Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) have been the subject of considerable pharmaceutical-design efforts because of the ubiquitous connections between misregulation of PTP activity and human disease. PTP-inhibitor discovery has been hampered, however, by the difficulty in identifying cell-permeable compounds that can selectively target PTP active sites, and no PTP inhibitors have progressed to the clinic. The identification of allosteric sites on target PTPs therefore represents a potentially attractive solution to the druggability problem of PTPs. Here we report that the oncogenic PTP Shp2 contains an allosteric-inhibition site that renders the enzyme sensitive to potent and selective inhibition by cell-permeable biarsenical compounds. Because Shp2 contains no canonical tetracysteine biarsenical-binding motif, the enzyme's inhibitor-binding site is not readily predictable from its primary or three-dimensional structure. Intriguingly, however, Shp2's PTP domain does contain a cysteine residue (C333) at a position that is removed from the active site and is occupied by proline in other classical PTPs. We show that Shp2's unusual cysteine residue constitutes part of a Shp2-specific allosteric-inhibition site, and that Shp2's sensitivity to biarsenicals is dependent on the presence of the naturally occurring C333. The determinative role of this residue in conferring inhibitor sensitivity is surprising because C333's side chain is inaccessible to solvent in Shp2 crystal structures. The discovery of this cryptic Shp2 allosteric site may provide a means for targeting Shp2 activity with high specificity and suggests that buried-yet-targetable allosteric sites could be similarly uncovered in other protein families.
Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) have been the subject of considerable pharmaceutical-design efforts because of the ubiquitous connections between misregulation of PTP activity and human disease. PTP-inhibitor discovery has been hampered, however, by the difficulty in identifying cell-permeable compounds that can selectively target PTP active sites, and no PTP inhibitors have progressed to the clinic. The identification of allosteric sites on target PTPs therefore represents a potentially attractive solution to the druggability problem of PTPs. Here we report that the oncogenic PTPShp2 contains an allosteric-inhibition site that renders the enzyme sensitive to potent and selective inhibition by cell-permeable biarsenical compounds. Because Shp2 contains no canonical tetracysteine biarsenical-binding motif, the enzyme's inhibitor-binding site is not readily predictable from its primary or three-dimensional structure. Intriguingly, however, Shp2's PTP domain does contain a cysteine residue (C333) at a position that is removed from the active site and is occupied by proline in other classical PTPs. We show that Shp2's unusual cysteine residue constitutes part of a Shp2-specific allosteric-inhibition site, and that Shp2's sensitivity to biarsenicals is dependent on the presence of the naturally occurring C333. The determinative role of this residue in conferring inhibitor sensitivity is surprising because C333's side chain is inaccessible to solvent in Shp2 crystal structures. The discovery of this cryptic Shp2 allosteric site may provide a means for targeting Shp2 activity with high specificity and suggests that buried-yet-targetable allosteric sites could be similarly uncovered in other protein families.
The protein
tyrosine phosphatases
(PTPs) constitute a large family of signaling enzymes that dephosphorylate
specific phosphotyrosine residues in protein substrates.[1] Tight control of PTP activity is critical for
maintaining appropriate levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated signaling
proteins, and aberrant PTP activity contributes to a wide range of
human diseases.[2,3] Src-homology-2-domain-containing
PTP 2 (Shp2) provides a particularly striking example of the connection
between misregulation of PTP activity and human pathogenesis: germline
Shp2 mutations cause Noonan and Leopard syndromes, both of which can
lead to cancer predisposition.[4−6] Moreover, somatic Shp2 mutations
are the most common cause of sporadic juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia.[7,8]Because of its associations with human disease, Shp2 has been
the
subject of significant pharmaceutical-discovery efforts.[9−12] Although moderately selective active-site-directed inhibitors of
Shp2 have been identified, Shp2-inhibitor discovery often suffers
from the same limitations that have led to the general characterization
of PTPs as undruggable;[13] specifically,
active-site-directed PTP inhibitors often suffer from a lack of target
specificity (classical PTP active sites share a high degree of sequence
and structural homology) and poor bioavailability (most of the known
PTP-binding pharmacophores contain negatively charged phosphotyrosine
mimetics that lower a putative inhibitor’s cellular permeability).The factors that have limited success in the field of active-site-directed
PTP inhibitors generally—Shp2 inhibitors specifically—point
to the need for the discovery of new allosteric sites. Previous reports
have shown that PTPs can be inhibited allosterically by targeting
protein regions outside of their catalytic domains,[14,15] and, more relevantly to the work presented here, that PTP catalytic
domains can themselves contain targetable allosteric-inhibition sites.[16,17] In particular, the catalytic domain of PTP1B (39% PTP-domain identity
with Shp2) can be inhibited allosterically by two distinct mechanisms
of action. Weismann and co-workers discovered an allosteric site on
PTP1B that is approximately 20 Å from the enzyme’s active
site and showed that small molecules that noncovalently bind the allosteric
site are capable of inhibiting the enzyme, albeit with moderate (low
micromolar) potency.[17] Hansen and co-workers
later demonstrated that PTP1B could be inhibited covalently via modification
of a non-active-site cysteine residue (C121 in humanPTP1B) by high
concentrations (high micromolar to millimolar) of the electrophilic
reagent 4-(aminosulfonyl)-7-fluoro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (ABDF).[16] The selectivity of ABDF among PTPs is likely
very low, however, as the compound’s amino acid target, C121,
is highly conserved among mammalian classical PTPs.[1]Taken together, these seminal studies on allosteric
inhibition
of PTP1B have been critical for establishing the idea that allosteric
sites may indeed exist on PTP domains, but the compounds discovered
to date that target these sites exhibit only moderate to weak potency
and selectivity. No catalytic-domain allosteric sites that allow a
PTP to be targeted with high selectivity have been discovered, and
beyond PTP1B, allosteric-inhibition sites have not been discovered
on the PTP domains of the remaining members of the classical PTP family.
