Po-Heng Lin1, Michael K Takase, Theodor Agapie. 1. Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Abstract
We report the syntheses and electrochemical properties of nine new clusters ([LLnMn(IV)3O4(OAc)3(DMF)n](+) (Ln = La(3+), Ce(3+), Nd(3+), Eu(3+), Gd(3+), Tb(3+), Dy(3+), Yb(3+), and Lu(3+), n = 2 or 3)) supported by a ligand (L(3-)) based on a 1,3,5-triarylbenzene motif appended with alkoxide and pyridine donors. All complexes were obtained by metal substitution of Ca(2+) with lanthanides upon treatment of previously reported LMn3CaO4(OAc)3(THF) with Ln(OTf)3. Structural characterization confirmed that the clusters contain the [LnMn3O4] cubane motif. The effect of the redox-inactive centers on the electronic properties of the Mn3O4 cores was investigated by cyclic voltammetry. A linear correlation between the redox potential of the cluster and the ionic radii or pKa of the lanthanide metal ion was observed. Chemical reduction of the LMn(IV)3GdO4(OAc)3(DMF)2 cluster with decamethylferrocene, resulted in the formation of LGdMn(IV)2Mn(III)O4(OAc)3(DMF)2, a rare example of mixed-valence [MMn3O4] cubane. The lanthanide-coordinated ligands can be substituted with other donors, including water, the biological substrate.
We report the syntheses and electrochemical properties of nine new clusters ([LLnMn(IV)3O4(OAc)3(DMF)n](+) (Ln = La(3+), Ce(3+), Nd(3+), Eu(3+), Gd(3+), Tb(3+), Dy(3+), Yb(3+), and Lu(3+), n = 2 or 3)) supported by a ligand (L(3-)) based on a 1,3,5-triarylbenzene motif appended with alkoxide andpyridine donors. All complexes were obtained by metal substitution of Ca(2+) with lanthanides upon treatment of previously reported LMn3CaO4(OAc)3(THF) with Ln(OTf)3. Structural characterization confirmed that the clusters contain the [LnMn3O4] cubane motif. The effect of the redox-inactive centers on the electronic properties of the Mn3O4cores was investigated by cyclic voltammetry. A linear correlation between the redox potential of the cluster and the ionic radii or pKa of the lanthanidemetal ion was observed. Chemical reduction of the LMn(IV)3GdO4(OAc)3(DMF)2cluster with decamethylferrocene, resulted in the formation of LGdMn(IV)2Mn(III)O4(OAc)3(DMF)2, a rare example of mixed-valence [MMn3O4] cubane. The lanthanide-coordinated ligands can be substituted with other donors, including water, the biological substrate.
Biological
water oxidation occurs in photosystem II (PSII) at the oxygen-evolving
complex (OEC), an inorganiccluster displaying a Mn4CaOn moiety.[1] Single crystal X-ray
diffraction (XRD) studies have revealed that the OECconsists of a
distorted Mn3CaO4 cubane bridged to the fourth
Mn via oxide moieties.[2] During catalysis,
the OEC undergoes four electron transfer events, leading to a high
oxidation state Mn cluster capable of promoting O–O bond formation
and release of O2.[3] Although
its role remains under debate, the Ca2+ ion is instrumental
for catalysis.[4] Ca2+ has been
proposed to affect the binding and activation of a water substrate
as well as the proton coupled electron transfer and the redox properties
of the cluster.[5] More broadly, metals that
are typically redox inactive at biologically relevant potentials affect
the chemistry of a variety of redox processes,[6] particularly involving transition metals, including dioxygen andperoxide activation,[7] O- and H atom transfer,[8] alkane oxidation,[9] electron transfer rates, and reduction potentials.[10] Crystallographiccharacterization of metal-oxo species
involved in this chemistry that display both the redox inactive and
active metals is rare.[7a,10d] Toward addressing the role of
Ca2+ in PSII, synthetic models have been targeted,[11] with small clusters displaying the biologically
relevant CaMn3O4cubane motif being recently
reported.[12] To facilitate structure–function
studies that interrogate the effect of redox inactive metals in clusters,
we have developed synthetic protocols for heterometallic models of
the biological system that allow for the incorporation of diverse
metals starting from trimetallic precursors and the generation of
site-differentiated clusters.[13] Studies
of structurally related MMn3O4, MMn3O2, MFe3O(OH) clusters revealed a linear dependence
of the reduction potential vs the pKa of the corresponding
