboptimal SRH in an employed Swedish population and (2) study whether these differences could be explained by socio-economic, work-, health- and/or lifestyle-related factors. METHODS: This study is cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2008 wave of Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health, a nationally representative cohort of the Swedish working population. This study includes the responses of 9,756 employed individuals. Logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, income and working hours (full vs. part time), men had significantly higher odds of suboptimal SRH than women OR 1.38 (95 % CI 1.22-1.55). With stepwise inclusion of health factors such as long-standing disease, sleep quality and fatigue, the OR for men increased to 1.65 (95 % CI 1.44-1.89). Gender differences in reporting suboptimal SRH were attenuated to 1.29 (95 % CI 1.11-1.51) with the inclusion of lifestyle factors. However, they remained significant after inclusion of all explanatory variables. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to findings in general population studies, our results show that men in employment have higher odds of suboptimal SRH than their female counterparts. As SRH is an important indicator of health with a strong association with mortality, an excess risk of suboptimal SRH amongst employed men shows that more attention should be paid to men's health in the workplace.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gender; Prospective study; Self-rated health; Sweden
Authors: Constanze Leineweber; Hugo Westerlund; Jan Hagberg; Pia Svedberg; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Anton E Kunst; Vivian Bos; Eero Lahelma; Mel Bartley; Inge Lissau; Enrique Regidor; Andreas Mielck; Mario Cardano; Jetty A A Dalstra; José J M Geurts; Uwe Helmert; Carin Lennartsson; Jorun Ramm; Teresa Spadea; Willibald J Stronegger; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jalal K Ghali; Heidi J Krause-Steinrauf; Kirkwood F Adams; Steven S Khan; Yves D Rosenberg; Clyde W Yancy; James B Young; Steven Goldman; Mary Ann Peberdy; JoAnn Lindenfeld Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christina Darviri; Artemios K Artemiadis; Xanthi Tigani; Evangelos C Alexopoulos Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Solja T Nyberg; G David Batty; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Mark Hamer; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Markus Jokela; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Meena Kumari; Ida E H Madsen; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Archana Singh-Manoux; Sakari B Suominen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Andrew Steptoe; Töres Theorell Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321