Courtenay R Bruce1, Susan M Miller, Janice L Zimmerman. 1. 1Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2Houston Methodist Hospital System, Houston Methodist Hospital System Biomedical Ethics Program, Houston, TX. 3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 4Houston Methodist Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. 5Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our study objectives were to determine the key sources of moral distress in diverse critical care professionals and how they manage it in the context of team-based models. DESIGN: Qualitative case study methodology using three recently resolved clinical cases. SETTING: A medical and surgical adult ICU in a 900-bed academic, tertiary Houston hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine ICU team members of diverse professional backgrounds interviewed between March 2013 and July 2013. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All members of the ICU team reported experiencing moral distress. Intrateam discordance served as a key source of distress for all healthcare disciplines. Interviewees identified two situations where intrateam discordance creates moral distress: 1) situations involving initiation or maintenance of nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments and 2) situations involving a lack of full disclosure about interventions. Healthcare professionals engaged in a variety of management techniques, which can be grouped according to maladaptive behaviors (pas-de-deux, "fighting," and withdrawing) and constructive behaviors (venting, mentoring networks, and building team cohesion). Maladaptive behaviors were more common in the surgical ICU. Constructive behaviors were more prevalent in the medical ICU and typically used by nurses and ancillary staff members. Physicians report becoming detached as morally distressing cases unfold, whereas nurses report becoming more emotionally invested. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the ways in which moral distress manifests across critical care disciplines in different ICU environments. Our results have potential implications for patient care. First, when clinicians alter the content of their goals-of-care conversations with patients or families to accommodate intrateam discordance (as part of the "pas-de-deux"), subsequent decisions regarding medical care may be compromised. Second, when different team members respond differently to the same case-with nurses becoming more emotionally invested and physicians becoming more withdrawn-communication gaps are likely to occur at critical moral distress junctures. Finally, our findings suggest that physicians and any healthcare professionals in surgical units might be susceptible to unmitigated moral distress because they report less engagement in constructive behaviors to recalibrate their distress.
OBJECTIVE: Our study objectives were to determine the key sources of moral distress in diverse critical care professionals and how they manage it in the context of team-based models. DESIGN: Qualitative case study methodology using three recently resolved clinical cases. SETTING: A medical and surgical adult ICU in a 900-bed academic, tertiary Houston hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-nine ICU team members of diverse professional backgrounds interviewed between March 2013 and July 2013. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All members of the ICU team reported experiencing moral distress. Intrateam discordance served as a key source of distress for all healthcare disciplines. Interviewees identified two situations where intrateam discordance creates moral distress: 1) situations involving initiation or maintenance of nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments and 2) situations involving a lack of full disclosure about interventions. Healthcare professionals engaged in a variety of management techniques, which can be grouped according to maladaptive behaviors (pas-de-deux, "fighting," and withdrawing) and constructive behaviors (venting, mentoring networks, and building team cohesion). Maladaptive behaviors were more common in the surgical ICU. Constructive behaviors were more prevalent in the medical ICU and typically used by nurses and ancillary staff members. Physicians report becoming detached as morally distressing cases unfold, whereas nurses report becoming more emotionally invested. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the ways in which moral distress manifests across critical care disciplines in different ICU environments. Our results have potential implications for patient care. First, when clinicians alter the content of their goals-of-care conversations with patients or families to accommodate intrateam discordance (as part of the "pas-de-deux"), subsequent decisions regarding medical care may be compromised. Second, when different team members respond differently to the same case-with nurses becoming more emotionally invested and physicians becoming more withdrawn-communication gaps are likely to occur at critical moral distress junctures. Finally, our findings suggest that physicians and any healthcare professionals in surgical units might be susceptible to unmitigated moral distress because they report less engagement in constructive behaviors to recalibrate their distress.
Authors: Elizabeth Dzeng; Alessandra Colaianni; Martin Roland; David Levine; Michael P Kelly; Stephen Barclay; Thomas J Smith Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexandria J Robbins; Nicholas E Ingraham; Adam C Sheka; Kathryn M Pendleton; Rachel Morris; Alexander Rix; Victor Vakayil; Jeffrey G Chipman; Anthony Charles; Christopher J Tignanelli Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jennifer Hancock; Tobias Witter; Scott Comber; Patricia Daley; Kim Thompson; Stewart Candow; Gisele Follett; Walter Somers; Corry Collins; Janet White; Olga Kits Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 6.713