metal aqua ion as a measure of Lewis acidity.[13a,13d,13e] The significant slopes (70–100
mV/pKa unit) point to a role of the Lewis acid in
tuning the cluster potential toward the appropriate level necessary
for redox chemistry. Herein, we extend our synthetic, structural,
and electrochemical studies to Mn cubanes displaying lanthanides,
LnMn3O4, to evaluate how their systematic trends
affect the properties of the clusters.The lanthanides are an
appealing choice in investigating systematic effects on the clusters’
physical properties given the monotonicchange in radius andchemical
properties.[14] The preference of the lanthanides
primarily for a single oxidation state simplifies the redox states
available to the clusters.[14] Additionally,
lanthanides have been used as substitutes for Ca2+ in biological
systems because of the similarities in their ionic radii and high
coordination numbers.[15]The [LnMn3O4] cubanes were targeted via a synthetic protocol
previously employed for Zn2+, Sc3+, and Y3+. More Lewis acidicmetals can substitute for Ca2+ in the Mn3CaO4 cubane.[13d,13f] The heteronuclear [LnMn3O4] complexes were
synthesized by treatment of LCaMn3O4(OAc)3(THF) with Ln(OTf)3 (Ln = La3+, Ce3+, Nd3+, Eu3+, Gd3+, Tb3+, Dy3+, Yb3+, Lu3+) in dimethylformamide
(DMF) (Scheme 1). The more Lewis acidiclanthanide
ions readily substitute Ca2+, as supported by ESI-MS data
indicating the incorporation of the respective lanthanide ion and
loss of Ca2+. The 1HNMR spectra of the all
resulting clusters are broad and paramagnetically shifted. Nevertheless,
they show features similar to the starting material, in particular
a broad peak upfield of −15 ppm (see the Supporting Information).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of Lanthanide-Mn-Oxide Clusters
To confirm the formation of
the cubane moiety, we performed single-crystal XRD studies for a subset
of [LnMn3O4] complexes based on the size of
the lanthanide. Clusters displaying large (La3+), intermediate
(Gd3+), and small (Yb3+) lanthanides were selected
for structural characterization in order to provide insight into the
coordination environment as a function of the apical ion size. Dark
brown crystals were grown by slow vapor diffusion of Et2O into a CH2Cl2/DMF (2:1 v/v) solution of the
metalcomplexes, over the course of several days. [LYbIIIMnIV3O4(OAc)3(DMF3)](OTf) (1-Yb) and[LGdIIIMnIV3O4(OAc)3(DMF3)](OTf)
(1-Gd) have very similar structures (see Figure 1), displaying eight-coordinate lanthanide ions:
three bridging oxides, three bridging acetates, and two DMF ligands.
In contrast, the larger La3+ ion (1-La) accommodates
a ninth ligand in an additional DMF molecule. Structural parameters
(Figure 2), reflect the change in average Ln-oxido
bond distances from 2.57 Å (La3+) to 2.35 Å (Yb3+) with the size of the lanthanide. Consequently, the average
Ln-Mn distance decreases from 3.45 Å (La3+) to 3.23
Å (Yb3+). The Mn-oxido distances remain essentially
the same, independent of the nature of Ln.
Figure 1
Solid-state structure
of 1-Yb and the cubane core structures of 1-Gd and 1-La. Outer sphere solvents and anions and hydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 2
Metal-oxido distances of 1-Ln (Ln = La, Gd, and Yb), 2-Gd, and 3-Dy in Å.
Solid-state structure
of 1-Yb and the cubanecore structures of 1-Gd and 1-La. Outer sphere solvents and anions andhydrogen
atoms are omitted for clarity.Metal-oxido distances of 1-Ln (Ln = La, Gd, and Yb), 2-Gd, and 3-Dy in Å.With a series of nine 1-Ln complexes in hand,
the effect of changing the nature of the lanthanide on the redox-properties
of the clusters was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV). The CVs of
all complexes display a quasireversible wave assigned as the [MMnIV3O4]/[MMnIV2MnIIIO4] couple (Figure 3 and
Figures S14–19 in the Supporting Information). The reduction potentials vary within the range of −0.35
(1-Lu) to −0.49 V (1-La) vs the ferrocene/ferroceniumcouple (Fc/Fc+) (see Table S3 in the Supporting Information). Besides the quasi-reversible wave
at −0.46 V assigned to [MMnIV3O4]/[MMnIV2MnIIIO4], the
CV of 1-Ce exhibits an oxidation event at +0.62 V attributed
to the oxidation from CeIII to CeIV.[16] The two overlapping features for the reduction
process at that potential suggest further chemical events following
this oxidation.
