| Literature DB >> 25520527 |
Jeanette Whitaker1, Nicholas Ostle2, Andrew T Nottingham3, Adan Ccahuana4, Norma Salinas5, Richard D Bardgett6, Patrick Meir7, Niall P McNamara1, Amy Austin1.
Abstract
1. The Andes are predicted to warm by 3-5 °C this century with the potential to alter the processes regulatingEntities:
Keywords: bacterial; carbon substrates; decomposition; ecosystem function; fungal; microbial community composition; montane cloud forest; plant–soil (below-ground) interactions
Year: 2014 PMID: 25520527 PMCID: PMC4263258 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ecol ISSN: 0022-0477 Impact factor: 6.256
Summary of site characteristics along the elevation gradient (Aragao ; Girardin ; Quesada ; Clark ; Gurdak ; Asner )
| Site name | Site code | Elevation (m asl) | Lat | Long | Mean annual temp (°C) | Annual precipitation (mm year−1) | Organic layer (cm) | Aspect (deg) | Slope (deg) | Parent material | Soil classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explorer's Inn plot 4 (TP4) | TAM-06 | 194 | −12.839 | −69.296 | 26.4 | 2730 | 0.7 | 169.4 | 4.0 | Holocene alluvial terrace | Haplic Alisol |
| Explorer's Inn plot 3 (TP3) | TAM-05 | 210 | −12.830 | −69.271 | 26.4 | 3199 | 2.5 | 186.2 | 6.0 | Pleistocene alluvial terrace | Haplic Cambisol |
| Villa Carmen | VC | 1000 | −12.866 | −71.401 | 20.7 ± 0.02 | 3087 | 3.6 | na | na | na | na |
| San Pedro 2 | SPD-2 | 1500 | −13.049 | −71.537 | 17.4 ± 1.5 | 2631 | 16.0 | 143.5 | 22.7 | Plutonic intrusion (granite) | Cambisol |
| San Pedro 1 | SPD-1 | 1750 | −13.047 | −71.543 | 15.8 ± 1.3 | 2631 | 9.6 | 141.9 | 40.1 | Plutonic intrusion (granite) | Cambisol |
| Trocha Union 8 | TRU-08 | 1850 | −13.071 | −71.555 | 16.0 ± 1.3 | 2472 | 15.6 | 137.0 | 41.8 | Plutonic intrusion (granite) | Cambisol |
| Trocha Union 7 | TRU-07 | 2020 | −13.074 | −71.559 | 14.9 ± 1.1 | 1827 | 16.8 | na | 18.0 | Palaeozoic shales-slates (granite) | Cambisol |
| Trocha Union 5 | TRU-05 | 2520 | −13.094 | −71.574 | 12.1 ± 1.0 | na | 13.6 | na | na | Palaeozoic shales-slates | na |
| Trocha Union 4 | TRU-04 | 2720 | −13.107 | −71.589 | 11.1 ± 1.0 | 2318 | 21.4 | 189.8 | 21.0 | Palaeozoic shales-slates | Umbrisol |
| Trocha Union 3 | TRU-03 | 3020 | −13.109 | −71.600 | 9.5 ± 1.0 | 1776 | 17.2 | 129.3 | 12.0 | Palaeozoic shales-slates | Umbrisol |
| Wayqecha | WAY-01 | 3025 | −13.190 | −71.587 | 11.1 ± 1.2 | 1706 | 22.8 | na | 18.2 | Palaeozoic shales-slates | Umbrisol |
| Trocha Union 2 | TRU-02 | 3200 | −13.111 | −71.604 | 8.9 ± 1.0 | na | 11.8 | na | na | Palaeozoic shales-slates | Umbrisol |
| Trocha Union 1 | TRU-01 | 3400 | −13.114 | −71.607 | 7.7 ± 1.1 | 2555 | 14.0 | 144.3 | 34.3 | Palaeozoic shales-slates | Umbrisol |
Asner 25-ha plot.
Gurdak 1-ha plot.
Huasco (unpublished) 1-ha plot.
na, data not available.
Carbon substrate characteristics and biogeochemical relevance
| Substrate | Complexity | Classification | Ecological relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Simple | Monosaccharide | Product of decomposition processes |
| Xylose | Simple | Monosaccharide | Main building block for hemicellulose |
| Cellobiose | Simple | Disaccharide | Produced during hydrolysis of cellulose |
| Glycine | Simple | Amino acid | Root exudate, N source |
| N-acetyl glucosamine | Simple | Amino sugar | Product of chitin degradation |
| Vanillin | Intermediate | Benzaldehyde | Product of lignin depolymerization |
| Hemicellulose | Complex | Polysaccharide | Constituent of plant cell walls |
| Cellulose | Complex | Polysaccharide | Constituent of plant cell walls |
| Lignin | Complex | Complex organic polymer | Constituent of plant cell walls |
Figure 1Soil chemical and physical properties along the elevation gradient (a) total C (●) and N (○) (%), (b) soil C:N ratio, (c) Microbial biomass C (●) and N (○) (μg g−1 soil dwt), (d) bulk density (g dwt cm−3), (e) soil pH and (f) basal respiration under standardized laboratory conditions (20 °C, 80% WHC). Data represent mean ± SE (n = 5). Statistical analysis is presented in Table3.
