Literature DB >> 25519912

Determinants of endogenous ligand specificity divergence among metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Hye Jin Kang1, Angela D Wilkins2, Olivier Lichtarge3, Theodore G Wensel4.   

Abstract

To determine the structural origins of diverse ligand response specificities among metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), we combined computational approaches with mutagenesis and ligand response assays to identify specificity-determining residues in the group I receptor, mGluR1, and the group III receptors, mGluR4 and mGluR7. Among these, mGluR1 responds to L-glutamate effectively, whereas it binds weakly to another endogenous ligand, L-serine-O-phosphate (L-SOP), which antagonizes the effects of L-glutamate. In contrast, mGluR4 has in common with other group III mGluR that it is activated with higher potency and efficacy by L-SOP. mGluR7 differs from mGluR4 and other group III mGluR in that L-glutamate and L-SOP activate it with low potency and efficacy. Enhanced versions of the evolutionary trace (ET) algorithm were used to identify residues that when swapped between mGluR1 and mGluR4 increased the potency of L-SOP inhibition relative to the potency of L-glutamate activation in mGluR1 mutants and others that diminished the potency/efficacy of L-SOP for mGluR4 mutants. In addition, combining ET identified swaps from mGluR4 with one identified by computational docking produced mGluR7 mutants that respond with dramatically enhanced potency/efficacy to L-SOP. These results reveal that an early functional divergence between group I/II and group III involved variation at positions primarily at allosteric sites located outside of binding pockets, whereas a later divergence within group III occurred through sequence variation both at the ligand-binding pocket and at loops near the dimerization interface and interlobe hinge region. They also demonstrate the power of ET for identifying allosteric determinants of evolutionary importance.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational Biology; G Protein; G Protein-coupled Receptors; Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor (mGluR); Molecular Evolution; Signal Transduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25519912      PMCID: PMC4317032          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.622233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  28 in total

1.  Structural views of the ligand-binding cores of a metabotropic glutamate receptor complexed with an antagonist and both glutamate and Gd3+.

Authors:  Daisuke Tsuchiya; Naoki Kunishima; Narutoshi Kamiya; Hisato Jingami; Kosuke Morikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Positive allosteric modulators of metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor: characterization, mechanism of action, and binding site.

Authors:  F Knoflach; V Mutel; S Jolidon; J N Kew; P Malherbe; E Vieira; J Wichmann; J A Kemp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionary trace of G protein-coupled receptors reveals clusters of residues that determine global and class-specific functions.

Authors:  Srinivasan Madabushi; Alecia K Gross; Anne Philippi; Elaine C Meng; Theodore G Wensel; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Illuminating the activation mechanisms and allosteric properties of metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Etienne Doumazane; Pauline Scholler; Ludovic Fabre; Jurriaan M Zwier; Eric Trinquet; Jean-Philippe Pin; Philippe Rondard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Positive allosteric modulation of the human metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (hmGluR4) by SIB-1893 and MPEP.

Authors:  Jesper Mosolff Mathiesen; Nannette Svendsen; Hans Bräuner-Osborne; Christian Thomsen; M Teresa Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Prediction and confirmation of a site critical for effector regulation of RGS domain activity.

Authors:  M E Sowa; W He; K C Slep; M A Kercher; O Lichtarge; T G Wensel
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-03

7.  A regulator of G protein signaling interaction surface linked to effector specificity.

Authors:  M E Sowa; W He; T G Wensel; O Lichtarge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structural basis of glutamate recognition by a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor.

Authors:  N Kunishima; Y Shimada; Y Tsuji; T Sato; M Yamamoto; T Kumasaka; S Nakanishi; H Jingami; K Morikawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Amino acid mutagenesis of the ligand binding site and the dimer interface of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1. Identification of crucial residues for setting the activated state.

Authors:  Toshihiro Sato; Yoshimi Shimada; Naoko Nagasawa; Shigetada Nakanishi; Hisato Jingami
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information.

Authors:  Marco Biasini; Stefan Bienert; Andrew Waterhouse; Konstantin Arnold; Gabriel Studer; Tobias Schmidt; Florian Kiefer; Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Martino Bertoni; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Intramolecular allosteric communication in dopamine D2 receptor revealed by evolutionary amino acid covariation.

Authors:  Yun-Min Sung; Angela D Wilkins; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Theodore G Wensel; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  HUMAN KINASES DISPLAY MUTATIONAL HOTSPOTS AT COGNATE POSITIONS WITHIN CANCER.

Authors:  Jonathan Gallion; Angela D Wilkins; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2017

Review 3.  Integrating structural and mutagenesis data to elucidate GPCR ligand binding.

Authors:  Christian Munk; Kasper Harpsøe; Alexander S Hauser; Vignir Isberg; David E Gloriam
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.547

4.  Mechanism of Assembly and Cooperativity of Homomeric and Heteromeric Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors.

Authors:  Joshua Levitz; Chris Habrian; Shashank Bharill; Zhu Fu; Reza Vafabakhsh; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Residues and residue pairs of evolutionary importance differentially direct signaling bias of D2 dopamine receptors.

Authors:  María E Terrón-Díaz; Sara J Wright; Melina A Agosto; Olivier Lichtarge; Theodore G Wensel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Evolutionary action and structural basis of the allosteric switch controlling β2AR functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Schönegge; Jonathan Gallion; Louis-Philippe Picard; Angela D Wilkins; Christian Le Gouill; Martin Audet; Wayne Stallaert; Martin J Lohse; Marek Kimmel; Olivier Lichtarge; Michel Bouvier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Asymmetrical diversification of the receptor-ligand interaction controlling self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Maxime Chantreau; Céline Poux; Marc F Lensink; Guillaume Brysbaert; Xavier Vekemans; Vincent Castric
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Diversity in protein domain superfamilies.

Authors:  Sayoni Das; Natalie L Dawson; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  UET: a database of evolutionarily-predicted functional determinants of protein sequences that cluster as functional sites in protein structures.

Authors:  Rhonald C Lua; Stephen J Wilson; Daniel M Konecki; Angela D Wilkins; Eric Venner; Daniel H Morgan; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Most yeast SH3 domains bind peptide targets with high intrinsic specificity.

Authors:  Tom Brown; Nick Brown; Elliott J Stollar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.