Figure 3
Cyclic voltammograms of 1-La, 1-Ce, and 1-Lu in 0.1 M NBu4PF6 solution
in DMA at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Potentials are referenced to Fc/Fc+.
Cyclic voltammograms of 1-La, 1-Ce, and 1-Lu in 0.1 M NBu4PF6 solution
in DMA at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Potentials are referenced to Fc/Fc+.A plot of the E1/2 values vs the pKa values of the lanthanide
aqua ions, M(aqua)3+, revealed a linear correlation (Figure 4).[17a] We have previously reported similar
linear E1/2 vs pKa correlations,[13a,13d,13e] but with wider variation in
the Lewis acidity of the metal and, therefore, over a wider range
of pKa and potential values. For the lanthanide series,
the pKa variation is relatively narrow leading to
a potential range of less than 150 mV. It is notable that even in
this small range, the plot of redox potential vs pKa remains linear.[18] When plotted with
previously reported cubanes, the lanthanide series fits well on the
line (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Plot of reduction potentials
of [LnMn3O4] (green triangle(top and bottom))
and previously reported [MMn3O4] complexes (red
circle(bottom)) vs pKa of the corresponding
M(aqua) ion as a measure of Lewis acidity.
Potentials were referenced to Fc/Fc+.
Plot of reduction potentials
of [LnMn3O4] (green triangle(top and bottom))
and previously reported [MMn3O4] complexes (red
circle(bottom)) vs pKa of the corresponding
M(aqua) ion as a measure of Lewis acidity.
Potentials were referenced to Fc/Fc+.With the expanded series of available M3+ cations
in the composition of the [MMn3O4] cubanes,
the redox potentials were plotted against the radius of M, including
Mn3+, Sc3+, Y3+, andLn3+ (Figure 5).[17b] Here as well, a linear correlation was observed between the potential
and ionic radii of the rare earth ions. As expected, the reduction
potential becomes more negative as the ionic radii increases and the
Lewis acidity decreases. MnIII is well-removed from the
line generated by the rare earth ions. This is likely a consequence
of the different bonding character of these metals.[14] The rare earth elements display primarily ionic interactions,
therefore, the variation in radius is directly correlated to Lewis
acidity giving linear dependence of redox potential vs both pKa and radius. MnIII is more covalent, and the
change in radius does not track directly with its Lewis acidity. Therefore,
the pKa of metal aquo complexes is favored as a measure
of Lewis acidity as it incorporates a composite of effects including
changes in the nature of bonding, radius, charge, and number of ligands.
Figure 5
Plot of
reduction potentials of [LnIIIMn3O4] complexes (green triangle) and other [MIIIMn3O4] complexes (red circle) vs ionic radii of the corresponding
M(aqua) ion.
Plot of
reduction potentials of [LnIIIMn3O4] complexes (green triangle) and other [MIIIMn3O4] complexes (red circle) vs ionic radii of the corresponding
M(aqua) ion.Access to the above heterometallicclusters allows for further
synthetic elaboration. To confirm the nature of the reduced species
evidenced in the CV studies, we performed the chemical reduction of 1-Gd with decamethylferrocene. The reduced species, 2-Gd, was studied by XRD. Comparing the solid state structures
of 1-Gd and2-Gd (Figures 1, 6), the site of reduction is localized
at Mn2 in 2-Gd. The MnIIIcenter displays
an elongation of the O4–Mn2–O16 axis due to population
of a σ-antibonding orbital. The bond lengths along this axis
(2.169(1) Å for Mn2–O4; 2.163(1) Å for Mn2–O16)
are over 0.2 Å longer in comparison to the Mn–oxide bonds
in 1-Gd (1.916(2)–1.941(2) Å) as well as
the Mn–oxide bonds of Mn1 andMn3 in 2-Gd (1.8473(9)–1.897(1)
Å), which are assigned to MnIV centers. 2-Gd represents a rare example of mixed valent heterometalliccluster
structurally related to the OEC. An analogous cluster, [ScMnIV2MnIIIO4], displays a similar localization
of charge at Mn centers.[13d] Oxidation chemistry
was also investigated with 1-Ce, by treatment with tris(p-tolyl)ammoniumyl triflate. A new species was generated
(1HNMR spectroscopy) assigned as the [CeIVMnIV3] cluster, although attempts to grow single crystals
for structural characterization have been unsuccessful to date.
