Literature DB >> 2552089

Symphysis-fundus measurements in screening for small-for-dates infants: a community based study in Gloucestershire.

J M Stuart, T J Healy, M Sutton, G R Swingler.   

Abstract

Symphysis-fundus charts were introduced into 50 general practitioner antenatal clinics and the hospital antenatal clinics of two obstetricians in Gloucestershire in February 1985 for a 12-month period. Of the 1139 charts analysed, the sensitivity of one or more low fundal height measurements in predicting birthweight below the tenth centile for gestational age was 51% with a specificity of 88%. In the 319 charts with four or more measurements after 26 weeks gestation a sensitivity of 65% was recorded in predicting birthweight below the tenth centile, rising to 91% in the prediction of birthweight below the fifth centile; the specificity was correspondingly 81% and 80%. The sensitivity of the test varied inversely with maternal body mass index. The mean absolute difference in pairs of observations between general practitioners, midwives and an observer was 1.5 cm. Measurement of symphysis-fundus distance is not a precise diagnostic tool but it does provide an improvement on abdominal palpation in the prediction of small-for-dates infants. The findings of this study support the use of serial symphysis-fundus measurements in community antenatal clinics. Referral for ultrasound investigation is recommended when the measurement is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2552089      PMCID: PMC1711768     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  17 in total

1.  Pregnancy characteristics of intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  J A Low; R S Galbraith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  A growth chart for premature and other infants.

Authors:  D Gairdner; J Pearson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  The assessment of fetal growth.

Authors:  A M Thomson; W Z Billewicz; F E Hytten
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1968-09

4.  Growth of low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  S G Babson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Is routine antenatal care worth while?

Authors:  M H Hall; P K Chng; I MacGillivray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height.

Authors:  J M Belizán; J Villar; J C Nardin; J Malamud; L S De Vicurna
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Gravidogram and fetal growth. Comparison with biochemical supervision.

Authors:  B Westin
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Prediction of small-for-dates infants by measurement of symphysial-fundal-height.

Authors:  P Quaranta; R Currell; C W Redman; J S Robinson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1981-02

9.  Antenatal detection of growth retardation: actual practice in a large maternity hospital.

Authors:  K Rosenberg; J M Grant; M Hepburn
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-01

10.  Mortality and morbidity of fetal growth retardation.

Authors:  P C Dobson; D A Abell; N A Beischer
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.100

View more
  6 in total

1.  Antenatal care project.

Authors:  R N Haworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Maternal mid-upper arm circumference is associated with birth weight among HIV-infected Malawians.

Authors:  Roshan T Ramlal; Martin Tembo; Alice Soko; Maggie Chigwenembe; Sascha Ellington; Dumbani Kayira; Caroline C King; Charles Chasela; Denise Jamieson; Charles van der Horst; Margaret E Bentley; Linda S Adair
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.080

3.  Prenatal predictors of cesarean section due to labor arrest.

Authors:  D M Harper; C A Johnson; W H Harper; B S Liese
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Angela E Carberry; Adrienne Gordon; Diana M Bond; Jon Hyett; Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Heather E Jeffery
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-16

5.  Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Lisa J White; Sue J Lee; Kasia Stepniewska; Julie A Simpson; Saw Lu Mu Dwell; Ratree Arunjerdja; Pratap Singhasivanon; Nicholas J White; Francois Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Symphysis-fundus height measurement to predict small-for-gestational-age status at birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aase Serine D Pay; Johanna Wiik; Bjørn Backe; Bo Jacobsson; Annika Strandell; Atle Klovning
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.