Literature DB >> 16885664

Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis.

Joan M G Crane1.   

Abstract

Because of the risk of failed induction of labor, a variety of maternal and fetal factors as well as screening tests have been suggested to predict labor induction success. Certain characteristics of the woman (including parity, age, weight, height and body mass index), and of the fetus (including birth weight and gestational age) are associated with the success of labor induction; with parous, young women who are taller and lower weight having a higher rate of induction success. Fetuses with a lower birth weight or increased gestational age are also associated with increased induction success. The condition of the cervix at the start of induction is an important predictor, with the modified Bishop score being a widely used scoring system. The most important element of the Bishop score is dilatation. Other predictors, including transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and biochemical markers [including fetal fibronectin (fFN)] have been suggested. Meta-analyses of studies identified from MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE and published from 1990 to October 2005 were performed evaluating the use of TVUS and fFN in predicting labor induction success in women at term with singleton gestations. Both TVUS and Bishop score predicted successful induction [likelihood ratio (LR)=1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.51-2.20 and LR=2.10, 95%CI=1.67-2.64, respectively]. As well, fFN and Bishop score predicted successful induction (LR=1.49, 95%CI=1.20-1.85, and LR=2.62, 95%CI=1.88-3.64, respectively). Although TVUS and fFN predicted successful labor induction, neither has been shown to be superior to Bishop score. Further research is needed to evaluate these potential predictors and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), another potential biochemical marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16885664     DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  24 in total

1.  Nuchal cord entanglement and outcome of labour induction.

Authors:  Tullio Ghi; Laura D'Emidio; Raffaella Morandi; Paolo Casadio; Gianluigi Pilu; Giuseppe Pelusi
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-10

2.  A novel optical method to assess cervical changes during pregnancy and use to evaluate the effects of progestins on term and preterm labor.

Authors:  Ruben J Kuon; Shao-Qing Shi; Holger Maul; Christof Sohn; James Balducci; Leili Shi; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery.

Authors:  Yukito Minami; Takao Sekiya; Haruki Nishizawa; Jun Miyazaki; Yoshiteru Noda; Risa Ishii; Akira Yasue; Eiji Nishio; Yasuhiro Udagawa; Takuma Fujii
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  The risk factors for failure of labor induction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Emilio Giugliano; Elisa Cagnazzo; Viviana Milillo; Massimo Moscarini; Fortunato Vesce; Donatella Caserta; Roberto Marci
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-12-01

5.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  C Lindblad Wollmann; M Ahlberg; G Petersson; S Saltvedt; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 7.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

8.  Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  F Thangarajah; P Scheufen; V Kirn; P Mallmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers Based on Backscattered Acoustic Power: Potential for Quantifying Remodeling of the Human Cervix during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hallcor
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength.

Authors:  Turhan Aran; Mehmet A Osmanagaoglu; Cavit Kart; Suleyman Guven; Mustafa Sahin; Mesut A Unsal
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.