Figure 6
Solid-state
structures of 2-Gd and 3-Dy. Only cubane
core shown, for clarity. The elongated Mn–O bonds in 2-Gd are highlighted in orange.
Solid-state
structures of 2-Gd and 3-Dy. Only cubanecore shown, for clarity. The elongated Mn–O bonds in 2-Gd are highlighted in orange.In addition to redox chemistry, ligand substitution was investigated
with these clusters. In particular, Ca2+-coordinated water
ligands have been proposed to be involved in O–O bond formation
and are observed in the crystal structure of PSII.[2b,5b,5c] In this context investigating the coordination
of water and other ligands to cubaneclusters is of interest. NMR
experiments of 1-Gd in the presence of excess DMF show
only one set of peaks for the ligand indicating fast exchange between
bound and free DMF, that could not be frozen at low temperature (−40
°C) (see Figure S12 in the Supporting Information). Targeting watercoordination, the Ca2+/Dy3+ substitution was performed in the absence of DMF. Crystallization
in the presence of water afforded 3-Dy (Scheme 1) displaying water molecules bound to Dy3+ (Figure 6). The coordination of two water
molecules to the lanthanide ion is reminiscent of the structure of
the OEC.[2b,13a] In addition to modeling substrate binding
as in the biological system, the isolation of 3-Dy also
highlights the stability of the reported clusters in the presence
of water, important for further mechanistic studies.In summary,
mixed metal oxideclusters of Mn and Ln displaying the cubane structural
motif relevant to the OEC have been synthesized and studied. Nine
complexes spanning the lanthanide series have been prepared in the
redox state [LnMnIV3O4] via Ca2+ substitution with Ln3+ from a [CaMnIV3O4] precursor. A linear dependence was observed
between the reduction potentials of these complexes and the pKa of the metal aquo, [Ln(H2O)]3+, or the radius of Ln3+ indicating
that the Lewis acidity of the nonmanganese ion tunes the potential
of the cluster. A rare one-electron-reduced mixed valent cubane, [GdMnIV2MnIIIO4], was characterized
by XRD and showed charge localization displayed by an axial distortion
due to population of a σ-antibonding orbital. Reminiscent of
binding of water molecules to Ca2+ in the biological system,
a cluster displaying two water ligands bound to Dy3+ was
structurally characterized and highlights the stability of the present
models and their suitability for further mechanistic studies related
to PSII.
Experimental Section
General Considerations
Unless otherwise specified, all compounds were manipulated using
a glovebox or standard Schlenk line techniques with an N2 atmosphere. Anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) was purchased from Aldrich
in 18 L Pure-Paccontainers. Anhydrous acetonitrile, benzene, dichloromethane,
diethyl ether, andTHF were purified by sparging with nitrogen for
15 min and then passing under nitrogen pressure through a column of
activated A2 alumina (Zapp’s). Anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was purchased from Aldrich and stored over
molecular sieves. CD2Cl2 was purchased from
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, dried over calcium hydride, then degassed
by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles and vacuum-transferred
prior to use. 1HNMR spectra were recorded on a Varian
300 MHz instrument, with shifts reported relative to the residual
solvent peak. 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian
300 MHz instrument, with shifts reported relative to the internal
lock signal. Elemental analyses were performed by Robertson Microlit
Laboratories, NJ. All commercial chemicals were used as received.
