Literature DB >> 25516929

Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress.

Julian Savulescu.   

Abstract

It is the JME's 40th anniversary and my 20th anniversary working in the field. I reflect on the nature of bioethics and medical ethics. I argue that both bioethics and medical ethics together have, in many ways, failed as fields. My diagnosis is that better philosophy is needed. I give some examples of the importance of philosophy to bioethics. I focus mostly on the failure of ethics in research and organ transplantation, although I also consider genetic selection, enhancement, cloning, futility, disability and other topics. I do not consider any topic comprehensively or systematically or address the many reasonable objections to my arguments. Rather, I seek to illustrate why philosophical analysis and argument remain as important as ever to progress in bioethics and medical ethics. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25516929     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  14 in total

Review 1.  What is Bioethics?

Authors:  Nathan Emmerich
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

2.  Routine recovery of organs for transplantation can be acceptable.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Understanding and Resolving Conflicting Traditions: A MacIntyrean Approach to Shared Deliberation in Medical Ethics.

Authors:  Jessica Adkins
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Do the Benefits of Male Circumcision Outweigh the Risks? A Critique of the Proposed CDC Guidelines.

Authors:  Brian D Earp
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  A CRISPR New World: Attitudes in the Public toward Innovations in Human Genetic Modification.

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Daniel Badgio; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-05-22

6.  In pursuit of goodness in bioethics: analysis of an exemplary article.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Morten Magelssen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  The independence of medical ethics.

Authors:  Johan Brännmark
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-03

8.  Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors.

Authors:  Beverley A Townsend
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?

Authors:  Julian Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Demandingness and Public Health Ethics.

Authors:  Alberto Giubilini; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Moral Philos Politics       Date:  2019-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.