Here we report the discovery of a cryptic allosteric site on Shp2’s
catalytic domain. The Shp2-specific allosteric-inhibition site comprises
two cysteine residues, one conserved (C367, Shp2’s position
analogous to C121 of PTP1B) and one at a position that is occupied
by proline in most other classical PTPs (C333). Our results demonstrate
that the presence of both of these cysteine residues, almost unique
among classical PTPs to Shp2, renders the enzyme sensitive to selective
and potent allosteric inhibition by cysteine-reactive cell-permeable
biarsenical compounds.
Materials and Methods
General
All details
for the cloning, mutagenesis, expression,
and purification of the PTP constructs described in the text can be
found in the Supporting Information. FlAsH-EDT2 (FlAsH) was synthesized as described previously.[18−20] ReAsH-EDT2 was purchased from Life Technologies as a
2 mM stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Fluorescein was
purchased from Acros. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Stock solutions and dilutions
of biarsenical compounds and fluorescein were prepared in DMSO, which
was added to the negative controls for all assays that investigated
these compounds. Stock solutions and dilutions of As2O3 were prepared in aqueous sodium hydroxide (250 μM),
which was added to the negative controls for all assays that investigated
this compound. All PTP assays were performed in triplicate; error
bars and “±” values represent the standard deviations
of at least three independent experiments unless noted otherwise.
Phosphatase Activity and Inhibition Assays with Small-Molecule
Substrates (pNPP and DiFMUP)
PTP assays
using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) as a substrate were conducted in a total volume of 200 μL,
containing PTP buffer [50 mM 3,3-dimethyl glutarate (pH 7.0), 1 mM
EDTA, and 50 mM NaCl], enzyme (50 nM), and pNPP (0.625–10
mM). PTP reactions were quenched by the addition of 40 μL of
5 M NaOH, and the absorbances (405 nm) of 200 μL of the resulting
solutions were measured on a VersaMax plate reader (Molecular Devices).
Kinetic constants were determined by fitting the data to the Michaelis–Menten
equation using SigmaPlot 12.3. For inhibition experiments (FlAsH,
fluorescein, ReAsH, or As2O3), PTP samples (50
nM) were preincubated with the compound of interest (or control) for
120 min at 37 °C prior to initiation of the PTP assays. The PTP
activities of the solutions were then measured when they were assayed
at 37 °C with pNPP as described above at a pNPP concentration equal to the previously determined KM of the enzyme; 50% inhibitory-concentration
(IC50) values were estimated by fitting the inhibition
data to a four-parameter logistic equation for IC50 determination
in SigmaPlot 12.3. For FlAsH-inhibition time-dependence experiments, pNPP (at a final concentration equal to the previously determined KM of the enzyme) was incubated with FlAsH [or
DMSO, 1% (v/v)] in PTP buffer at 37 °C, and PTP reactions were
initiated by adding enzyme (50 nM). The change in absorbance at 405
nm was then measured continuously at 37 °C.For inhibition
experiments using whole cell lysates, total PTP activities of lysates
from cells expressing the PTP of interest were measured using pNPP as described above. To prepare lysates, 100 mL aliquots
of BL21(DE3)-CodonPlus Escherichia coli cells expressing
the PTP of interest (as described in Expression and Purification of
Shp2 and Shp1 in the Supporting Information) were removed from larger cultures, pelleted, and stored at −80
°C. The pellets were then resuspended in PTP buffer, lysed with
a French press, and clarified by centrifugation. Lysates were incubated
with FlAsH-EDT2 (concentrations ranging from 0.78125 to
25 μM) or DMSO [1% (v/v)] for 120 min at 37 °C and assayed
with 10 mM pNPP.For FlAsH-inhibition assays
using 6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl
phosphate (DiFMUP) as a substrate, PTP samples (50 nM) were incubated
with DMSO [0.5% (v/v)] or FlAsH (concentrations ranging from 62.5
nM to 1 μM) for 150 min at 30 °C in PTP buffer. Reactions
were initiated by the addition of DiFMUP (20 μM; total reaction
volume of 200 μL), and the fluorescence (excitation at 360 nm,
emission at 450 nm) of the resulting solutions was measured continuously
on a SpectraMax plate reader (Molecular Devices) at 30 °C. For
time-dependence experiments, PTP samples (50 nM) were incubated with
FlAsH (1 μM) or DMSO for 15–240 min at 30 °C. The
PTP activities of the solutions were then assayed with DiFMUP as described
above. IC50 values were estimated as described above.
