Literature DB >> 23953244

Warming effects on greenhouse gas fluxes in peatlands are modulated by vegetation composition.

Susan E Ward1, Nicholas J Ostle, Simon Oakley, Helen Quirk, Peter A Henrys, Richard D Bardgett.   

Abstract

Understanding the effects of warming on greenhouse gas feedbacks to climate change represents a major global challenge. Most research has focused on direct effects of warming, without considering how concurrent changes in plant communities may alter such effects. Here, we combined vegetation manipulations with warming to investigate their interactive effects on greenhouse gas emissions from peatland. We found that although warming consistently increased respiration, the effect on net ecosystem CO2 exchange depended on vegetation composition. The greatest increase in CO2 sink strength after warming was when shrubs were present, and the greatest decrease when graminoids were present. CH4 was more strongly controlled by vegetation composition than by warming, with largest emissions from graminoid communities. Our results show that plant community composition is a significant modulator of greenhouse gas emissions and their response to warming, and suggest that vegetation change could alter peatland carbon sink strength under future climate change.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHzzm3219904; COzzm3219902; Carbon cycle; N2O; greenhouse gas; peatland; plant community composition; plant functional group; warming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953244     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  15 in total

1.  Contrasting growth responses of dominant peatland plants to warming and vegetation composition.

Authors:  Tom N Walker; Susan E Ward; Nicholas J Ostle; Richard D Bardgett
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Plant community feedbacks and long-term ecosystem responses to multi-factored global change.

Authors:  J Adam Langley; Bruce A Hungate
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  Microbial community composition explains soil respiration responses to changing carbon inputs along an Andes-to-Amazon elevation gradient.

Authors:  Jeanette Whitaker; Nicholas Ostle; Andrew T Nottingham; Adan Ccahuana; Norma Salinas; Richard D Bardgett; Patrick Meir; Niall P McNamara; Amy Austin
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 6.256

4.  Combination of herbivore removal and nitrogen deposition increases upland carbon storage.

Authors:  Stuart W Smith; David Johnson; Samuel L O Quin; Kyle Munro; Robin J Pakeman; René van der Wal; Sarah J Woodin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Colonization of a Deglaciated Moraine: Contrasting Patterns of Carbon Uptake and Release from C3 and CAM Plants.

Authors:  Elisa Varolo; Damiano Zanotelli; Leonardo Montagnani; Massimo Tagliavini; Stefan Zerbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recovery of plant communities after ecological restoration of forestry-drained peatlands.

Authors:  Tuomas Haapalehto; Riikka Juutinen; Santtu Kareksela; Markku Kuitunen; Teemu Tahvanainen; Hilja Vuori; Janne S Kotiaho
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Diverse fen plant communities enhance carbon-related multifunctionality, but do not mitigate negative effects of drought.

Authors:  Bjorn J M Robroek; Vincent E J Jassey; Boudewijn Beltman; Mariet M Hefting
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Vascular plants promote ancient peatland carbon loss with climate warming.

Authors:  Tom N Walker; Mark H Garnett; Susan E Ward; Simon Oakley; Richard D Bardgett; Nicholas J Ostle
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Taxonomic and functional turnover are decoupled in European peat bogs.

Authors:  Bjorn J M Robroek; Vincent E J Jassey; Richard J Payne; Magalí Martí; Luca Bragazza; Albert Bleeker; Alexandre Buttler; Simon J M Caporn; Nancy B Dise; Jens Kattge; Katarzyna Zając; Bo H Svensson; Jasper van Ruijven; Jos T A Verhoeven
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks.

Authors:  Franciska T de Vries; Rob I Griffiths; Mark Bailey; Hayley Craig; Mariangela Girlanda; Hyun Soon Gweon; Sara Hallin; Aurore Kaisermann; Aidan M Keith; Marina Kretzschmar; Philippe Lemanceau; Erica Lumini; Kelly E Mason; Anna Oliver; Nick Ostle; James I Prosser; Cecile Thion; Bruce Thomson; Richard D Bardgett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.