Literature DB >> 25519527

Effects of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on selected lactic acid bacteria and enterobacteria in co-culture.

I C Starke1, J Zentek1, W Vahjen1.   

Abstract

Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 is used as a probiotic for piglets and has been shown to modify the porcine intestinal microbiota. However, the mode of action of this probiotic modification is still unclear. One possible explanation is the direct growth inhibiting or stimulating effect of the probiotic on other indigenous bacteria. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the growth interactions of the probiotic with different indigenous porcine bacteria in vitro. Reference strains were cultivated with the probiotic E. faecium strain NCIMB10415 (SF68) in a checkerboard assay with 102 to 105 cells/ml inoculum per strain. Growth kinetics were recorded for 8 h and used to determine specific growth of the co-cultures. Additionally, total DNA was extracted from the co-cultures at the end of the incubation to verify which strain in the co-culture was affected. Co-cultivation with eight Enterococcus spp. tester strains showed strain-specific growth differences. Three of four E. faecium strains were not influenced by the probiotic strain. PCR results showed reduced growth of the probiotic strain in co-culture with E. faecium DSM 6177. Three of four Enterococcus faecalis strains showed reduced specific growth in co-culture with the probiotic strain. However, E. faecalis DSM 20478 impaired growth of the probiotic E. faecium strain. The growth of Lactobacillus johnsonii DSM 10533 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 was enhanced in co-culture with the probiotic strain, but co-cultivations with Lactobacillus mucosae DSM13345 or Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM10533 showed no differences. Co-cultures with the probiotic E. faecium showed no impact on the growth rate of four different enterobacterial reference strains (2 strains of Salmonella enterica and 2 strains of Escherichia coli), but PCR results showed reduced cell numbers for a pathogenic E. coli isolate at higher concentration of the probiotic strain. As the in vitro effect of the probiotic E. faecium on enterococci was strain specific and the growth of certain Lactobacillus spp. was enhanced by the probiotic, these results indicate a direct effect of the probiotic on certain members of the porcine gastro intestinal microbiota.

Entities:  

Keywords:  checkerboard assay; cultivation; domino effect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25519527     DOI: 10.3920/BM2014.0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  5 in total

1.  Dietary Corn Bran Fermented by Bacillus subtilis MA139 Decreased Gut Cellulolytic Bacteria and Microbiota Diversity in Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Jinbiao Zhao; Pingting Guo; Wenqing Lu; Zhengying Geng; Crystal L Levesque; Lee J Johnston; Chunlin Wang; Ling Liu; Jie Zhang; Ning Ma; Shiyan Qiao; Xi Ma
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  The influence of probiotic bacteria and human gut microorganisms causing opportunistic infections on Blastocystis ST3.

Authors:  M Lepczyńska; E Dzika
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.181

Review 3.  Effects of therapeutic probiotics on modulation of microRNAs.

Authors:  Amirhossein Davoodvandi; Havva Marzban; Pouya Goleij; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Korosh Morshedi; Samaneh Rezaei; Maryam Mahjoubin-Tehran; Hossein Tarrahimofrad; Michael R Hamblin; Hamed Mirzaei
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  Probiotic Potential Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Enterococcus durans A8-1 Isolated From a Healthy Chinese Infant.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Lu Shi; Juan Wang; Jia Yuan; Jin Liu; Lijuan Liu; Rong Da; Yue Cheng; Bei Han
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  In Vitro Exploration of Probiotic Bacteria Interactions with Candida Using Culture Techniques to Model Dysbiotic Conditions in Colonized Tissues.

Authors:  Emma Wittman; Neela Yar; Francesco De Seta; Bryan Larsen
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.