Phosphatase Activity and Inhibition Assays with Phosphopeptide
PTP assays using phosphopeptide as a substrate were conducted in
a total volume of 150 μL, containing reaction buffer [50 mM
3,3-dimethyl glutarate (pH 7.0), 125 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA], enzyme
(diluted to 50 nM in reaction buffer), and phosphopeptide substrate
(100 μM, DADEpYLIPQQG, Calbiochem). Reactions
were initiated by the addition of the phosphopeptide after incubation
of the enzyme with FlAsH for 150 min at room temperature, and the
change in absorbance at 282 nm was measured continuously.[21]
Mass Spectrometry-Based FlAsH-Induced Cysteine-Protection
Assay[22]
Samples for liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) were prepared by incubating wild-type
or C333PShp2 (100 μg, 2.7 μM) with either DMSO or FlAsH
(27 μM) for 30 min in Shp2 catalytic domain storage buffer [50
mM 3,3-dimethyl glutarate (pH 7.0), 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM TCEP]. Samples
were then incubated with iodoacetic acid (IAA, 50 mM) for 30 min to
modify free cysteine residues.[16] IAA labeling
was quenched with TCEP (100 mM), and the samples were precipitated
with trifluoroacetic acid and assessed via sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis. Coomassie-stained gel slices were cut into 1
mm × 1 mm pieces and treated with trypsin. Digested samples dissolved
in acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid were injected onto a custom
packed 2 cm × 100 μm C18 Magic 5 μm particle
trap column. Labeled peptides were then eluted and sprayed from a
custom packed emitter (75 μm × 25 cm, C18 Magic
3 μm particle) with a linear gradient from 95% solvent A (0.1%
formic acid in water) to 35% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile)
in 60 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min on a Waters Nano Acquity UPLC
system. Data dependent acquisitions were performed on a Q Exactive
mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) according to an experiment in
which full MS scans from m/z 300
to 1750 were acquired at a resolution of 70000 followed by 12 MS/MS
scans acquired under HCD fragmentation at a resolution of 35000 with
an isolation width of 1.2 Da. Raw data files were processed with Mascot
Distiller (version 2.5) prior to searching with Mascot Server (version
2.4) against a SwissProt Human database containing the construct sequences.
Search parameters utilized were fully tryptic with two missed cleavages,
parent mass tolerances of 10 ppm, and fragment mass tolerances of
0.05 Da. Variable modifications of acetyl (protein N-terminus), pyroglutamic
for N-terminal glutamine, oxidation of methionine, and carboxymethyl
cysteine were considered. Search results were used to create spectral
libraries for the Skyline software (University of Washington, Seattle,
WA), which was used to quantitate selected peptides using precursor
intensity data from extracted ion chromatograms. Intensities for peptides
identified in the FlAsH-treated protein sample were compared to the
corresponding peptides identified in the DMSO-treated sample, and
their resulting intensity ratios were calculated. Intensity ratios
were then divided by the average of all non-cysteine-containing peptide
ratios to determine normalized relative abundance values. Peptides
that were detected three or more times in the wild-type Shp2 experiments
were included in the abundance analysis.