Ln(OTf)3 (Ln= La, Ce, Nd, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Yb, Lu) were
purchased from Strem. LMn3CaO4(OAc)3(THF) was prepared according to the previously published procedure.[13f]
Synthesis of [LLaMn3O4(OAc)3(DMF)3](OTf) (1-La) and
[LLnMn3O4(OAc)3(DMF)2](OTf)
(Ln: Ce (1-Ce), Nd (1-Nd), Eu (1-Eu), Gd (1-Gd), Tb (1-Tb), Dy (1-Dy), Yb (1-Yb), Lu (1-Lu))
A solution
of Ln(OTf)3 (0.02 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added to LMn3CaO4(OAc)3(THF) (0.0274g, 0.02 mmol)
solution in DMF (1 mL). The dark brown solution was stirred for an
hour and then diethyl ether was added to precipitate the red-brown
product. The precipitate was collected over Celite and extracted with
CH2Cl2. The dark brown CH2Cl2 filtrate was concentrated in vacuo andcrystallized from
CH2Cl2/DMF/diethyl ether (1:1:5, v/v) to yield
the product as red-brown crystals.1-La: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 16.6, 11.7,
11.1, 9.2, 7.9, 5.9, 5.3, 4.7, 3.0 1.2, 0.9, −18.5 ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −76.2
ppm. Yield: 88%. Anal. Calcd For C72H68F3LaMn3N9O19S: C, 49.24; H,
3.90; N, 7.18. Found: C, 49.52; H, 3.88; N, 7.03.1-Nd: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ
16.3, 11.5, 10.5, 10.1, 9.5, 5.6, 5.3, 3.5, 1.3, 0.9, −19.0
ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ
−77.1 ppm. Yield: 86% Anal. Calcd For C70H62F3Mn3N8NdO18S: C, 49.42;
H, 3.67; N, 6.59. Found: C, 49.37; H, 3.80; N, 5.61.1-Ce: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ
18.3, 13.5, 13.1, 12.5, 11.5, 10.8, 7.3, 7.2, 3.3, 2.1, −17.0
ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ
−76.4 ppm. Yield: 41%. Anal. Calcd For C73H68CeCl6F3Mn3N8O18S: C, 44.92; H, 3.51; N, 5.74. Found: C, 44.83; H, 3.27;
N, 6.12.1-Eu: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 15.9, 12.0, 11.7, 9.0, 6.8, 6.4,
5.4, 4.9, 4.0, 3.5, 2.7, 2.5, 1.7, 1.2, 1.0, 0.90, −20.46 ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −74.6
ppm. Yield: 95%. Anal. Calcd For C70H62EuF3Mn3N8O18S: C, 49.19; H, 3.66;
N, 6.56. Found: C, 49.24; H, 3.72; N, 6.59.1-Gd: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 16.8, 11.9,
9.3, 6.0, 5.3, 3.0, 1.3, 1.2, −20.8 ppm. 19F NMR
(CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −77.2 ppm.
Anal. Yield: 98%. Calcd For C70H62F3GdMn3N8O18S: C, 49.04; H, 3.65;
N, 6.54. Found: C, 49.13; H, 3.71; N, 6.64.1-Tb: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ
27.1, 17.9, 16.7, 15.3, 12.9, 9.0, 7.5, 6.7, 5.5, 3.6, 1.8, 1.4, 0.0,
−1.4, −17.7 ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −81.2 ppm. Yield: 93%. Anal. Calcd
For C70H62F3Mn3N8O18STb: C, 48.99; H, 3.64; N, 6.53. Found: C, 49.13; H,
3.58; N, 6.46.1-Dy: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 36.1, 21.1, 18.2, 17.3,
15.7, 10.4, 8.0, 5.3, 4.6, 3.4, 2.0, 1.3, −4.0, −16.6–42.0
ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ
−90.4 ppm. Yield: 92%. Anal. Calcd For C70H62DyF3Mn3N8O18S:
C, 48.89; H, 3.63; N, 6.52. Found: C, 48.84; H, 3.70; N, 6.62.1-Yb: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 16.2, 14.5, 13.6, 9.3, 7.5, 5.6, 4.2, 3.7, 2.6,
1.7, 1.5, 1.2, −24.1 ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −78.4 ppm. Yield: 80%. Anal.
Calcd For C73H69F3Mn3N9O19SYb: C, 48.62; H, 3.86; N, 6.99. Found: C, 48.49;
H, 3.66; N, 7.31.1-Lu: 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 14.2, 11.4, 11.0, 8.8, 7.3,
6.7, 5.5, 4.7, 3.7, 2.8, 2.2, 0.5, −23.4 ppm. 19F NMR (CD2Cl2, 282 MHz): δ −76.7
ppm. Yield: 42% Anal. Calcd For C70H62F3LuMn3N8O18S: C, 48.54; H,
3.61; N, 6.47. Found: C, 48.27; H, 3.86; N, 6.64.
