| Literature DB >> 25524535 |
Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska1, Dorota Bomba-Opon, Katarzyna Bobrowska, Szymon Kozlowski, Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha, Iwona Szymusik, Piotr Wegrzyn, Miroslaw Wielgos.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate whether phosphorylated IGFBP-1 (phIGFBP-1) in cervical secretion in term and post-term pregnancies can predict spontaneous onset of labor or vaginal delivery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25524535 PMCID: PMC4435902 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3577-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet ISSN: 0932-0067 Impact factor: 2.344
Fig. 1ROC curves used to estimate the cut-off points for the Bishop score (black dot is 6 points) and ultrasound cervical measurement (black dot is 22 mm) for spontaneous onset of labor prediction
Fig. 2ROC curves used to estimate the cut-off points for the Bishop score (black dot is 5 points) and ultrasound cervical measurement (black dot is 25 mm) for successful vaginal delivery prediction
The characteristics for phIGFBP-1, Bishop score and ultrasound cervix assessment in predicting spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery
| Sensitivity (95 % CI) | Specificity (95 % CI) | Positive predictive value (PPV) (95 % CI) | Negative predictive value (NPV) (95 % CI) | Positive likelihood ratio (+LR) (95 % CI) | Negative likelihood ratio (−LR) (95 % CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome—spontaneous onset of labor | ||||||
| IGFBP-1 presence | 0.69 (0.57–0.8) | 0.42 (0.36–0.47) | 0.36 (0.3–0.42) | 0.74 (0.64–0.83) | 1.19 (0.9–1.5) | 0.74 (0.43–1.18) |
| Bishop score (≥6) | 0.53 (0.42–0.66) | 0.55 (0.49–0.61) | 0.37 (0.29–0.45) | 0.71 (0.64–0.78) | 1.2 (0.83–1.67) | 0.84 (0.57–1.18) |
| Ultrasound cervix assessment (≤22 mm) | 0.69 (0.57–0.8) | 0.61 (0.55–0.66) | 0.46 (0.38–0.53) | 0.81 (0.73–0.87) | 1.78 (1.28–2.35) | 0.5 (0.31–0.77) |
| Secondary outcome—successful vaginal delivery | ||||||
| IGFBP-1 presence | 0.67 (0.61–0.72) | 0.48 (0.36–0.6) | 0.73 (0.67–0.79) | 0.41 (0.31–0.51) | 1.28 (0.96–1.89) | 0.69 (0.46–1.07) |
| Bishop score (≥5) | 0.67 (0.61–0.72) | 0.58 (0.46–0.69) | 0.77 (0.7–0.83) | 0.46 (0.36–0.54) | 1.58 (1.12–2.32) | 0.58 (0.41–0.86) |
| Ultrasound cervix assessment (≤25 mm) | 0.7 (0.65–0.75) | 0.71 (0.59–0.81) | 0.84 (0.77–0.89) | 0.54 (0.45–0.61) | 2.44 (1.59–3.98) | 0.42 (0.31–0.6) |
Fig. 3The Kaplan–Meier curves showing the percentage of patients with no active phase of labor after preinduction in time
The characteristics for phIGFBP-1, Bishop score and ultrasound cervix assessment in predicting spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery in nulliparous and parous patients
| Sensitivity (95 % CI) | Specificity (95 % CI) | Positive predictive value (PPV) (95 % CI) | Negative predictive value (NPV) (95 % CI) | Positive likelihood ratio (+LR) (95 % CI) | Negative likelihood ratio (−LR) (95 % CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome—spontaneous onset of labor | ||||||
| Nulliparous | ||||||
| IGFBP-1 presence | 0.67 (0.54–0.79) | 0.4 (0.33–0.46) | 0.37 (0.3–0.44) | 0.69 (0.57–0.8) | 1.11 (0.8–1.46) | 0.84 (0.47–1.42) |
| Bishop score (≥6) | 0.43 (0.3–0.56) | 0.63 (0.56–0.7) | 0.38 (0.27–0.5) | 0.67 (0.6–0.75) | 1.15 (0.69–1.85) | 0.91 (0.63–1.25) |
| Ultrasound cervix assessment (≤22 mm) | 0.71 (0.58–0.82) | 0.67 (0.6–0.73) | 0.54 (0.44–0.62) | 0.81 (0.73–0.88) | 2.14 (1.44–3) | 0.43 (0.24–0.7) |
| Parous | ||||||
| IGFBP-1 presence | 0.8 (0.48–0.96) | 0.47 (0.36–0.52) | 0.33 (0.2–0.4) | 0.88 (0.68–0.98) | 1.5 (0.76–2) | 0.43 (0.07–1.43) |
| Bishop score (≥6) | 0.9 (0.63–1) | 0.31 (0.21–0.34) | 0.33 (0.23–0.37) | 0.9 (0.6–1) | 1.32 (0.8–1.5) | 0.29 (0.01–1.78) |
| Ultrasound cervix assessment (≤22 mm) | 0.6 (0.3–0.85) | 0.47 (0.37–0.55) | 0.27 (0.14–0.39) | 0.78 (0.61–0.92) | 1.13 (0.48–0.9) | 0.86 (0.27–1.9) |
| Secondary outcome—successful vaginal delivery | ||||||
| Nulliparous | ||||||
| IGFBP-1 presence | 0.71 (0.62–0.78) | 0.48 (0.37–0.58) | 0.64 (0.57–0.71) | 0.56 (0.43–0.67) | 1.36 (0.99–1.88) | 0.61 (0.37–1) |
| Bishop score (≥5) | 0.56 (0.47–0.64) | 0.58 (0.47–0.68) | 0.63 (0.54–0.73) | 0.5 (0.4–0.59) | 1.32 (0.89–2) | 0.77 (0.53–1.13) |
| Ultrasound cervix assessment (≤25 mm) | 0.77 (0.68–0.83) | 0.71 (0.6–0.8) | 0.78 (0.69–0.85) | 0.7 (0.59–0.79) | 2.65 (1.72–4.17) | 0.33 (0.21–0.53) |