Results and Discussion
Selective
Shp2 Inhibition by the Organic Biarsenical Compound
FlAsH-EDT2
The organic biarsenical compounds FlAsH-EDT2[19] and ReAsH-EDT2[23] (henceforth FlAsH and ReAsH, respectively, for
the sake of simplicity) make strong and specific interactions with
the tetracysteine peptide motif CCXXCC, and these biarsenicals have
been used for labeling engineered tetracysteine-tagged proteins in
a wide variety of applications.[24] (See
Figure 2A for the structures of FlAsH, ReAsH,
and FlAsH’s parent fluorophore, fluorescein.) Wild-type PTP
domains, including Shp2’s catalytic domain, however, contain
no cysteine-rich motifs, and biarsenicals have not previously been
shown to substantially inhibit the activity of any wild-type PTP.[1,20,25] We were therefore surprised to
observe that the ability of the wild-type mouseShp2 catalytic domain
to dephosphorylate the small-molecule substrate pNPP is strongly inhibited in the presence of the most widely used
biarsenical FlAsH. After incubation with 1 μM FlAsH, the PTP
activity of Shp2 is almost undetectable, whereas the PTP activities
of catalytic domains from a range of other PTPs representing four
different subfamilies[1] are not substantially
affected or only moderately so (Figure 1A;
subfamily NT1, PTP1B and TCPTP; subfamily NT5, PTPH1; subfamily NT7,
FAP-1; and subfamily R7, HePTP). In addition to the strong inhibition
of Shp2, only the catalytic domain of Shp1, which shares 59% PTP-domain
identity with Shp2 and is a fellow member of the NT2 subfamily,[26] is more than 50% inhibited at 1 μM FlAsH.
These findings led us to investigate the dose responses of Shp2 and
Shp1 in the presence of FlAsH. Consistent with our initial screen,
the activity of Shp2 dropped dramatically in a dose-dependent manner
when it was preincubated with FlAsH (Figure 1B). From these data, a Shp2/FlAsH 50% inhibitory-concentration (IC50) value of 74 nM and a Shp1/FlAsH IC50 of approximately
700 nM could be estimated. Note that FlAsH so potently inhibits Shp2
that the IC50 value approaches the concentration of enzyme
in the assay (50 nM enzyme, the lowest concentration that can be routinely
used with pNPP at pH 7.0). FlAsH’s inhibition
of Shp2 is therefore essentially stoichiometric, suggesting that the
observed IC50 value is highly dependent on the assay conditions
chosen.
Figure 2
FlAsH-induced inhibition of Shp2 requires the presence of organic
arsenical moieties, is time-dependent, and is substrate-independent.
(A) After incubation (120 min) with the indicated compounds, Shp2’s
PTP activity was measured with pNPP and normalized
to no-inhibitor controls. (B) Shp2’s rates of dephosphorylating pNPP in the presence of 1 μM FlAsH over 1 min windows
were normalized to a DMSO-only control. The results of three independent
experiments (grayscale) were averaged, and the averaged data (not
shown) were fit as a single-variable exponential decay. (C) Phosphatase
activity was measured by continuous absorbance at 282 nm[21] with a phosphopeptide substrate (DADEpYLIPQQG) at pH 7.0 after incubation (150 min) with FlAsH
(225 nM).
Figure 1
Shp2 is potently and selectively inhibited by FlAsH. (A and B)
After incubation (120 min) at the indicated FlAsH concentrations at
pH 7.0, phosphatase activities of the indicated PTPs were measured
with pNPP and normalized to a DMSO-only control for
the corresponding enzyme.
Shp2 is potently and selectively inhibited by FlAsH. (A and B)
After incubation (120 min) at the indicated FlAsH concentrations at
pH 7.0, phosphatase activities of the indicated PTPs were measured
with pNPP and normalized to a DMSO-only control for
the corresponding enzyme.FlAsH-induced inhibition of Shp2 requires the presence of organic
arsenical moieties, is time-dependent, and is substrate-independent.
(A) After incubation (120 min) with the indicated compounds, Shp2’s
PTP activity was measured with pNPP and normalized
to no-inhibitor controls. (B) Shp2’s rates of dephosphorylating pNPP in the presence of 1 μM FlAsH over 1 min windows
were normalized to a DMSO-only control. The results of three independent
experiments (grayscale) were averaged, and the averaged data (not
shown) were fit as a single-variable exponential decay. (C) Phosphatase
activity was measured by continuous absorbance at 282 nm[21] with a phosphopeptide substrate (DADEpYLIPQQG) at pH 7.0 after incubation (150 min) with FlAsH
(225 nM).All of the PTPs investigated here
contain a strictly conserved
cysteine residue within their active sites,[1] and it is possible that biarsenicals could inhibit PTP activity
through covalent engagement of active-site cysteines. The remarkable
Shp2 selectivity that FlAsH displays, however, is not consistent with
targeting of a widely conserved PTP feature, leading us to hypothesize
that the compound may be acting on Shp2 allosterically, not at the
highly conserved PTP active site.
Characterization of Selective
Shp2 Inhibition by FlAsH
To more fully understand the nature
of selective Shp2 inhibition
by FlAsH, we performed Michaelis–Menten kinetics on the enzyme
after incubation with an intermediate FlAsH concentration (225 nM).
We found that FlAsH-induced Shp2 inhibition manifests exclusively
as a decrease in the enzyme’s catalytic rate constant (kcat), whereas Shp2’s Michaelis constant
for pNPP (KM) is unaffected
by FlAsH (Table 1).
