| Literature DB >> 25522383 |
Jacqueline A M Smith1, D L Bourdet, D L Patil2, O T Daniels2, Y-S Ding2, J-D Gallezot2, S Henry2, K H S Kim2, S Kshirsagar2, W J Martin2, G P Obedencio2, E Stangeland2, P R Tsuruda2, W Williams2, R E Carson2, S T Patil2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monoamine reuptake inhibitors exhibit unique clinical profiles that reflect distinct engagement of the central nervous system (CNS) transporters.Entities:
Keywords: PET; TD-9855; norepinephrine and serotonin transporter; pain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25522383 PMCID: PMC4368888 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyu027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ISSN: 1461-1457 Impact factor: 5.176
Figure 1.TD-9855, 4-[2-(2, 4, 6-trifluorophenoxymethyl)phenyl]piperidine.
In Vitro Pharmacology of TD-9855 at Human Recombinant and Rat Native SERT, NET, and DAT Transporters.
| Species | Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibition: pIC50 | Transporter Binding: pKi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERT | NET | DAT | SERT | NET | DAT | |
| Human | 8.0 (7.8, 8.2) | 8.6 (8.4, 8.7) | 6.8 (6.6, 6.9) | 8.5 (8.5, 8.6) | 8.8 (8.8, 8.9) | 6.7 (6.7, 6.8) |
| Rat | 7.9 (7.8, 7.9) | 8.9 (8.6, 9.1) | 6.9 (6.8, 6.9) | 8.5 (8.3, 8.6) | 8.7 (8.5, 8.9) | N.D. |
Data are expressed as mean pIC50 (negative decadic logarithm IC50) and pKi (negative decadic logarithm Ki) values. Data represents mean (with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses) from 3 to 9 individual experiments. N.D., not determined.
Figure 2.Relationship between TD-9855 plasma concentration and rat spinal cord occupancy at NET (A) and SERT (B). Spinal cord transporter occupancy and TD-9855 plasma concentration were determined at the indicated time-points post-dose (0.3 to 60mg/kg, oral). Symbols represent individual data from all dose levels at the indicated timepoints (n = 4–6/timepoint/dose level).
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameter Estimates for TD-9855 Norepinephrine and Serotonin Transporter Occupancy in Rat Spinal Cord.
| Parameter | Emax (% Occupancy) | EC50 (ng/mL) | keo (hr-1) | K01 (hr-1) | K10 (hr-1) | V/F (L/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERT | 79.0 (53) | 50.8 (87) | 11.0 (86) | 0.777 (108) | 0.319 (81) | 54.8 (66) |
| NET | 92.0 (19) | 11.7 (6.8) | 1.78 (57) |
Final parameter estimates are listed with the coefficient of variation (% CV) on each parameter estimate provided in parentheses.
Figure 3.Average PET binding potential (BP ND) images of NET with [11C]-MRB with a single dose of 20mg or 4mg. Columns 1 and 4 show MR images in sagittal, coronal, and transverse orientations. Columns 2, 3, 5 and 6 show [11C]-MRB binding potential images at baseline and 9.5 to 11.5 hours after administration of 20mg and 4mg of TD-9855. + shows the location of the orthogonal slices, cut through the thalamus.
Apparent NET and SERT Occupancies (r App) Estimated from [11C]-MRB and [11C]-DASB Binding Potentials, Respectively.
|
| TH-9855 Dose | NET Occupancy | SERT Occupancy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 6 | Day 7 | Day 1 | ||
|
| 20 mg | 120.3±6.2 | 2.6±11.6 | 15.5±2.6 | ||
|
| 20 mg | 98.4±4.7 | 62.9±5.0 | 29.1±2.2 | ||
|
| 20 mg | 119.1±8.3 | 96.2±10.2 | 30.5±3.1 | ||
|
| 20 mg | 121.2±4.5 | 124.3±4.9 | |||
|
| 10 mg | 110.3±7.4 | 92.0±10.8 | |||
|
| 4 mg | 42.2±6.4 | 29.6±7.1 | |||
|
| 4 mg | 57.9±4.7 | 57.3±3.8 | |||
|
| 4 mg | 58.7±5.5 | 47.2±6.0 | 3.2±7.8 | ||
Percent occupancy values were obtained from multiple regions and the weighted average of r and its associated standard error (see Methods) are reported in each case.
Figure 4.NET estimated occupancy determined for each subject as a function of the drug plasma concentration. The circles represent the data estimated on Day 1; the diamonds represent the data estimated on Days 3 to 7. Each occupancy value represents a weighted average across regions, where the weighting accounts for the uncertainty of the underlying BP ND estimates. The apparent occupancy data, listed in Table 3, were fitted to a 2-parameter occupancy model to determine EC50 and r max. Apparent occupancy data then were normalized to a maximum occupancy of 100% (i.e., divided by r max), as described in Methods, and represented graphically. The solid line represents the best fit, with a global EC50 (1.21±0.21ng/mL).
Figure 5.Simulation of NET Occupancy after single dose (Day 1) and repeated (steady state) administration of TD-9855 at 4mg and 20mg. Symbols represent observed NET occupancy determinations and solid lines indicate the mean simulated NET occupancy after TD-9855 administration on Day 1 and at steady state. Shaded bands indicate the 95% CI.
Projected NET Occupancy at Steady State After TD-9855 Administration.
| TH-9855 Dose (mg) | Projected Mean (Range) NET Occupancy | |
|---|---|---|
| Max (Range) | Trough (Range) | |
| 20 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
Range reflects 95% CI.
Figure 6.Average PET binding potential (BP ND) images of SERT with [11C]-DASB. Column 1 shows MR images in sagittal, coronal, and transverse orientation. Columns 2 and 3 show [11C]-DASB binding potential images at baseline and 7.5 to 9.5 hours after administration of 20mg of TD-9855. + shows the location of the orthogonal slices, cut through the thalamus.