Relationships between soil properties and elevation analysed by linear regression (R project). Data illustrated in Figs1 and 2. Non-normal data were square-root- or reciprocal-transformed and checked for normality and homogeneity of variance prior to analysis
| Elevation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total soil C (%) | 0.538 | 75.55 | <0.001 |
| Total soil N (%) | 0.528 | 72.68 | <0.001 |
| Soil C:N | 0.617 | 104 | <0.001 |
| Bulk density of 0–10 cm depth | 0.368 | 39.63 | <0.001 |
| Soil pH | 0.193 | 16.1 | <0.001 |
| Microbial biomass C | 0.457 | 54.06 | <0.001 |
| Microbial biomass N | 0.223 | 19.06 | <0.001 |
| Total PLFA | 0.651 | 120.3 | <0.001 |
| Fungal PLFA | 0.711 | 158.8 | <0.001 |
| Bacterial PLFA | 0.559 | 82.01 | <0.001 |
| Gram-positive PLFA | 0.510 | 65.67 | <0.001 |
| Gram-negative PLFA | 0.581 | 87.43 | <0.001 |
| F:B PLFA | 0.703 | 152.2 | <0.001 |
| GP:GN PLFA | 0.428 | 48.96 | <0.001 |
Figure 2Indicators of microbial biomass and community composition of soils along the elevation gradient: (a) total PLFA, (b) fungal (●) and bacterial (○) PLFA, (c) F:B PLFA, (d) F:B biomass C, (e) gram-positive (●) and gram-negative (○) PLFA and (f) GP:GN PLFA. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 5). Statistical analysis is presented in Table3.
Figure 3Soil respiration responses to nine C substrates over a range of concentrations (0.002–2.0 mg C g−1 soil f. wt.) in tropical forest soils from four elevations. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3) of the additional CO2 flux (SIR-BR). SIR, substrate-induced respiration; BR, basal respiration.
Figure 4Soil respiration responses to four C substrates in 11 soils from a tropical elevation gradient incubated at 20 °C. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 5) of the additional CO2 flux (SIR-BR). Two-way anova and Tukey's HSD pairwise comparisons are presented in Table3 and Table S1. SIR, substrate-induced respiration; BR, basal respiration.
Differences in respiration response to substrates of varying complexity in soils from an elevation gradient (Fig.4). Additional CO2 flux data (square-root-transformed) analysed by two-way anova with soil and substrate as factors. Pairwise comparisons were performed by Tukey's HSD and are presented in Table S1
| Term | d.f. | Sum Sq | Mean Sq | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil | 9 | 606.0 | 67.34 | 124.87 | <0.0001 |
| Substrate | 3 | 493.7 | 164.57 | 305.20 | <0.0001 |
| Soil * substrate | 27 | 51.6 | 1.91 | 3.54 | <0.0001 |
| Residuals | 159 | 85.7 | 0.54 |
Linear mixed effects model to determine the relationships between basal (BR) and additional CO2 fluxes (SIR-BR) and soil abiotic and biotic properties in 11 soils from the elevation gradient
| Term | Control (BR) | All substrates (SIR-BR) | Xylose (SIR-BR) | Glycine (SIR-BR) | Vanillin (SIR-BR) | Hemicellulose (SIR-BR) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Adj. | % Adj. | % Adj. | % Adj. | % Adj. | % Adj. | |||||||
| pH | 1.17 | 5.96 | ns | 1.61 | 0.82 | ns | 10.63 | – | – | |||
| Total C | 4.45 | – | – | 6.04 | – | – | – | – | 3.40 | |||
| Total N | 7.36 | – | – | 7.82 | ns | 10.44 | – | – | 7.55 | |||
| C:N | 9.07 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Total PLFA | – | – | 3.14 | – | – | – | – | 2.44 | – | – | ||
| Bacterial PLFA | – | – | 4.65 | – | – | – | – | 3.90 | – | – | ||
| F:B PLFA | 1.34 | ns | 35.08 | ns | 15.76 | 5.66 | ns | 31.68 | ns | 14.90 | ||
| GP:GN PLFA | 0.27 | ns | – | – | 14.57 | ns | 11.84 | ns | – | – | 9.35 | |
| Total variance explained (Adj | 0.813 | 0.334 | 0.604 | 0.652 | 0.666 | 0.586 | ||||||
The relative contribution (%) of each term in explaining model variance was calculated as % difference in adjusted R2 comparing the full refined model and the model with each term removed. Microbial biomass C and N and fungal PLFA were removed during model refinement.
SIR, substrate-induced respiration; BR, basal respiration.
Symbols indicate the presence or the significance of the term within the refined model: –, not present in refined model; ns, not significant
=P < 0.05
= P < 0.01.