Table 1
Michaelis–Menten
Kinetics of
the Shp2 Catalytic Domain in the Absence and Presence of FlAsH (225
nM)
enzyme
kcat (s–1)
KM (pNPP, mM)
Shp2 without
FlAsH
3.5 ± 0.36
3.2 ± 0.33
Shp2 with FlAsH
0.60 ± 0.066
3.5 ± 0.68
To further characterize FlAsH’s mechanism of action, we
investigated the structure–activity relationships of Shp2 inhibition.
We found that FlAsH’s potency requires the presence of the
compound’s arsenical ethanedithiol moieties, as shown by the
lack of Shp2 inhibition induced by fluorescein, the non-arsenic-containing
compound from which FlAsH is synthesized (Figure 2A).[18] By contrast, a biarsenical compound that does not derive
from fluorescein (ReAsH[23]) inhibits Shp2
with potency that is comparable to that of FlAsH (Figure 2A). Shp2 is not substantially inhibited, however,
by the inorganic As(III) compound arsenic trioxide even at a concentration
(50 μM) 100 times greater than the concentration at which FlAsH
and ReAsH inhibit the enzyme almost to background levels (500 nM).We next measured the time dependence of FlAsH-induced Shp2 inhibition
and found that the degree of inhibition increases over time, requiring
approximately 30 min at 1 μM FlAsH to achieve maximal inhibition
(Figure 2B). To further ensure that the observed
sensitivity of Shp2 to biarsenicals is not an artifact of the use
of the colorogenic small-molecule substrate pNPP
in the enzymatic assays, we tested the ability of FlAsH to inhibit
Shp2’s phosphatase activity on the phosphopeptide substrate,
DADEpYLIPQQG.[21,27] We found that strong
FlAsH-induced Shp2 inhibition is also observed in this phosphopeptide-based
assay (Figure 2C), demonstrating that the effects
of FlAsH on Shp2 activity are not substrate-dependent. Together, these
results, coupled with the compound structure–activity data
mentioned above, establish FlAsH and ReAsH as bona fide inhibitors of Shp2 activity. Moreover, the data suggest that that
these biarsenicals target the enzyme through the compounds’
well-characterized covalent, arsenic-based mechanism of action, presumably
by bonding to cysteine residues in the Shp2 catalytic domain.
Identification
of a Potential Biarsenical-Binding Site on the
Shp2 Catalytic Domain
In an attempt to identify a putative
biarsenical-binding allosteric site on Shp2, we asked whether its
catalytic domain contains any cysteine-rich motifs that are not present
in other PTP domains, as biarsenical compounds are known to bind to
a small set of naturally occurring proteins that contain unusually
cysteine-rich peptide motifs,[28,29] in addition to proteins
that contain engineered tetracysteine sequences.[24] An initial inspection of Shp2’s catalytic-domain
primary sequence, however, offers few clues about the position of
its uniquely sensitive biarsenical-binding site.[1] The entire Shp2PTP domain contains only six cysteine residues
(C259, C318, C333, C367, C459, and C486), which are not closely spaced
in the protein’s primary sequence. (C459 is the active-site
cysteine residue, completely conserved among classical PTPs, that
is integral to the PTP catalytic mechanism.) Intriguingly, however,
C333 of Shp2 is found at a position that is occupied by proline in
almost all other classical PTP domains [Shp1 is the exception (Figure 3A)]. C333 lies within motif 4 of the PTP domain,
which helps to constitute part of the core structure “behind”
the enzyme’s active site (Figure 3B).[1] The side chain of Shp2’s C333 residue
is also close in space to C367’s side chain (5.7 Å from
Cβ to Cβ), and it has been shown
previously that these two “backdoor” cysteines can form
a disulfide bond when the Shp2 catalytic domain is exposed to oxidants.[22,30] Thus, we hypothesized that the C333–C367 interface could
constitute a Shp2-specific binding site for organic biarsenicals,
with C333 acting as the critical specificity element and C367 providing
a second non-Shp2-specific cysteine residue that would be necessary
for strong binding. Although the side chains of both C333 and C367
are buried in Shp2 crystal structures (Figure 3B),[26,31] the earlier finding of Hansen and co-workers
that the electrophilic reagent ABDF can target the conserved equivalent
of C367 in a PTP catalytic domain (C121 in PTP1B) provides support
for the idea that the buried C333 and C367 residues could be accessible,
at least transiently, to small molecules in solution.[16]
Figure 3
Shp2’s backdoor cysteines constitute a buried allosteric
site. (A) Partial primary sequence alignment (human Shp2 numbering)
of the PTPs that appear in Figure 1A. (B) Three-dimensional
structure of the Shp2 catalytic domain (Protein Data Bank entry 3B7O).[26] The PTP active site is colored magenta. The enzyme’s
solvent-accessible surface is shown but rendered transparently so
that the buried C333 and C367 side chains (colored by element) can
be visualized.
