Literature DB >> 25521613

Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting.

Alan Pearson1, Zoe Jordan1, Craig Lockwood1, Ed Aromataris1.   

Abstract

The utility of qualitative research findings in the health sciences has been the subject of considerable debate, particularly with the advent of qualitative systematic reviews in recent years. There has been a significant investment in the production of guidance to improve the reporting of quantitative research; however, comparatively little time has been spent on developing the same for qualitative research reporting. This paper sets out to examine the possibility of developing a framework for refereed journals to utilize when guiding authors on how to report the results of qualitative studies in the hope that this will improve the quality of reports and subsequently their inclusion in qualitative syntheses and guidelines to inform practice at the point of care.
© 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Keywords:  evidence-based health; qualitative research; quality; reporting; standards

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25521613     DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1322-7114            Impact factor:   2.066


  3 in total

1. 

Authors:  Judy King; Lucie Brosseau; Paulette Guitard; Chantal Laroche; Julie Alexandra Barette; Dominique Cardinal; Sabrina Cavallo; Lucie Laferrière; Karine Toupin-April; Marie-Ève Bérubé; Jennifer O'Neil; Jessane Castro; Cendy Kidjo; Sandy Fakhry; Ann Sutton; Roseline Galipeau; Jocelyne Tourigny; Josée Lagacé; Catrine Demers; Nicole Paquet; Denyse Pharand; Laurianne Loew; Véronique Vaillancourt; Katrine Sauvé-Schenk
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.

Authors:  Teresa A O'Sullivan; Curtis G Jefferson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool.

Authors:  Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas; Claire Glenton; Andrew Booth; Jane Noyes; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.