Literature DB >> 25524240

Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.

Fabio C M Torricelli1, Giovanni S Marchini2, Fernando I Yamauchi2, Alexandre Danilovic2, Fabio C Vicentini2, Miguel Srougi2, Manoj Monga2, Eduardo Mazzucchi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated which variables impact fragmentation and clearance of lower pole calculi after shock wave lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy for a solitary 5 to 20 mm lower pole kidney stone between June 2012 and August 2014. Patient body mass index and abdominal waist circumference were recorded. One radiologist blinded to shock wave lithotripsy outcomes measured stone size, area and density, stone-to-skin distance, infundibular length, width and height, and infundibulopelvic angle based on baseline noncontrast computerized tomography. Fragmentation, success (defined as residual fragments less than 4 mm in asymptomatic patients) and the stone-free rate were evaluated by noncontrast computerized tomography 12 weeks postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Mean stone size was 9.1 mm. Overall fragmentation, success and stone-free rates were 76%, 54% and 37%, respectively. On logistic regression body mass index (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.49, p = 0.004) and stone density (OR 1.0026, 95% CI 1.0008-1.0046, p = 0.005) significantly impacted fragmentation. Stone size (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.48, p = 0.039) and stone density (OR 1.0021, 95% CI 1.0007-1.0037, p = 0.012) impacted the success rate while stone size (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.50, p = 0.029), stone density (OR 1.0015, 95% CI 1.0001-1.0032, p = 0.046) and infundibular length (OR 1.1035, 95% CI 1.015-1.217, p = 0.015) impacted the stone-free rate. The best outcomes were found in patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or less, stones 10 mm or less and 900 HU or less, and an infundibular length of 25 mm or less. The coexistence of significant unfavorable variables led to a stone-free rate of less than 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients with higher than 10 mm density stones (greater than 900 HU) in the lower pole of the kidney with an infundibular length of greater than 25 mm should be discouraged from undergoing shock wave lithotripsy.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; kidney; lithotripsy; obesity; tomography; x-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25524240     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Predicting shockwave lithotripsy outcome for urolithiasis using clinical and stone computed tomography texture analysis variables.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Mafalda D Silva; Andrew W Mills; Bernard V North; Benjamin W Turney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Comparison of Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from the KSER Update Series.

Authors:  Hae Do Jung; Doo Yong Chung; Do Kyung Kim; Min Ho Lee; Sin Woo Lee; Sunghyun Paick; Seung Hyun Jeon; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Fernanda C G Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Carlos Alfredo Batagello; Fabio C M Torricelli; Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.