Shp2’s backdoor cysteines constitute a buried allosteric
site. (A) Partial primary sequence alignment (humanShp2 numbering)
of the PTPs that appear in Figure 1A. (B) Three-dimensional
structure of the Shp2 catalytic domain (Protein Data Bank entry 3B7O).[26] The PTP active site is colored magenta. The enzyme’s
solvent-accessible surface is shown but rendered transparently so
that the buried C333 and C367 side chains (colored by element) can
be visualized.
Desensitization of the
Shp2 Catalytic Domain by Site-Directed
Mutagenesis
To investigate whether a buried cysteine residue
(C333) could indeed represent a determinant for targeting an enzyme
with high selectivity, we used site-directed mutagenesis to convert
Shp2’s unusual cysteine to the amino acid residue found at
the corresponding position in most other classical PTPs, proline (C333PShp2). The proline mutation had no substantial effect on the in vitro catalytic competency of the Shp2 catalytic domain
in the absence of the biarsenical compound FlAsH (for wild-type Shp2, kcat = 3.5 ± 0.36 s–1 and KM for pNPP = 3.2 ± 0.33
mM; for C333PShp2, kcat = 3.1 ±
0.28 s–1 and KM for pNPP = 3.6 ± 0.62 mM). Strikingly, however, the FlAsH
sensitivity of Shp2 activity is strongly dependent on the presence
of cysteine 333. Inhibition assays revealed that mutation of cysteine
333 to proline is sufficient to completely abolish the Shp2 catalytic
domain’s unusual FlAsH sensitivity (Figure 4A): in agreement with our findings for wild-type PTPs that
contain a proline residue at position 333 (Figure 1A), C333PShp2 activity is not substantially affected at FlAsH
concentrations that inhibit the nonmutated Shp2 catalytic domain to
background. The strong desensitization conferred by the C333P mutation
is observed regardless of the biarsenical compound or the substrate
used in the inhibition assays (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). These results are consistent with
the hypothesis that C333 and C367 constitute a biarsenical-binding
site, with the Shp-specific C333 acting as the key specificity determinant.
(Mutation of C367 yielded poorly expressing and inactive protein,
an observation that comports with previous findings.[22])
Figure 4
Backdoor cysteine 333 is required for the FlAsH sensitivity of
Shp2. (A) After incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations,
PTP activities of the catalytic domains of wild-type and C333P Shp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to DMSO-only
controls. (B) After incubation with 500 nM FlAsH and varying concentrations
of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) (white bars, 0 mM; light gray
bars, 250 μM; dark gray bars, 500 μM; black bars, 1 mM),
PTP activities of the catalytic domains of wild-type and C333P Shp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to no-FlAsH
controls. (C) Target-specific inhibition of Shp2 in a complex proteomic
mixture. After incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations,
PTP activities of lysates of cells expressing wild-type or C333P Shp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to DMSO-only
controls.
Backdoor cysteine 333 is required for the FlAsH sensitivity of
Shp2. (A) After incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations,
PTP activities of the catalytic domains of wild-type and C333PShp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to DMSO-only
controls. (B) After incubation with 500 nM FlAsH and varying concentrations
of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) (white bars, 0 mM; light gray
bars, 250 μM; dark gray bars, 500 μM; black bars, 1 mM),
PTP activities of the catalytic domains of wild-type and C333PShp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to no-FlAsH
controls. (C) Target-specific inhibition of Shp2 in a complex proteomic
mixture. After incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations,
PTP activities of lysates of cells expressing wild-type or C333PShp2
were measured with pNPP and normalized to DMSO-only
controls.In an attempt to further gauge
the specificity of FlAsH-mediated
PTP inhibition and its strong dependence on the presence of C333,
we asked whether FlAsH could effectively target Shp2 in the presence
of free thiols in solution. We found that, although the thiol-containing
reagent β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) modestly reduces the
potency of FlAsH, the biarsenical compound nevertheless potently inhibits
Shp2 in the presence of β-ME (Figure 4B). Importantly, C333’s role in determining the level of Shp2’s
inhibitor sensitivity remains operative in the presence of β-ME
(Figure 4B). Additionally, we have investigated
whether FlAsH can target Shp2 in the context of the competing proteins
(and their attendant free cysteines) in a complex proteome. Upon measuring
the dose-dependent inhibition of total PTP activity from lysates of E. coli that overexpress either wild-type Shp2 or C333PShp2, we find that the activity of wild-type Shp2 lysate is inhibited
in a dose-dependent manner, with an apparent IC50 of 6
μM, whereas the activity of C333PShp2-expressing lysate is
unaffected at concentrations up to 25 μM (Figure 4C). Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that C333
plays a critical role in determining the inhibitor sensitivity of
Shp2, even in the presence of competing molecules that reduce the
apparent potency of a compound that is capable of targeting the putative
333/367 allosteric site.
