Literature DB >> 25524020

Family resemblance of bone turnover rate in mothers and daughters--the MODAM study.

H Nagy1, R Chapurlat, E Sornay-Rendu, S Boutroy, P Szulc.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We studied bone turnover markers (BTM) and bone microarchitecture (using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)) in 171 postmenopausal women and their 210 premenopausal daughters. BTM levels correlated positively between mothers and daughters. The mother-daughter pairs with high BTM levels had lower cortical density than those with low BTM levels.
INTRODUCTION: We assessed the correlation of serum bone turnover markers (BTM) between postmenopausal mothers and their premenopausal daughters as well as possible determinants of this association and its impact on resemblance of bone microarchitecture between mothers and their daughters.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis was performed in 171 untreated postmenopausal mothers (54 sustained fragility fractures) and their 210 premenopausal daughters. Intact N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and β-isomerized C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) were measured in the fasting status. Bone microarchitecture was assessed using HR-pQCT.
RESULTS: After adjustment for age, weight, lifestyle factors, hormones, and mother's fracture status, BTM levels correlated positively between mothers and daughters (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.22-0.27, p <0.005). Average BTM levels were ∼ 0.6 SD higher among daughters of mothers in the highest BTM quartile vs. the ones in the lowest BTM quartile. The variability of BTM levels explained ≤ 10 and ≤ 14% of variability of bone microarchitecture in the daughters and mothers, respectively. Cortical density was lower by 2.3-2.9% (0.6 SD, p <0.05 to <0.005) in the daughters from the mother-daughter pairs with high BTM levels (defined by generation-specific quartiles) than in the daughters from the pairs with low BTM levels. Corresponding differences for the mothers were 4.5-4.8% (0.5 SD, p <0.05 to <0.01).
CONCLUSION: BTM levels correlated between postmenopausal mothers and their premenopausal daughters after adjustment for age, weight, mother's fracture status, lifestyle, and hormonal factors. Family resemblance of BTM levels may contribute to family resemblance of some bone microarchitectural parameters, especially of cortical density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25524020     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2974-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  55 in total

1.  Smoking and bone metabolism in elderly women.

Authors:  P B Rapuri; J C Gallagher; K E Balhorn; K L Ryschon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort.

Authors:  M E Arlot; E Sornay-Rendu; P Garnero; B Vey-Marty; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Plasma concentrations of free and non-TeBG bound testosterone in women on oral contraceptives.

Authors:  R R Tremblay; J Y Dube
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Heritability of serum osteoprotegerin.

Authors:  Johnny S H Kwan; Sumei Xiao; Cora Bow; Ching-Lung Cheung; Cissy Soong; Kam S Lau; Pak C Sham; Annie W C Kung
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Short-term changes in calcium but not protein intake alter the rate of bone resorption in healthy subjects as assessed by urinary pyridinium cross-link excretion.

Authors:  S A Shapses; S P Robins; E I Schwartz; H Chowdhury
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Genetic influences on type I collagen synthesis and degradation: further evidence for genetic regulation of bone turnover.

Authors:  A Tokita; P J Kelly; T V Nguyen; J C Qi; N A Morrison; L Risteli; J Risteli; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Circulating amounts of osteoprotegerin and RANK ligand: genetic influence and relationship with BMD assessed in female twins.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen; Jacob Vb Hjelmborg; Paul Kostenuik; Lis S Stilgren; Kirsten Kyvik; Stephen Adamu; Kim Brixen; Bente L Langdahl
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The age-dependency of genetic and environmental influences on serum cytokine levels: a twin study.

Authors:  Arthur A Sas; Yalda Jamshidi; Dongling Zheng; Ting Wu; Jakob Korf; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; Tim D Spector; Harold Snieder
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.861

9.  Genetic determinants of trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral densities and bone microstructure.

Authors:  Lavinia Paternoster; Mattias Lorentzon; Terho Lehtimäki; Joel Eriksson; Mika Kähönen; Olli Raitakari; Marika Laaksonen; Harri Sievänen; Jorma Viikari; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Dan Mellström; Magnus Karlsson; Osten Ljunggren; Elin Grundberg; John P Kemp; Adrian Sayers; Maria Nethander; David M Evans; Liesbeth Vandenput; Jon H Tobias; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genetic influence on bone phenotypes and body composition: a Swedish twin study.

Authors:  Helene Wagner; Håkan Melhus; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  2 in total

1.  Differential relationships between parent-child DXA and pQCT bone measures: Results from the Southampton Women's Survey.

Authors:  C R Holroyd; S Carter; S R Crozier; S D'Angelo; E M Curtis; R J Moon; J H Davies; K A Ward; E M Dennison; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; C Cooper; N C Harvey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.626

2.  Relationship between the Second to Fourth Finger Length Ratio and Calcaneus Quantitative Ultrasound.

Authors:  Yoko Takahata; Kumi Hirokawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.