Synthesis of 2-Gd
A solution of 1-Gd (0.037 g, 0.02
mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added to a decamethylferrocene (0.007 g, 0.02
mmol) solution in THF (2 mL). The dark brown solution was stirred
overnight. A dark-brown precipitate was collected on a fritted glass
funnel and washed with MeCN (4 mL) to remove the remaining [Cp*2Fe]+. The filter cake was washed with DCM, then
dissolved in benzene/THF (1:1, v/v) andconcentrated in vacuo. The resulting dark brown residue was recrystallized from
DMF/benzene/diethyl ether (1:3:10, v/v) to yield the product as dark
brown crystals. 1HNMR (C6D6, 300
MHz): δ 7.1, 3.5, 3.2,1.6, 1.4, 1.1 ppm. Yield: 49%. Anal. Calcd
for C64H50Cl2GdMn3N6O13: C, 51.11; H, 3.35; N, 5.59. Found: C, 50.92;
H, 3.30; N, 5.81.
Synthesis of 3-Dy
Performed
in air, a solution of Dy(OTf)3 (0.02 mmol) in MeCN (1 mL)
was added to [LMn3CaO4(OAc)3(THF)]
(0.0274g, 0.02 mmol) in DCM (2 mL). Dark brown solution was stirred
magnetically for overnight until the solution became homogeneous.
A single-solvent system was tried but the reaction could not be completed
because Dy(OTf)3 is poorly soluble in DCM and the CaMn3cubane is poorly soluble in MeCN. The solution was filtered
by Celite and the product was concentrated in vacuo. The product was
recrystallized from H2O/MeCN/diethyl ether (1:10:30, v/v)
to yield the product as red-brown crystals. 1HNMR (CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 80.9, 44.5, 22.6, 17.6,
14.3, 11.7, 8.3, 6.2, 5.3, 2.0, 1.5, 1.1, 0.3, −18.5 ppm. Yield:
91%. Anal. Calcd for C69H63Cl6DyF3Mn3N9O19S: C, 43.09; H, 3.30;
N, 5.10. Found: C, 42.82; H, 2.90; N, 5.17.
Synthesis of [LMn3CeO4(OAc)3(DMF)3](OTf)2
In glovebox, a solution of 1-Ce (75 mg, 0.042
mmol) in DCM (5 mL) was added with a DCM (5 mL) solution of tris(p-tolyl)ammoniumyl triflate (29.4 mg, 0.047 mmol), which
was synthesized following procedure in the literature.[19] Color of the solution turned from dark brown
to dark orange brown. Mixture was stirred magnetically for 10 min
and dried in vacuo. Diethyl ether was added to wash
the mixture until filtrate cake becoming colorless and solid was collected
over Celite. The filter cake was dissolved in DCM (∼5 mL) and
the mixture was filtered through Celite. The filtrate was concentrated
in vacuo to yield crystalline dark brown product. 1HNMR
(CD2Cl2, 300 MHz): δ 11.8, 9.7, 6.0, 4.5,
3.2, 23.2 pm. Yield: 95%. Anal. Calcd For C76H73CeCl4F6Mn3N9O22S2: C, 43.69; H, 3.52; N, 6.03. Found: C, 43.97; H, 3.19;
N, 6.30.
Authors: Pannee Leeladee; Regina A Baglia; Katharine A Prokop; Reza Latifi; Sam P de Visser; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Davide Lionetti; Sandy Suseno; Emily Y Tsui; Luo Lu; Troy A Stich; Kurtis M Carsch; Robert J Nielsen; William A Goddard; R David Britt; Theodor Agapie Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Yohei Sano; Nathanael Lau; Andrew C Weitz; Joseph W Ziller; Michael P Hendrich; A S Borovik Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Heui Beom Lee; Angela A Shiau; David A Marchiori; Paul H Oyala; Byung-Kuk Yoo; Jens T Kaiser; Douglas C Rees; R David Britt; Theodor Agapie Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Rachel L Meyer; Montaha H Anjass; Brittney E Petel; William W Brennessel; Carsten Streb; Ellen M Matson Journal: Chemistry Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 5.236