C R Holroyd1, S Carter2, S R Crozier2, S D'Angelo2, E M Curtis1, R J Moon3, J H Davies4, K A Ward2, E M Dennison5, H M Inskip2, K M Godfrey5, C Cooper6, N C Harvey7. 1. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 2. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Paediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 4. Paediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 5. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 6. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 7. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the associations between indices of bone health in childhood and corresponding parental measures. METHODS: The Southampton Women's Survey characterised 12,583 non-pregnant women aged 20-34 years; 3158 subsequently had singleton live births. In a subset, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone area (BA), bone mineral content (BMC) and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) lumbar spine and total hip were obtained in the parent/offspring (aged 8-9 years) trios. Another subset of children (aged 6-7 years), and their parents, had peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT; 4% and 38% tibia) measures. Using multivariable linear regression we examined relationships between mother/father and offspring, adjusting for parental age, habitual walking speed and education; offspring age and sex; and the corresponding bone measure in the other parent (β-coefficients (95%CI) unit/unit for each bone measure). RESULTS: Data were available for 260 trios with DXA and 99 with pQCT. There were positive associations for BA, BMC and aBMD between either parent and offspring. Mother-child associations were of greater magnitude than father-child; for example, mother-child aBMD (β = 0.26 g·cm-2/g·cm-2 (0.21,0.32)) and father-child aBMD (β = 0.16 g·cm-2/g·cm-2 (0.11,0.21)), P-difference in β = 0.007. In the subset with pQCT there was a positive association for mother-offspring 4% tibial total area (β = 0.33 mm2/mm2 (0.17,0.48)), but little evidence of a father-offspring association (β = -0.06 mm2/mm2 (-0.17,0.06)). In contrast offspring 38% cortical density was more strongly associated with this measure in fathers (β = 0.48 mg·cm-3/mg·cm-3 (0.15,0.82)) than mothers (β = 0.27 mg·cm-3/mg·cm-3 (-0.03,0.56)). In general mother-father differences were attenuated by adjustment for height. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst offspring bone measures are independently associated with those of either parent, the magnitude of the association is often greater for maternal than paternal relationships. These findings are consistent with an in utero influence on offspring growth but might also reflect genetic and/or epigenetic parent of origin effects. SUMMARY: In an established parent-offspring cohort, associations between parent and offspring bone indices were generally greater in magnitude for mother-offspring than father-offspring relationships.
AIM: To investigate the associations between indices of bone health in childhood and corresponding parental measures. METHODS: The Southampton Women's Survey characterised 12,583 non-pregnant women aged 20-34 years; 3158 subsequently had singleton live births. In a subset, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone area (BA), bone mineral content (BMC) and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) lumbar spine and total hip were obtained in the parent/offspring (aged 8-9 years) trios. Another subset of children (aged 6-7 years), and their parents, had peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT; 4% and 38% tibia) measures. Using multivariable linear regression we examined relationships between mother/father and offspring, adjusting for parental age, habitual walking speed and education; offspring age and sex; and the corresponding bone measure in the other parent (β-coefficients (95%CI) unit/unit for each bone measure). RESULTS: Data were available for 260 trios with DXA and 99 with pQCT. There were positive associations for BA, BMC and aBMD between either parent and offspring. Mother-child associations were of greater magnitude than father-child; for example, mother-child aBMD (β = 0.26 g·cm-2/g·cm-2 (0.21,0.32)) and father-child aBMD (β = 0.16 g·cm-2/g·cm-2 (0.11,0.21)), P-difference in β = 0.007. In the subset with pQCT there was a positive association for mother-offspring 4% tibial total area (β = 0.33 mm2/mm2 (0.17,0.48)), but little evidence of a father-offspring association (β = -0.06 mm2/mm2 (-0.17,0.06)). In contrast offspring 38% cortical density was more strongly associated with this measure in fathers (β = 0.48 mg·cm-3/mg·cm-3 (0.15,0.82)) than mothers (β = 0.27 mg·cm-3/mg·cm-3 (-0.03,0.56)). In general mother-father differences were attenuated by adjustment for height. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst offspring bone measures are independently associated with those of either parent, the magnitude of the association is often greater for maternal than paternal relationships. These findings are consistent with an in utero influence on offspring growth but might also reflect genetic and/or epigenetic parent of origin effects. SUMMARY: In an established parent-offspring cohort, associations between parent and offspring bone indices were generally greater in magnitude for mother-offspring than father-offspring relationships.
Authors: Kristin L Popp; Julie M Hughes; Adriana Martinez-Betancourt; Matthew Scott; Victoria Turkington; Signe Caksa; Katelyn I Guerriere; Kathryn E Ackerman; Chun Xu; Ginu Unnikrishnan; Jaques Reifman; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: Bone Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: N C Harvey; M K Javaid; N K Arden; J R Poole; S R Crozier; S M Robinson; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; E M Dennison; C Cooper Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: M Lopuszanska-Dawid; H Kołodziej; A Lipowicz; A Szklarska; A Kopiczko; T Bielicki Journal: Econ Hum Biol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Siân M Robinson; Catherine M Law; David J P Barker; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Nicola J Crabtree; Asma Arabi; Laura K Bachrach; Mary Fewtrell; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Maciej Jaworski; Catherine M Gordon Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 2.617