FlAsH-Induced Protection of Cysteines 333
and 367
To
further evaluate the accessibility of C333 and C367 and gather more
direct evidence for a putative interaction between FlAsH and the C333–C367
interface, we conducted a cysteine-protection assay in which Shp2’s
free cysteines were labeled with iodoacetic acid (IAA) in the presence
or absence of FlAsH.[22] Proteolysis, followed
by identification and quantification of Shp2-derived peptides, revealed
that the peptides containing C333 and C367 were strongly and specifically
protected from carboxymethylation by the presence of FlAsH (Figure 5A,B). By contrast, when we conducted the equivalent
experiment on C333PShp2, we found that the C367 peptide was not protected
(Figure 5C). (The peptide that contains amino
acid 333 does not contain cysteine in the C333PShp2 experiment.)
It is important to note that no protection of Shp2’s active-site
cysteine, C459, was observed in the protection assays conducted with
either the wild-type or C333PShp2 domains, providing further evidence
that biarsenical compounds exert their inhibitory effects at an allosteric
site, not the PTP active site. The cysteine-protection assays, taken
together with the C333P-inhibition assays described above, suggest
that FlAsH directly associates with C333/C367, that the association
requires the presence of the Shp-specific and buried cysteine residue
C333, and that C333 acts as the specificity element that affords the
Shp2 catalytic domain its sensitivity to FlAsH.
Figure 5
Protection of C333 and
C367 by FlAsH. (A) Sequence of the Shp2
catalytic-domain construct used in the cysteine-protection assays,
with the sequences of peptides identified in the MS experiments (1–11)
highlighted. Wild-type (B) or C333P (C) Shp2 (2.7 μM) was incubated
with DMSO or FlAsH (27 μM), followed by addition of iodoacetic
acid (50 mM). The labeled proteins were trypsinized, and the abundances
of the resulting peptides were quantitated by LC–MS/MS. Relative
abundances indicate the normalized intensities of the indicated peptides
in a FlAsH-treated sample as compared to its no-FlAsH control. Peptides
containing positions 333 and 367 are colored orange. Peptides containing
other carboxymethylated cysteines are colored blue. Other non-cysteine-containing
peptides are colored gray.
Protection of C333 and
C367 by FlAsH. (A) Sequence of the Shp2
catalytic-domain construct used in the cysteine-protection assays,
with the sequences of peptides identified in the MS experiments (1–11)
highlighted. Wild-type (B) or C333P (C) Shp2 (2.7 μM) was incubated
with DMSO or FlAsH (27 μM), followed by addition of iodoacetic
acid (50 mM). The labeled proteins were trypsinized, and the abundances
of the resulting peptides were quantitated by LC–MS/MS. Relative
abundances indicate the normalized intensities of the indicated peptides
in a FlAsH-treated sample as compared to its no-FlAsH control. Peptides
containing positions 333 and 367 are colored orange. Peptides containing
other carboxymethylated cysteines are colored blue. Other non-cysteine-containing
peptides are colored gray.
Inhibition and Desensitization of Full-Length Shp2
The full-length
Shp2 protein (Shp2-FL) is substantially more complex
than the isolated Shp2 catalytic domain used in the selectivity-determining
experiments described above. Shp2-FL contains two SH2 domains to the
N-terminal side of its PTP
domain, one of which binds to the PTP domain and autoinhibits its
enzymatic activity.[32,33] The inherent in vitro activity of Shp2-FL is therefore far lower than that of the isolated
catalytic domain, and for reasons of experimental efficiency, the
latter enzyme is often used in Shp2-inhibitor-discovery efforts, as
described above. The use of the isolated PTP domain, however, leaves
open the possibility that an observed Shp2-inhibition event is an
artifact arising from the truncation of the protein. This concern
is particularly acute for a small-molecule allosteric modulator of
Shp2 activity, as the regulation of Shp2’s activity by its
SH2 domain is itself allosteric; how the two allosteric events (autoinhibition
and allosteric-site targeting) might interact is unclear.To
test whether Shp2’s allosteric site can be targeted in the
context of the full-length enzyme, we expressed humanShp2-FL and
assayed its activity in the presence of FlAsH. In agreement with the
results on the isolated PTP domain, we found that Shp2-FL undergoes
strong inhibition upon being incubated with FlAsH (Figure 6A). Dose-dependence experiments revealed a FlAsH
IC50 value of 295 nM when Shp2-FL was assayed at a concentration
of 50 nM (Figure 6B). (The lower activity of
Shp2-FL with respect to the isolated catalytic domain necessitated
a switch of substrate to a small-molecule PTP substrate more efficient
than pNPP; see Materials and Methods and the legend of Figure 6 for details.)
