Literature DB >> 25523428

Predicting progression from cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease with the Disease State Index.

Anette Hall, Jussi Mattila, Juha Koikkalainen, Jyrki Lötjonen, Robin Wolz, Philip Scheltens, Giovanni Frisoni, Magdalini Tsolaki, Flavio Nobili, Yvonne Freund-Levi, Lennart Minthon, Lutz Frölich, Harald Hampel, Pieter Jelle Visser, Hilkka Soininen1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the Disease State Index (DSI) method when predicting progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in patients with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), amnestic or non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, naMCI). The DSI model measures patients' similarity to diagnosed cases based on available data, such as cognitive tests, the APOE genotype, CSF biomarkers and MRI. We applied the DSI model to data from the DESCRIPA cohort, where non-demented patients (N=775) with different subtypes of cognitive impairment were followed for 1 to 5 years. Classification accuracies for the subgroups were calculated with the DSI using leave-one-out crossvalidation. The DSI's classification accuracy in predicting progression to AD was 0.75 (AUC=0.83) in the total population, 0.70 (AUC=0.77) for aMCI and 0.71 (AUC=0.76) for naMCI. For a subset of approximately half of the patients with high or low DSI values, accuracy reached 0.86 (all), 0.78 (aMCI), and 0.85 (naMCI). For patients with MRI or CSF biomarker data available, theywere 0.78 (all), 0.76 (aMCI) and 0.76 (naMCI), while for clear cases the accuracies rose to 0.90 (all), 0.83 (aMCI) and 0.91 (naMCI). The results show that the DSI model can distinguish between clear and ambiguous cases, assess the severity of the disease and also provide information on the effectiveness of different biomarkers. While a specific test or biomarker may confound analysis for an individual patient, combining several different types of tests and biomarkers could be able to reveal the trajectory of the disease and improve the prediction of AD progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25523428     DOI: 10.2174/1567205012666141218123829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res        ISSN: 1567-2050            Impact factor:   3.498


  8 in total

1.  Development of a Late-Life Dementia Prediction Index with Supervised Machine Learning in the Population-Based CAIDE Study.

Authors:  Timo Pekkala; Anette Hall; Jyrki Lötjönen; Jussi Mattila; Hilkka Soininen; Tiia Ngandu; Tiina Laatikainen; Miia Kivipelto; Alina Solomon
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Using the Disease State Fingerprint Tool for Differential Diagnosis of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Ruiz; Anette Hall; Jussi Mattila; Juha Koikkalainen; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Minna Husso; Tuomo Hänninen; Ritva Vanninen; Yawu Liu; Merja Hallikainen; Jyrki Lötjönen; Anne M Remes; Irina Alafuzoff; Hilkka Soininen; Päivi Hartikainen
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  Data-Driven Differential Diagnosis of Dementia Using Multiclass Disease State Index Classifier.

Authors:  Antti Tolonen; Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester; Marie Bruun; Juha Koikkalainen; Frederik Barkhof; Afina W Lemstra; Teddy Koene; Philip Scheltens; Charlotte E Teunissen; Tong Tong; Ricardo Guerrero; Andreas Schuh; Christian Ledig; Marta Baroni; Daniel Rueckert; Hilkka Soininen; Anne M Remes; Gunhild Waldemar; Steen G Hasselbalch; Patrizia Mecocci; Wiesje M van der Flier; Jyrki Lötjönen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Prediction models for dementia and neuropathology in the oldest old: the Vantaa 85+ cohort study.

Authors:  Anette Hall; Timo Pekkala; Tuomo Polvikoski; Mark van Gils; Miia Kivipelto; Jyrki Lötjönen; Jussi Mattila; Mia Kero; Liisa Myllykangas; Mira Mäkelä; Minna Oinas; Anders Paetau; Hilkka Soininen; Maarit Tanskanen; Alina Solomon
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 6.982

5.  Impact of a clinical decision support tool on prediction of progression in early-stage dementia: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  Marie Bruun; Kristian S Frederiksen; Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester; Marta Baroni; Le Gjerum; Juha Koikkalainen; Timo Urhemaa; Antti Tolonen; Mark van Gils; Daniel Rueckert; Nadia Dyremose; Birgitte B Andersen; Afina W Lemstra; Merja Hallikainen; Sudhir Kurl; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Anne M Remes; Gunhild Waldemar; Hilkka Soininen; Patrizia Mecocci; Wiesje M van der Flier; Jyrki Lötjönen; Steen G Hasselbalch
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  Predicting Global Cognitive Decline in the General Population Using the Disease State Index.

Authors:  Lotte G M Cremers; Wyke Huizinga; Wiro J Niessen; Gabriel P Krestin; Dirk H J Poot; M Arfan Ikram; Jyrki Lötjönen; Stefan Klein; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Automatic MRI Quantifying Methods in Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Diagnosis.

Authors:  Antti Cajanus; Anette Hall; Juha Koikkalainen; Eino Solje; Antti Tolonen; Timo Urhemaa; Yawu Liu; Ramona M Haanpää; Päivi Hartikainen; Seppo Helisalmi; Ville Korhonen; Daniel Rueckert; Steen Hasselbalch; Gunhild Waldemar; Patrizia Mecocci; Ritva Vanninen; Mark van Gils; Hilkka Soininen; Jyrki Lötjönen; Anne M Remes
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-02-23

8.  A novel CT-based automated analysis method provides comparable results with MRI in measuring brain atrophy and white matter lesions.

Authors:  Aku L Kaipainen; Johanna Pitkänen; Fanni Haapalinna; Olli Jääskeläinen; Hanna Jokinen; Susanna Melkas; Timo Erkinjuntti; Ritva Vanninen; Anne M Koivisto; Jyrki Lötjönen; Juha Koikkalainen; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Valtteri Julkunen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.804

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.