Literature DB >> 10220021

Gender differences in structural and behavioral determinants of health: an analysis of the social production of health.

M Denton1, V Walters.   

Abstract

This paper explores aspects of the social production of health by focussing on the ways in which levels of health are shaped by structures of social inequality and behaviors or 'lifestyles'. We address two questions: What is the relative importance of the social, structural and behavioral determinants of health? And, are there gender differences in the determinants of health? These questions are explored using multiple regression analyses of data from the 1994 Canadian National Population Health Survey. Two measures of health are used: subjective health status and the Health Utilities Index (a measure of functional health status). By structural determinants we refer to age, family structure, main activity, education, occupation, income and social support. Behavioral determinants include lifestyle factors related to smoking, drinking, weight and physical activity. Findings indicate that the structures of social inequality are the most important determinants of health acting both independently and through their influence on the behavioral determinants of health. There are very real differences in the factors that predict women's and men's health. For women, social structural factors appear to play a more important role in determining health. Being in the highest income category, working full-time and caring for a family and having social support are more important predictors of good health for women than men. Smoking and alcohol consumption are more important determinants of health status for men than women, while body weight and being physically inactive are more important for women than men. Our findings suggest the value of models which include a wide range of structural and behavioral variables and affirm the importance of looking more closely at gender differences in the determinants of health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220021     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00421-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  62 in total

1.  Adjusting distributions of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Gender and health lifestyle: an in-depth exploration of self-care activities in later life.

Authors:  Joseph G Grzywacz; Eleanor Palo Stoller; A Nichol Brewer-Lowry; Ronny A Bell; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-06-01

3.  Gender differences in education related health inequalities in Chinese northern rural areas: 1993 and 2001.

Authors:  J Wu; Y L Lie; K Q Rao; J C Qian; R W Ye; Q Sun; C Y Li; Z Li
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  The health of Canadians on welfare.

Authors:  Nicholas T Vozoris; Valerie S Tarasuk
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Determinants of male health: the interaction of biological and social factors.

Authors:  David M de Kretser
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  When do older adults become "disabled"? Social and health antecedents of perceived disability in a panel study of the oldest old.

Authors:  Jessica A Kelley-Moore; John G Schumacher; Eva Kahana; Boaz Kahana
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2006-06

7.  Personal attributes as determinants of timely care in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G H Esselens; A De Brabander; L Ovaere; G De Brabanter; P Moons; R Westhovens
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Differentiating positive and negative self-rated health: results from a cross-sectional study in Estonia.

Authors:  Rainer Reile; Mall Leinsalu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Do psychosocial work factors and social relations exert independent effects on sickness absence? A six year prospective study of the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  M Melchior; I Niedhammer; L F Berkman; M Goldberg
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Inflammation a possible link between economical stress and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Katalin Gémes; Staffan Ahnve; Imre Janszky
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.