Also in agreement with previous observations, the inhibition of Shp2-FL
is time-dependent, albeit with a rate of inhibition slower than that
of the Shp2 catalytic domain (Figure 6B), as
preincubation for approximately 150 min was required for full inhibition
(compare with Figure 2B). Importantly, the
sensitivity of Shp2-FL to FlAsH is abolished by mutation of cysteine
333 to proline (C333PShp2-FL), suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition
of the full-length protein is identical to that of the isolated catalytic
domain (Figure 6A,B).
Figure 6
FlAsH inhibits full-length
Shp2 in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
PTP activities of full-length wild-type and C333P Shp2 were measured
with DiFMUP at pH 7.0 after incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations
for 150 min (A) or with FlAsH (1 μM) for the indicated time
intervals (B). Data points represent the rates of dephosphorylation
over a 10 min time window (centered at the indicated time point) normalized
to a DMSO-only control for the corresponding enzyme.
FlAsH inhibits full-length
Shp2 in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
PTP activities of full-length wild-type and C333PShp2 were measured
with DiFMUP at pH 7.0 after incubation with the indicated FlAsH concentrations
for 150 min (A) or with FlAsH (1 μM) for the indicated time
intervals (B). Data points represent the rates of dephosphorylation
over a 10 min time window (centered at the indicated time point) normalized
to a DMSO-only control for the corresponding enzyme.
Conclusion and Outlook
Our data
establish the presence of a unique biarsenical-reactive
allosteric site on the catalytic domain of the oncogenic PTPShp2
and provide the first demonstration that a nonconserved cysteine residue
can be targeted for selective PTP inhibition. The unique biarsenical
sensitivity of Shp2 among PTPs may provide a means for studying the
signaling roles of the enzyme and its clinically relevant mutants
with high specificity in living cells. Moreover, given the potential
importance of Shp2 inhibitors in anticancer pharmaceutical development,
its newly unveiled allosteric site may represent a target for Shp2-directed
drug-discovery efforts that range beyond the decidedly nonclinically
ideal biarsenical compounds used in the study presented here. Nonconserved
cysteine residues have previously been targeted to achieve selective
inhibition in enzyme families beyond the PTPs, notably, the protein
kinases.[34,35] The striking feature of Shp2’s novel
allosteric site is that its key selectivity determinant, C333, is
completely buried in Shp2 crystal structures.[26,31] Although we do not currently understand the molecular mechanism
by which C333 participates in biarsenical binding, one plausible hypothesis
is that, in solution, the Shp2 enzyme can sample (at least) two conformational
states: an insensitive state in which the allosteric site is buried
and a sensitive state in which the site is exposed.[30] Binding of a biarsenical by the sensitive state would then
preclude reversion to the insensitive state and hold the protein in
the sensitive, and inactivated, state. Small changes in the kinetics
or thermodynamics of this structural transition could potentially
lead to significant changes in the accessibility of the allosteric
site, a hypothesis that is consistent with our observation that not
all C333-containing PTPs are equally sensitive to biarsenicals (e.g.,
Shp1). The speculative nature of our sampling hypothesis notwithstanding,
recent NMR studies of a DNA-binding protein have demonstrated that
transient, and therefore invisible to crystallography, protein conformational
states can possess radically altered ligand binding properties with
respect to their corresponding ground-state structures.[36] As more examples of cryptic ligand-binding sites
are revealed, and as our understanding of protein dynamics develops,
our notion of what constitutes a druggable ligand-binding site may
expand significantly, opening promising new avenues for drug discovery.
Authors: J N Andersen; O H Mortensen; G H Peters; P G Drake; L F Iversen; O H Olsen; P G Jansen; H S Andersen; N K Tonks; N P Møller Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Stephen R Adams; Robert E Campbell; Larry A Gross; Brent R Martin; Grant K Walkup; Yong Yao; Juan Llopis; Roger Y Tsien Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2002-05-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Marco Tartaglia; Charlotte M Niemeyer; Alessandra Fragale; Xiaoling Song; Jochen Buechner; Andreas Jung; Karel Hählen; Henrik Hasle; Jonathan D Licht; Bruce D Gelb Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Z Y Zhang; A M Thieme-Sefler; D Maclean; D J McNamara; E M Dobrusin; T K Sawyer; J E Dixon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1993-05-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christian Wiesmann; Kenneth J Barr; Jenny Kung; Jiang Zhu; Daniel A Erlanson; Wang Shen; Bruce J Fahr; Min Zhong; Lisa Taylor; Mike Randal; Robert S McDowell; Stig K Hansen Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2004-07-18 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Xiaoqin Wu; Gang Xu; Xiaobo Li; Weiren Xu; Qianjin Li; Wei Liu; Karen A Kirby; Mignon L Loh; Jun Li; Stefan G Sarafianos; Cheng-Kui Qu Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 7.446