Literature DB >> 19306894

Target site occupancy: emerging generalizations from clinical and preclinical studies.

Sarah Grimwood1, Paul R Hartig.   

Abstract

What percentage of receptors, ion channels or transporters must be occupied by drugs to trigger therapeutic effects in patients, or by drugs and other ligands to induce physiological effects in humans or animals? Human studies utilizing Positron Emission Tomography and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, along with data from an array of preclinical methodologies, have begun to provide consistent answers to this question. The required target occupancy is dependent upon the molecular class of both target and ligand, and appears to be similar for both patient therapy and human or animal physiology. In the case of antagonists, approximately 60-90% target occupancy is required for G protein-coupled receptors, neurotransmitter transporters, and ligand-gated ion channels. Effective doses of agonists occupy a wider range of their target sites, dependent upon the intrinsic activity of the agonist, the receptor or ion channel reserve of the target site, and the response that is measured, with low efficacy agonists generally requiring high degrees of occupancy while high efficacy agonists generally require low degrees of occupancy. Target desensitization, competition by endogenous ligands, and regional target differences all influence target occupancy requirements. Measurements of target occupancy can help assure proper dosing and targeting of compounds in preclinical and clinical drug development as well as in basic research. Target occupancy generalizations can be especially important in establishing initial dosing recommendations for the many new drug targets provided by genomic and proteomic initiatives, where little data is available on their functional responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306894     DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  32 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of nalmefene in healthy subjects and its relation to μ-opioid receptor occupancy.

Authors:  Lars-Erik Broksoe Kyhl; Shen Li; Kirstine Ullitz Faerch; Birgitte Soegaard; Frank Larsen; Johan Areberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Modeling energy intake by adding homeostatic feedback and drug intervention.

Authors:  Peter Gennemark; Stephan Hjorth; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Guiding dose selection of monoclonal antibodies using a new parameter (AFTIR) for characterizing ligand binding systems.

Authors:  Sameed Ahmed; Miandra Ellis; Hongshan Li; Luca Pallucchini; Andrew M Stein
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Optimal Affinity of a Monoclonal Antibody: Guiding Principles Using Mechanistic Modeling.

Authors:  Abhinav Tiwari; Anson K Abraham; John M Harrold; Anup Zutshi; Pratap Singh
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Modeling of PET data in CNS drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Katarina Varnäs; Andrea Varrone; Lars Farde
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Quantitative pharmacological analysis of antagonist binding kinetics at CRF1 receptors in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Simeon J Ramsey; Neil J Attkins; Rebecca Fish; Piet H van der Graaf
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Cocaine occupancy of sigma1 receptors and dopamine transporters in mice.

Authors:  John R Lever; Emily A Fergason-Cantrell; Lisa D Watkinson; Terry L Carmack; Sarah A Lord; Rong Xu; Dennis K Miller; Susan Z Lever
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Agonistic TAM-163 antibody targeting tyrosine kinase receptor-B: applying mechanistic modeling to enable preclinical to clinical translation and guide clinical trial design.

Authors:  Yulia Vugmeyster; Cynthia Rohde; Mylene Perreault; Ruth E Gimeno; Pratap Singh
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  Two-photon Fluorescence Anisotropy Microscopy for Imaging and Direct Measurement of Intracellular Drug Target Engagement.

Authors:  Claudio Vinegoni; John M Dubach; Paolo Fumene Feruglio; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.544

10.  Novel positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors: do subtle differences in activity at alpha1 plus alpha5 versus alpha2 plus alpha3 subunits account for dissimilarities in behavioral effects in rats?

Authors:  Miroslav M Savić; Samarpan Majumder; Shengming Huang; Rahul V Edwankar; Roman Furtmüller; Srdan Joksimović; Terry Clayton; Joachim Ramerstorfer; Marija M Milinković; Bryan L Roth; Werner Sieghart; James M Cook
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.